Coyotee

Because testing a few shots on someone will 100% prove that he wasn't flung into base.

what makes this different is he has no evidence that he actually was on the building. He was flung on the building and had no video evidence. They just have false evidence they made AFTER war which has nothing to do with what ACTUALLY happened. That's the problem here

your still failing to recognize my point. All my evidence shows him headgliching over the hill, thus meaning none of my evidence shows him CLEARLY on the building nor does it show the building rendered, I have nothing else to say. Just let a higher up handle this.

All your rebuttals have so far proven all my points true but you fail to notice it. What I don't get about you pencil is that you for some reason think I knew I was base camping and knew I what I was doing, but your failing to realize that all I was doing was killing someone I saw over the hill, you keep arguing that "IT APPEARS" hes on the hill that's because it does. Your stretching the words "looked" and "appears" to statements that mean I knew he was in the base, im saying this because from every perspective on that hill, almost everyone can agree with me that it shows hes headglitching over the hill.

LOOKING LIKE? that admits me saying he was in base? that means it looked like he was at hill. The fact you care so much worrys me that this is something personal some how over a warn, over something that is very easy to end by recognizing that i clearly was just playing war, killing headglitchers over the hill. Enough said. You are taking this too far pencil over something YOUR not apart of, nor need to be apart of because its VERY simplistic.

Ignore it looking like hes peeking over the hill? what is your point pencil? Also was i supposed to kill him and run over to notice that he was in the building? your points are flawed.

"As you can tell from this video, my evidence is skewed." All this isnt related since i CANT SEE HIS OUTLINE. AND yet again, no sight of the building

https://gyazo.com/93797e23254fc96b1a572663fd86659a https://gyazo.com/cac216bbc52fff8950ca064ab81e3b7f https://gyazo.com/0483e464441607ba01e5a4645a56ccbc My evidence that isnt skewed

Obviously you think im this dumb to somehow "forge" a picture in the matter of seconds before a sit. Im not a photoshop genius.

i dont know if you noticed but i wasnt in 3rd person and i dont even know how to do that high of third person, second of all that first picture is a different hill. Your WAY to persistent with this. Another thing is my game doesnt look that that, your settings are different. Ill provide my OWN evidence. Not SKEWED evidence.

DId you see the building in the video? No. you cant.

Go to the spot, and tell me if you can see it from the tip. Edit: I just went there, NO MATER what position your at, you cant see the building. It DOESNT render.

My location that it wasnt basecamp, go to the location in game, even at the tip, you cant see the building.

I moved backwards in the picture SO I DIDNT DIE. You have to consider both sides before commenting. "it excuses the fact it is RDM just because he "wasn't in my render"." This makes no sense since even from the video it shows it looks like hes peeking over the hill

*Coyote returns to the server, gets in drama already* The one thing that is the most clear in this whole post is that its very noticeable that you cant see that building from the hill, hence me thinking you were just at the hill. I respect the extent your going for this but my proof is in your post showing you cant see it. How was i supposed to know you were on that building from that perspective? "He could have killed me and took a step back to “unrender” the building" In the video the building doesnt even render?