.gif.d65e94e212dab7b9ce3c87bf86d687d4.gif)
.gif.716eb560eaeb09ea2a9c1c2905bcd5e6.gif)
Vortex
-
Posts
331 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
7
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by Vortex
-
-
1 minute ago, IAreGunner said:
why would someone think that lol
Some people love to assume things
-
1
-
-
-1
You already know my stance
4 hours ago, Orion8559 said:Player B
Hi I’m Player B, to give better context I was damaged by player ‘A’ for 3/4 of my health, I tried rotating with climb swep to hit a nice flank to find out Player ‘A’ had changed position. To which I proceeded to relentlessly try and figure out Player ‘A’ location only to find him a couple minutes later, the rest is history…
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
-
+1
I’m big atheist but this suggestion slaps.
18 hours ago, Nutter said:-
1
-
-
-1
I don’t find this necessary IMO it should stay the same, you’re the first person I’ve ever seen that is salty over that rule. Hobos were never meant to use big artillery.
-
1
-
2
-
-
3 hours ago, UrdnotWrex said:
have to strongly disagree. It's supposed to have AOE, sure, but the range on it can be wild. I tested an RPG from the sewers recently, and it can easily kill players and destroy printers on the surface. Same is true if you're basing next door to someone else getting raided (for example, the garage next to the PD)
It’s not supposed to destroy things or even deal damage trough world props, what you are referencing is simply a bug. RPG has always had the same blast radius and there’s no reason to change it now after so many years because some people can’t handle its utility to perform in raids.
You’re basically asking to nerf kill the only weapons worth getting from !cases. I won’t stand with that
-
1
-
-
To yall saying reduce the rocket splash damage, it’s an RPG it’s supposed to be an AOE weapon. In my opinion if anything, bases are too difficult to breach in with the far away peaks and other constraints. These launchers are worth millions but they’re situational and extremely risky to pull off, hence why I would much rather nerf basing than launchers since they’re emblematic and a purchase lots of players look forward to when saving their IGM.
-
1
-
-
-1
People that base already got an advantage over raiders since the RPG nerf.
-
2
-
-
Neutral
climb swep my beloved
-
44 minutes ago, Nutter said:3 hours ago, Vortex said:
Going to implement this fantastic idea ASAP
Idk, how about prioritizing the textures in the unbox menu first or like the lighting brightness that keeps changing randomly in the map. There are accepted suggestions from months ago that have yet to be implemented, but nah let’s throw poop at each other at prestige 2+ ASAP because that’s clearly what the people need right now smh
-
1
-
-
Yall are so quick to +1 nonsense like this but serving out -1s like it’s candy on ideas that are more deserving.
big -1
-
1
-
1
-
-
20 hours ago, HSR Sampo Koski said:
I'm not really sure when the last time you played on the server was, as I have not seen you on before, but I can assure you this is as far from true as it gets. I would wager that most players who are level 80-90 have RPGs and that might be being generous, and it doesn't really matter anyway when most of those players who have them are the most active.
The sole reason there are ‘’alot’’ of players w them is because they used to be somewhat affordable. Since the new case update they are more expensive to get from unbox, but most people ignore that and sell them for the same old 5-6-7m an rpg. Give it a few months and alot of rpgs will be lost and to get more people will have to open cases and won’t be able to afford to sell them off for what they used to go for. Like it or not RPG’s are not worth the 5m everyone is selling them at. Once the ‘’old’’ rpgs run out, the market will stabilize and fewer people will get their hands on them. That’s how it works and that why you shouldn’t sell your rpgs and gls right now for too cheap:)
-
1
-
-
-
-
‘’Hey Siri! Set a timer for 30 minutes’’. Pretty easy imo
-
1
-
-
On 2/11/2024 at 11:42 AM, AlexConway said:
I know the DarkRP Management Team is actively policing serious alting (3+), but a hard coded solution would affect people who don't alt but use a VPN that may be shared by another player, etc.
In that case I feel like it would be appropriate to inform everyone and add it to the next rules update, (max. Alts limit / punishments, etc.) in order to leave no doubts nor questions unanswered.
-
1
-
-
7 hours ago, Nutter said:
That doesn't count as a nerf, that's really just a bug fix for an exploit that got taken too far.
That ‘’exploit’’ that you fixed was present since the party update first appeared. Possibly why some people tought of it as some sort of game mechanic and not a bug since it was well known even back in the proggy days. If like you say it was just a bug fix for an exploit that got taken too far, then it went unchecked/unchanged for too long imo. I get what you’re saying tho.
7 hours ago, Nutter said:as we know, many OG players have alts which give them access to insane amounts of money.
I’d love to give a simple fix to this big alt moneys printers farming strat but only you can make something happen. I keep hearing alts and bad economy all the time so why aren’t you limiting or removing them. It seems about time something is done because it’s constantly being used as an argument against ‘’OG’’ players with alts (somewhat valid) but don’t hate the player, hate the game! If/when alts get a nerf, I would love to see other ways for players to make money outside of the usual 3; meth, crack & printers.:)
-
1
-
-
Everyone is complaining about the prices of cases but this is the reason why explosives are suppose to be expensive! After all, not everyone should be able to own a rocket / grenade launcher. You put yourself at risk each time you pull one out. I've lost 2 M202's and countless other launchers in my days and It's part of the game. Removing or nerfing blast trough props is gonna affect the server and remove a fun aspect of the game that's been there for a long time. I almost forgot to add that explosives already received a nerf couple months ago where you are no longer exempt from taking damage from your own GL's / RL's.
-
1
-
2
-
-
+1
easy to code, gives the player a warning. Great suggestion!
-
Yesx2
+1
-
+1 great idea this will make things more interesting for the police force
-
10 hours ago, Rosie said:
@Vortex lol just no
See you on VR
-
1
-
1
-
-
+1
Lazyness at its finest
2 hours ago, Vortex said: -
19 hours ago, Failed401 said:
this is one of the worst applications I have ever seen; all it is is that it is an ego application.
I could not have said it better.
-1
-
There was an issue with cameras back in the days. Players would phys gun the camera into someone’s base to see the peaks, number of players and printers. If they can make it so it can’t be picked up with phys gun nor grav gun but instead placed around with the use of the tool gun, it might just work.
-
1
-
3
-
Add a Statute of Limitations
in Suggestions
Posted
That’s the thing, if it’s no written in the f4 rules it’s clearly a sign that there are no time limitations which makes total sense. Back then, the only reason a player would decide not to shoot back their attacker was the logs system would reset making it complicated. Now with the new logs system it’s not even a problem.
It shows there is an issue with ‘’some’’ staff that seem to like to have their own interpretation of the server rules. My sit shouldn’t have taken 30 min + the need for merk to log on when they could’ve simply idk maybe look at the server rules? If I didn’t call for a higher up aka merk didn’t come to the rescue I would’ve been either warned or jailed for something I knew wasn’t against the rules. Now imagine you’re a new player and don’t have easy access to merkio, well you’re most likely getting false jailed or warned. That’s the real problem.