-
Posts
410 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
17
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by Danny_The_Dog
-
DENIED After not following the format and being given ample time to correct it your appeal will be denied. You can re appeal only if the format is followed.
-
For your ban appeal to be considered, follow the format: https://forums.garnetgaming.net/index.php?/topic/23716-format-ban-appeal/ You can edit your current post instead of making another
-
ACCEPTED @Merk generously offered a revocation of the ban instead of pulling evidence (which wouldn't of been required to deny). I am inclined to support that because we came to the decision that any further issues would result in: An instant, non-negotiable permaban without the privilege of an appeal. By joining the server again after I unban you, you are acknowledging the above terms.
-
DENIED Refer to: https://forums.garnetgaming.net/index.php?/topic/26984-player-report-on-gamingcarrot/
-
DENIED After reviewing all the clips that @GamingCarrot provided, I have decided to deny it, and here's why: The video shows your structure outside, this structure does in fact not block the radiable doors, but it does the quick door. This is important because the rules only states primary door, doesn't clarify what makes it a primary door. The primary door for the base owners is different then the primary door for the raiders. The reason for the denial of the report AND the appeal is because of you trying to use a loophole in the wording of the rules. Gamingcarrot didn't do anything wrong, he explained everything to you, gave you chances, and told you it will be taken as harassment if you returned.
- 1 reply
-
- 3
-
-
-
No Tengo Ban Appeal (4 years since ban lol)
Danny_The_Dog replied to jalapeno_master4's topic in Denied
DENIED A couple things led me to my decision. 1. You have tried to appeal before here and was told by Cyber (stretchy) that you did threaten it 2. It states in the report rules that this is not a place for apologies 3. You also ban evaded 2 years after your initial ban I'd be more inclined to accept it if you didn't already try to get around it twice in two different ways. I also have to treat these the same. A short while ago someone appealed for a ddos or a dox threat and I denied that too Unfortunately rules are rules and the D3A says permanent, not 4 years. -
ACCEPTED We can all agree that a warn is warranted, however to issue said warn, KOG Melanie needs to be online. The staff team will keep an eye out for him. As far as the disconnection, your screenshot shows him not online but there is no proof time wise of when that was compared to the rest of the situation. To issue any punishment in accordance of connection/disconnect we need our logs, which mrjohnweak could've gotten, however I don't think a ban for diss + ltap is necessary. The D3A doesn't specify that and would it only be categorized as "Any warnable offence + ltap (1 Day Ban)". Thank you for your report and we will handle it in-game ASAP.
-
DENIED Upon review of the evidence quickly provided by @GamingCarrot, I will be denying this appeal. The rules state consensual rdm is still rdm. That's the biggest thing. Secondly, the logs show over 5 kills in various parts of the streets with you engaging first. Thank you for attempting an appeal, as well as the effort you have put into your appeal.
- 1 reply
-
- 1
-
-
Hedonistic Society's Staff Application
Danny_The_Dog replied to Hedonistic.Society's topic in Denied
DENIED I'm not even HR just doing them a favor because you deleted your app and ask for it to be denied. -
-/+ Age + Playtime + Referrals + Paragraphs + Time to be staff + Read the rules I'd say a +1
-
+Age +Playtime +Referrals IF confirmed -Paragraphs -Didn't read the rules The two things stated above will make me give a -1. I know we are stingy about the paragraphs but its just to show effort and being able to follow rules. You also missed something in the rules matter of fact that lets me know you didn't read them.
-
DENIED You just appealed. I just accepted it and reduced your ban. This does not make sense. You re worded your appeal after already getting a response. The decision was already made. Buster didn't do anything wrong besides your ban length and I already fixed it. This makes me question my prior decision. There is no need to post anything else about this issue on the forums. Continued action that is unnecessary may cause your case to be negatively effected.
-
KINDA ACCEPTED Upon review of the evidence provided by @busterbignut. I am going to treat this as a ban appeal and I will reduce it but not lift it completely. He showed me was that there was a feud between you and a couple other guys and he separated the two parties and talked to each individually. It started with them harassing you but then backed off when confronted then you got reported for harassment. The other people complied and left you alone but you did not leave them alone. You repeatedly went to them to start drama even after Buster gave you a verbal warning. Buster did not do anything wrong besides your ban sentence. Upon review of the D3A together we have agreed on a reduction to 2 weeks. This situation will be noted and further altercations may lead to a longer ban. I am logging in now to unban you myself.
-
Please use the following format for a staff report: https://forums.garnetgaming.net/index.php?/topic/23718-format-playerstaff-report/ Or this one for a ban appeal: https://forums.garnetgaming.net/index.php?/topic/23716-format-ban-appeal/ If you could use those formats it will give us a better idea of going on. Your story sounds very strange and does not make alot of sense. Thank you
-
ACCEPTED A couple key things solidified my decision Admaxis quotes: "This is what got me banned bro, this right here what I'm about to do" "Are there any admins on? If not I'll exploit rn" "This is the shit that got be banned, it has history" Besides these quote's, the additional video's showed the spawning of the ammo as well as the live grenade getting shot into it. After watching this happened the sound and shaking of the screen from the video provided above was replicated. The chance was given, the warning issued, with the understanding of it not being done again. Yet it was. Therefore I cannot dismiss this issue. Admaxis will be banned without the privilege of an appeal.
- 5 replies
-
- 11
-
-
-
-
DENIED Do I have to say anything?
-
Hey Admaxis, Id like to talk about the situation a little because you introduced yourself on the report. Some questions, observations, and comments etc. Firstly I saw the name "HG Jugo" in game, by following the steam id I knew it was you before you said anything here. But my questions is why would you change your name from your typical name in game when you did this? Was it in hopes of getting away with what you did? When the report was made and you saw yourself caught then you came forward saying who you are. You have been given a second chance on the pretense that you didn't know it was and issue and that you wouldn't do it again. Bob was nice enough to accept your appeal and warned you if it happened again it would be no questions asked with no chance of an appeal. Lastly it is stated that the forums is not a place for apologies. At this time I have not came to a conclusion because I am waiting on the rest of the evidence to be provided by Remmy. This is only happening because there is no strict evidence showing the grenade hitting the ammo, however it can be reasonable deducted by the last shot in the video being louder, and shaking the screen more. I do want you to know that I could finalize a ban based off your admittance.
-
Hello Mocha, I will be handling this report. I just have a few questions to clarify. 1. Do you have any evidence, screenshots or video, to prove your allegations? 2. I just would like some more info on the situation as a whole, seems like there is some key points here I don't have. 3. Lastly, you said that you killed him, and saying you know it will get denied makes me question the reason for the report. If it is truly an issue then why would it get denied? Thank you in advance :))
-
DENIED Due to the lack of following the format and being given opportune time I am going to deny this appeal. Feel free to re apply following the correct format.
-
UNDER REVIEW Thank you for your report. Please allow up to 24-48 hours for a response from a member of the Operator Division. As well as allowing a reasonable timeframe to gather the facts pertaining to your report. Please note: Withholding information, dishonesty, or otherwise attempting to portray anything outside of the facts, will result in a denial of your report and possible disciplinary action on your account. @Remmy I'm reviewing this situation, if you could please provide the additional footage you have Id appreciate it
-
-
Please follow this format for your appeal to be considered, you can edit your current topic instead of making a new post:
-
I think this could be a good idea but it is preferred to follow the format and have more information in your suggestion
-
+Age -/+ Playtime -Paragraphs +Bro said 1-2 years +Read the rules The reason Im gonna give you a -1 is for the paragraphs. With that 3rd line indented I dont know if you were trying to count that as a second one? However you do need 2 strong paragraphs before I update my choice. Best of luck. Also Im still here xD
-
1. Use this website: https://www.steamidfinder.com with the link to your profile 2. Take your steam id from that and plug it into our ban database (that will give you the id of the person who banned you) 3. Use both of those to fill in the format and you can take a screenshot of the ban database as proof of ban. This is the format we are looking for