lmay

Neutral. I'm gonna have to respectfully stay neutral on this one. @WallE You're a great guy, don't get me wrong. You're also a previous staff which is a perk, but considering you just came back yesterday I highly suggest engaging with the community for a little longer before re-applying. Your application itself isn't too beefy, but is still effective. Ultimately leaving this up to my peers + I hope to see you ingame again soon. hmu sometime for some more apex, i've gotten better i swear.

Gonna give my two cents on this situation as I was directly involved alongside @dmoney824 (and I'm the person who put the ban string through). *I should not have to clarify this, but I am not being biased/siding whatsoever with either party in this situation. I'm providing my view exactly as I recall seeing it happen in-game.* This was the second sit we had handled from HG Sigmund Freud, the first being the report he made on EatSnacks which also ended in a 2 week Mass RDM ban. The reporter in question was extremely disrespectful/cocky, however he was able to provide sufficient evidence to warrant the 2 week ban for Mass RDM. I've seen no one post it here yet, but the reporter provided a video in the sit of you, alongside EatSnacks mowing him down every time he walked out of the spawn area. You even admitted to this in your initial post and should have known better not to participate in this, even if someone else encouraged you to do it. Here is the video provided by the reporter of the incident You killed Trippy Hippy and Timothy alongside the 2 kills on Sigmund. Even if these kills are brushed off or entirely consensual, they are still RDM in an RP environment. Random Death Match; Killing players with no RP reason. Disrespect, mic spam, or anything that would not result in damage being taken is not RP reasons to kill someone. I do apologize that your first ban on the server fell under such a unique circumstance, however I do believe it should be taken as a lesson going forward. Two wrongs don't make a right, and as such both parties (you, and Sigmund) have since been banned.

gotta agree with chris, staying neutral for now. fix that rep of yours mate

-1 dont think you're ready to staff again

You were reported by one of your victims in-game for mass rdm. You had no active adverts, 16 kills in under 10 minutes, you were only damaged first in 4 of the kills. Disconnected right as I claimed the report. and here's proof that I did have an active report on you by someone you killed before issuing the ban

+1 Promote this man.

So this one's a bit of a weird situation but I'll try to make this as easy to understand as possible. To clarify, I had an active in-game report against you when the ban was issued. Covering this right now so no confusion is created later on. The report began with me asking the reporter (in this case, "jordun") who propspammed. He responded saying that it was you. This begins the evidence profile, which was carefully considered when placing a ban on your account. The in-game reporter's POV (evidence submitted by jordun) The in-game logs, showing your prop spawns. All 30+ of these props were spawned in a span of 5 seconds. This isn't too significant since you said it was a dupe, but should be considered nonetheless as you knew what you were spawning + had intentions of spawning them according to your own response. The job logs, which prove that you were never a job or class that allows building in the streets. Connection logs I got a report in-game a few moments after banning you from @Dan Gardner who just wanted to chat with me about the situation. He told me that your game had crashed and that you had proof of it and mentioned the LTAP being removed as such. I told him that it could be left up to the higherups when you appealed your ban, as we both knew you'd appeal it. He told me that he was trying to warn you when he saw the report get placed on you for the propspam but by that point it was too late... When I asked @Dan Gardner for any supporting evidence, he was able to provide me Discord direct-message logs of when your game crashed. Also once again pointing out the vending machines. These messages do somewhat add up when compared to your connection logs, although the connection logs declared you outside of the server at 2:50 and what's seen here you appear to still be there at 2:52/2:54. This is a strange situation in terms of what should really be considered LTAP. If your game genuinely crashed, it's still technically considered LTAP. This is being left entirely up to the higherups to decide if the ban should be shortened. I personally feel like this should be taken as a lesson moving forward to be careful what you're doing in-game, even if the server pop is very low. This entire situation could've been avoided by being more cautious with your dupes, while also keeping the other players in consideration. I would also like to leave this video here as well, displaying both in-game reports I got in relation to this ban. The first sit is sped up x2 as there was no microphone interactions, everything was spoken over text chat and can be clearly viewed even at two times the speed. (for the convenience of the viewer, and making this faster to upload) I also reloaded in console as the first sit ended, as my camera movement got locked up and I was unable to control the camera. I feel at the very least we should keep the main ban in place since sufficient evidence was provided to suggest the Mass Propspam was valid. Whether or not management wants to be generous and remove the LTAP, that's entirely up to them. At the end of the day, I was only doing my job and taking appropriate action towards the situation. Thank you.

Great job everyone!

Not even gonna give you the whole runaround, straight to the point. -1. Not ready yet.

big -1. Economy is already broken due to people with alts, we don't need to give anyone more ways to make money. Printers and meth are good enough.

Neutral. (never seen him in-game, barebones hours, mediocre staff app) I've never seen you around in-game (not even once) and I'm on daily, also noticed you applied with the absolute bare minimum to meet the requirements. As I haven't seen you in-game, I haven't had any interactions (good or bad) with you so, staying in between and trusting my colleagues votes on this one. +1 you've changed my mind Nonetheless, Good luck!

-1 Nothing but negative interactions with you in-game, constantly loopholing the rules, application doesn't stand out whatsoever against other staff apps I've read.

-1. Typically gets himself tangled up in trouble, makes situations very difficult and although having high playtime (probably AFK'd half of that anyways) in my eyes he's not fit for staff at this time.

W update

Not exactly sure what you're missing, clearly you didn't read the entire thing. And no, you still need to have an RP reason. There's never an instance where you should have nearly 10 kills in UNDER A MINUTE with no RP scenario on-going. If you're under the impression that Mass RDM is totally okay if no one reports you, it's no wonder you have 7 POs alone for that offense. (excluding this one)