Danny_The_Dog

Bro just got +aura for saying that

UNDER REVIEW I know its a little late to say under review, but I'm posting so that you know we still see this. All rules when it comes to an appeal still apply even though I'm typing this. @Merk was wanting to handle this situation and hasn't gotten an opportunity to sit down for it yet. (Get on it merk lol)

UNDER REVIEW Thank you for your appeal. Please allow up to 24-48 hours for a response from a member of the Operator Division. As well as allowing a reasonable timeframe to gather the facts pertaining to your ban. Please note, bans will only be appealed if they are of a false nature, incorrect reasoning, and in some cases mishandling of sit/report/ban.

Confirming Referral + Playtime + Referral + Paragraphs + Time to contribute + Read the Rules I have not given my referral in a very long time. (I don't think at all actually, and idk the last time I responded to a staff app too) I've known matty on for awhile and it has always been positive interactions. I've seen him help out the new guy and never cause any issues. Solid guy imo. He will do great on the team. HUGE +1 from me :))

put a girl on

UNDER REVIEW Thank you for your appeal. Please allow up to 24-48 hours for a response from a member of the Operator Division. As well as allowing a reasonable timeframe to gather the facts pertaining to your ban. Please note, bans will only be appealed if they are of a false nature, incorrect reasoning, and in some cases mishandling of sit/report/ban.

- Not saying age + Playtime - No mic + Some prior experience - Paragraphs - / + Ban on record (I don't really care about it tbh) - Didn't read rules So the age and mic is pretty self explanatory, however we can tell you didn't read the rules. Lastly your paragraphs are not in the acceptable length and kinds just says the same thing over and over. I'll be giving you a -1 until you clean it all up

who are you again?

UNDER REVIEW Thank you for your appeal. Please allow up to 24-48 hours for a response from a member of the Operator Division. As well as allowing a reasonable timeframe to gather the facts pertaining to your ban. Please note, bans will only be appealed if they are of a false nature, incorrect reasoning, and in some cases mishandling of sit/report/ban.

DENIED After extensive conversation in the Executive team, I have decided to deny this. I already took the time to speak to Wooby personally on how to fix the base so there are no further issues. I do not believe a report on the forums was needed due to the staff handling it in game coming to the same conclusion we did.

DENIED Due to this ban NOT being false in nature it is denied. We are not required to show you proof as stated above. The proof given to me by ghostly shows you killing 10 people in 5 minutes. All of which were rdm. As far as "the other party was bribed for the inconvenience" part, I don't see how this is a factor.

UNDER REVIEW I will be taking this appeal, the normal things apply as always that are in the pre written response. However if you are just appealing this due to not being shown evidence, we are not required to show it to you. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt on that one and be handling this appeal as normal as if it is false or unfair in nature.

UNDER REVIEW Thank you for your report. Please allow up to 24-48 hours for a response from a member of the Operator Division. As well as allowing a reasonable timeframe to gather the facts pertaining to your report. @dmoney824 has you covered for this one.

DENIED (Again) The clarification was needed, however looking past the previous points I made, the logs still show MRDM. I wasn't initially going to say anything about the kills. The two most import things are: 1. You admitted everything you did wrong. (2 kills and shot him once, Att MRDM) 2. The logs do show your conflicts accordingly. I understand people are mingy on the server and a general pain in the ass but we purposefully have avenues to handle it for you. Why exactly it wasn't handled by staff? I don't know, I wasn't personally on. However we ask players not to try to solve it themselves because it ends up like this.

DENIED So this was a whole ass lie. Not only were you no where near the fountain, the chess and checkers boards have been REMOVED for quite some time. I could've extended your ban for lying/misuse of the forums and appeal system but I won't. Instead this situation will be noted and further issues will be met with repercussions.

dawg when are you coming back to the server

DENIED I can't even say what you did wrong or say what you said in game, on the forums its that inappropriate. The situation you were trying to speak of for the "reason of the ban" isn't even why you got banned. Don't bother appealing again I will be requesting a community wide ban as well as an account termination.

I cant phyis gun abuse you anymore

FIRST

DENIED After review of everyone's responses carefully, I have decided to deny this ban appeal. The common things I got from all parties is all the variations of your name you tried to use. All of which are inappropriate when you're trying to skate around the rules. @GamingCarrot's screenshots shows what you said in game and I can deduce a poor attitude from them as well. With all of this together it does prove you trying to push the boundaries.

UNDER REVIEW Thank you for your appeal. Please allow up to 24-48 hours for a response from a member of the Operator Division. As well as allowing a reasonable timeframe to gather the facts pertaining to your ban. Please note, bans will only be appealed if they are of a false nature, incorrect reasoning, and in some cases mishandling of sit/report/ban.

SORTA KINDA PARTIALLY ACCEPTED The only think accepted about this situation is the ban revocation. Just so its stated, the ban itself was valid. The length could be argued because there is nothing in stone in the D3A. Whilst it is lifted, you will be getting the appropriate amount of staff strikes for the situation, this has been agreed on amongst the Executive Team. However, further issues worthy of a staff strike will be met with additional punishment and removal from the staff team.

I like the effort put in here, however, a lot of the locations shown either already have building limitations or multiple individual building locations inside. I agree with: Location 3, I've seen gas station bases there as long as it stops before the sidewalk, and the doors inside are owned Location 5, as long as it doesn't interfere with the person living in the actual base and the person on the side doesn't use it to be abusive/minge the guy in the building Location 9, there is another tunnel somewhere that is fair play so why not this one too? Location 10, the only thing wrong id say is all the pre requisites there would have to be to base here. It would be like combing cave base and waterfall base rules Location 11, why not? its secluded and will take alot of innovation to work I don't agree with: Location 1, it allows people to use props to climb to the top, and people could end up blocking of the walk ways to the train tracks behind the building Location 2, has multiple rooms/building locations with ownable doors on the inside. This could end up al megabasing Location 4, it has ownable doors already, and the area underneath is already free game. No reason to extend it outside Location 6-7, cool idea, however making the walkways up there with props could turn very mingey Location 8, its blocking off a walkway? and there is already ownable doors for purchase and you build in there Location 12, could be argued its in the hotel managers domain because to get up there legally (no prop climb) you have to go thru his hotel

I see where you're going with this however there are 3-4 (that I remember) individual base locations in that spot that would then turn into 1 big one. The problems I see with this is that it also will block off the ladder at the end, and having all the smaller places in 1 big one could lead into mega basing as the rules are now. I'm interested to see where this idea goes.

PREACHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH +1