Jump to content
DarkRP Rules Updated (4/28/2024) ×

huskaii

Account Terminated
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    540

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Posts posted by huskaii

    Donator Trails / Prestige Trails

    in Accepted

    Posted

    18 minutes ago, ak47 said:

    1. If this post hasn't even been up for 24 hours, and there's already a good amount of people who seem to be really excited about this potentially being added in to the game, I think the hype is there. I don't see your point. I don't think there is an issue. If only a certain amount of people can use it, then it wouldn't cause much lag. With the hype factor proven, it would push people to want to prestige, hence spending more time on the server.

    yes, there are a good amount of people that think a random trail underneath their feet would be cool. So what, that proves us nothing. There has been plenty of "hype" for hundreds of additions that get denied, dont act like this is any different. Lets actually look at what it would entail rather than thinking "cool trail i want it."

    1. There are already trails associated with some of the obtainable artifacts. While adding a few more artifacts that do this would be possible, adding a whole vending machine of trails would end up creating everybody on the server to be using one. 

    2. Putting behind a paywall would be the same idea as blood on MRP, while it was cool at first, there was problems with it involving the mechblood that made it hard to see the person you were shooting at. Trust me, you dont want even 20+ people running around with these trails on the server, it would cause a hassle and get annoying very fast. But you have to keep in mind that this is intended to be a Vanilla DRP server. I feel as this would take away from that feel if a bunch of people are running around with pink trails following them.

    3. Adding it to prestige would be the only reasonable idea here, and even then the amount of prestiged players is small enough that it wouldn't even be worth the time to add this in when there could be other additions put in place instead. 

    4. The lag is something that would need to be tested. Not even going to bring that up as it isnt something measurable until it would be implemented.

    TLDR: There are other additions that would be much better in place of this, however adding it in as a prestige reward would be the most viable option.

     

    If garnet or proggy have any input on this, please do so as this gunna end up like my third person revamp suggestion years back real fast

    Donator Trails / Prestige Trails

    in Accepted

    Posted

    32 minutes ago, aidanpoppas123 said:

    -1 

    cool idea but it would be nearly impossible to make this not create tons of lag

    Imagine 30-50 people running around with an effect following them around at all times, that would cause tons of lag

    this. 

    -1

    It adds really nothing of value to the experience of DRP anyways.

    • Agree 1

    Unban Appeal

    in Accepted

    Posted

    not to be that guy, but mans made an appeal because he cheated, then tried to ban evade. Not only is he admitting he cheated, but his appeal is legit just him apologizing. Ban appeals are not for apologies, but are for you being falsely banned. Every other person in the same situation is denied for these reasons, dont see why this is an exception

    but i guess its your decision in the end, just think you should understand that for the next appeal

    • Dumb/Shitpost 1
    • Agree 1

    Appeal for a perm ban - Delta 2x

    in Denied

    Posted · Edited by huskaii

    19 minutes ago, tdizz said:

    First of all who are you to comment on appeals you have nothing to do with, second of all the screenshot bio took is far against the rules and fair enough to ban for.

    did you at all read anything I said? I clearly explained that. Next time do me a favor and read before you post some shit like that.  omagalul

    Appeal for a perm ban - Delta 2x

    in Denied

    Posted

    6 hours ago, ItssBio said:

    https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/825336951833362452/873933138840158218/unknown.png

    https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/825336951833362452/873931770784014386/unknown.png

    https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/825336951833362452/873931801939288084/unknown.png

    https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/825336951833362452/873931965546528768/unknown.png

    https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/825336951833362452/873932092931706880/unknown.png

    https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/825336951833362452/873932162569764885/unknown.png

    https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/825336951833362452/873932294111514674/unknown.png

    https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/825336951833362452/873932837185798174/unknown.png

    spacer.png

    The only real *evidence* that would hold any ground here is the second screenshot or the discord chat logs. As this incident occurred on 8/08, most of the chat logs either have nothing to do with racism at all (reason he was banned) And the closest racism based chat message was at least a week before the ban.  So by the looks of it, you either  for some reason keep way too many screenshots of stuff like this, or saw the ban appeal and went back in chat logs to justify a ban based off old messages. While the discord messages could warrant a community ban, a ban from a single server is just targeting. Now, don't get me wrong I believe there should be some more explaining on both ends before a decision is made, but a straight denial would also do nothing.

    Also before you say anything, please consider two things. 
    1. I am simply picking apart his evidence to make it more reasonable and make sense for others based on the context.

    2. There is the 30 day ban appeal rule, so regardless of the ban, he waited too long after the fact. But using that logic I believe that should also account to evidence usage too. Such as him being banned or using evidence that is more than 30 days prior to the ban as a reason to warrant said ban.

     

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Guidelines

  I accept