kerry

Yes, of course. It helps to find the problem to get someone to report it so I can take action. Reading too deeply into my comment aren't you?

Agreed, I have caught many mass Rdmers/propspammers through the @ chat -1 to its removal

I love how there have been significantly fewer police minges now that this guy is gone. go figure.

@Santa Claus It's another SantaMyClanta alt! And like these fellas said, use the format.

Good riddance, I woulda' perma'd you myself If I had proof.

For one, chill on the disrespect. And I'm sorry, let me ask your question back to you. Did you read the rule? Because it says this 36. You may not climb SWEP abuse (Ex: Hitting players with the Climb SWEP for no reason) You see that it says "Ex:" That means For example, not that that is the direct definition of the system's abuse.

I don't expect it to be patched tbh, just made to be against the rules so people can be reported/warned for it, because regardless, it IS abuse

36. You may not climb SWEP abuse (Ex: Hitting players with the Climb SWEP for no reason) This rule is perhaps one of the most neglected in the server, and one of the most broken. By definition, abuse means to misuse something to serve a purpose which it was not originally intended. Now, about every day I will see people on the server using the climb swep's rightclick function paired with Speed and Jump boost, to fly frantically around the map, this is not what the SWEP is intended for and so, I think it should be patched, or become an infringement of rules. For clarification, I mean this: Buying speed/jump boost Jumping up, and then when you land holding w, shift, and rightclick on the climbswep to do a roll and fly forward. 36. You may not climb SWEP abuse (Ex: Hitting players with the Climb SWEP for no reason) THE RULE DOES NOT ONLY APPLY TO SMACKING PEOPLE WITH IT, AS IT GIVES THAT AS AN EXAMPLE, IT IS NOT THE ONLY APPLICATION OF THE RULE OF ABUSE. ABUSE IS MISUSE FOR A PURPOSE WHICH WAS NOT ORIGINALLY INTENDED.

What do you mean you didn't do it? Your name is on the prop and your steamid in the logs, we even had a sit about it.

That was a completely unrelated matter that happened 5-6 hours prior, and that user has already been banned.

You got on the other night and propspammed to defend yourself from being shot when raiding a base. You spammed concrete barriers and then left when in my sit.

Figures, trying to pin it on me, like usual. Im keeping out of this one since it clearly does not involve me. *Steps into corner*

Why did you mention me @Grace

So....you admit to the nitrp? Unless you can produce some actual evidence against @the coolest beanie baby, I see no reason why he should be punished. Merely participating in a warrant, (false or not,) is not against any rules, so long as he didnt kill you, destroy any raidables, or make you lose any money. Personaly what I don't see is, why so salty?

Uhm, here's my opinion in a neatly organized list 1) He did not file the warrant. 2) You propblock in the end of the video, maliciously shove a prop onto the door 3) Bodyblocking. 4) Build during raid. In this video you commit NO INTENT TO ROLEPLAY, (NITRP), a 2 day ban. (3 offenses.) Building During a Raid, Propblock, and Bodyblock. -1 to beanie recieving punishment. +1 to @John Peepee being banned for two days for NITRP. If ANYTHING, Beanie baby committed failrp by breaking down the props rather than using the search warrant to search. If at all, Beanie could be warned for FailRP, (A level 1 Strike,) nothing more. @IAMEVOLVE You of all people should know that this is not viable proof for a demotion.

A report was filed against agent orange, I was staff on duty at the time. I looked at the logs, saw he had mass propspammed as the report had said, and brought him to the sit. I have no personal grudge against him as a person, however he does break rules more frequently than most minges even do. I have warned him several times against it and he continues to do it, which Is why I am frustrated with him.

What? I wasn't the police officer and it wasn't my sit. I claimed a report on orange and that's how this all began. Never was I even involved in the original matter.

False warrant or not, there is no justification for mass propspam or propblock of any kind. We can't know if the warrant was false or not because there was never a sit for it to my knowledge.

Yes, but those factors are inevitably fallout of what he did, frantically shoving numerous props over a doorway in rapid succession. Intentional or not, he still posed that risk, and should be held accountable for the creation of that possible risk. This matter has already been resolved, and there is no reason to bring it to the forums in the first place @A G E N T O R A N G E. You know as well as I do that what you did IS against server rules, and you deserve to be punished for it. You were given a pardon for what you did and you came to the forums about it anyway. My question on that matter is, why?

No malicious intent? He purposely propminged/blocked to prevent a police officer from being able to enter his base. Bases must be raid able by every type of class, police included.

Honestly, I have seen minges who obey the server rules better than you do. I mean absolutely no disrespect, but man, come on! I have given you countless verbal warnings, two or three SERVER warnings, and had evidence that could put you away for quite a while, and you report me for not doing it?

Understanding? No explanation is good enough to justify breaking rules, two wrongs does not make a right. He DID mass propspam, that is the only solid fact here, he did do it, no matter what I said or how I said it he broke a rule which is punishable by a 1-2 month ban. I was doing my job and I have a right to have said what I said. He spawned props upon props. I have had these issues with @A G E N T O R A N G E before. The day after this was posted, he did the exact same thing and I have that too on video. I have warned him numerous times for rules and he CONTINUALLY ignores me. I am getting tired of his negligence, and I am not going to tolerate it over and over again.

We all know it, they all do it, but it's against the rules, no matter how many people break the rule it's still a rule, and everyone who does it is risking a warn, and if I see it I will see to it that they get it. (Screenshot from my video)