chewy2dropbombz

+ Playtime + Referral + Paragraphs + interactions Throughout the time that I’ve known this guy, he’s been super supportive, and I know that he would make an excellent staff member. I know this for a fact because he’s my pet I technically own him. In game, of course. Good luck, Pookie.

This will never happen.

-1 did not read staff rules. (aka lied about it)

Just a joke bro.

Welp, welcome to being a normal player without having this server as a job.

YOU BETTER NOT COME BACK RAHHHH /s Have fun lol.

+1 I am a perfectionist too bro so I get what you mean.

Since I was the one who reported him for SSA, I'm going to provide all the clips I have of him both baiting and SSA people to death. I'm also going to provide the entire sit that took place in full. Video with everything: Note: At some points the audio get very quiet so you might need to turn up your volume to hear. Some corrections to the video 1. I said he closed the door, but what actually happened was I closed the door and turned around to go back in. He then locked it behind me, preventing me from entering, and tried to attack and kill me with the stun stick. 2. I also mentioned that the moment I accused him of stun stick abuse, he stopped and ran away. However, the truth is he was stopped before he could kill me because someone had reported his base as a fail base. Which it was but that's not the point.

Congrats to all of you. Keep up the good work!

+1 This would make building bases much more simple. Most of my dupes don't even work because they have banned props in them.

-1 - Formatting - Incorrect Information - Experiences - AI Detected - Banned The formatting is not correct, and I also couldn’t find anything related to XYZGaming and ABCNetworks even existing. ANYONE Please do correct me if these do exist. Didn't read the Staff Rules. As for my own past experiences with you, you chose to be a nuisance by buying the doors at a place where I had just placed my building sign and you clearly saw me building and yet still decided to be a problem. You refused to sell the doors until staff got involved, only then selling them out of fear of getting in trouble. I overall have had no good experiences with you and feel like you would not make a good staff member. Edit 1: He has been banned for 2 days after making this post. (If anyone wonders why I didn’t buy the doors, it’s because I thought I had. I looked away too quickly when purchasing them, so it didn’t go through, and I didn’t realize it. I just started building.)

+1 + Playtime (meets requirements) + Experience + Read the staff rules + Previous experience + Referrals - Active warns (2) ± Paragraphs I've had some good experiences with Ghostly788. He's always been supportive and informative especially with new players. While he can be a bit of a troll at times it’s never with any harmful intent and truthfully he always makes up for it when it comes to being helpful. His extensive playtime and previous experience make him a solid candidate for staff but the two active warns and the just meeting the requirements paragraphs are areas to consider for sure. Overall I believe he would make a good and helpful competent addition to the staff team. I personally would like to see more improvement in the paragraphs. I know that you have it in you! For the people who don't know the ± is the Plus–minus sign it is the same as -/+.

As something BusterBigNut has said to me before "If someone meets requirements, please don't try and consider if it's enough for your standards. They either meet playtime requirements or they don't." I feel like its not very necessary for you to judge off of playtime as well as include it 2 times.

+1 + Hours + Paragraphs + Read staff rules + Previous experience (I don't really remember any of my own experiences so I'm going off of community members posts above this one.) The feedback on this person and this application is overwhelmingly positive. They have a strong playtime follow staff rules and their application stands out (IMO). Many community members have observed their active participation and dedication. Their past staff experience and well crafted application have earned praise from multiple reviewers. Although there were some initial concerns about their age they’ve shown maturity and respect. Their improvements since their last application are notable. Overall they are well regarded by the community and have strong support from staff members. If chosen I’m confident they will be a valuable addition to the staff team and the server. Good luck!

+1 +Time to contribute +Age +Playtime (meets requirements) +Reading staff rules +Referrals (conformed) +Past experiences as staff +Paragraphs +Active Warns (None) This application is well formatted and the applicant is a respectable person. In-game, they are consistently helpful and have a good grasp of the server's rules and community. Their past experience in CS1.6 CSS and GMOD from 7-10 years ago shows they have solid moderation skills which will be helpful in this role. They’re also willing to step in during off-hours, which is important given the timezone differences and lack of staff coverage at certain times. Their dedication experience and understanding of rules make them a strong candidate. They’ve shown they can be fair and helpful especially with new players. If they become staff I’m confident they’ll adapt quickly and contribute positively to the community.

+1 + Timezone + Playtime+ Age+ Paragraphs + Formatting + Read the Staff Rules - Bans As JonnyFlame mentioned "I'm glad you elaborated on each ban but some of these are concerning. It has been a long time since the last ban but I won't hold it against you too much as you seem to have learned what went wrong in each situation." I agree with this assessment although from what I've seen of you in-game I believe you would make a good staff member. You have the potential to be very helpful especially given the times you play as there aren’t many staff members on during those hours due to your timezone. I believe you would be very beneficial because that's when most chaos happens for an extended period of time (MST is my timezone so it's very late in the night).

+1 + Time to contribute + Age + Playtime (meets requirements) + Reading staff rules. + Referral + Past experiences as staff + Paragraphs - Active Warn The application is well formatted and the applicant is a respectable person. I have seen a lot of good from them and believe they would make an excellent staff member. Based on your previous experience as a moderator for an SCP:SL server I too have moderated a server in SCP:SL (it was an official server) and from what I know it's clear you have a solid understanding of how moderation works which isn't too different from moderation in Gmod. This experience alone (IMO) demonstrates that you can understand the responsibilities of being staff and I’m confident that if you were to become a staff member you could easily adapt to the new rules of the position.

-1 - playtime - lied in app - effort- paragraphs -Incorrect steam id. FYI: MONKEY_GAMING has played for 26:41:00 8:49, 8/3/24 STEAM_0:0:617161229 This application is seriously lacking. The playtime is minimal (not even stated) and the applicant was dishonest in their submission showing little effort. Given the incomplete content and the fact that the account was only created today (forum's acc) I can't support this application.

See you soon.

Neutral - Hour's | Not necessary as it does meet requirements | ± paragraphs ± Interactions in game + read staff rules + age + Referral (conformed) I personally have no interaction at all with this person. So based off of the paragraphs themself its alright. I like the formatting and the grammar in this sentences. Edit 1: After observing your gameplay and interactions with others I have to conclude that you're not fit to be staff at this time. I’ve noticed that you've been disrespectful to other players and have antagonized them on several occasions. Edit 2: While I understand that everyone has rough days or moments of frustration I’ve seen a mix of both positive and negative interactions from you. Due to this I’m reverting to a neutral stance on your application. Some of your actions come across as immature but I still believe you have potential to be a very good and understanding staff member. Best of luck. (Regarding the situation where you tried to take prints without any advert: This was a misunderstanding as you were just joking around and I understand that so I won't be holding that against you.) For the people who don't know ± is the plus–minus sign or the plus-or-minus sign. It's the same as +/- but as a symbol.

+1 Very good application and hours are amazing. Very good person to play with. :)

+1 for the idea and for the fact that I'm in that picture. :3

+1 + Previous Staff+ Time Played + Good referrals - Ban's - Paragraphs From my own experiences he seems to be a nice person. I have seen overall an overwhelming level of respect to other players and I feel like they would be a good fit to be staff. I have seen quite a lot of talks about him being toxic but from what I've seen he has been a very chill person.