Jump to content

Trollman

Member
  • Posts

    46
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Trollman

  1. +1 Lots of experience Decent and clear paragraph, good grammar Knowledgable You seem like an efficient staff member and look like you know what you're doing. You would make a pretty great addition to our staff team, so add me to referrals. Best of luck! -Trollman
  2. I don't mind a couple of withdrawals every now and then. But this is obviously on purpose and annoying.
  3. Successful raiders (and sometimes party members) like to pull this stunt as a cherry on top to base owners to piss them off. This is unacceptable and should be a warnable offense. It technically is already against the rules, but can easily be gotten away with since it is not explicitly stated as such. Please reply with any thoughts, or criticism if necessary. Thanks for reading. -Trollman
  4. -1 Cons (some will be explained below): Acceptable, but not extremely long paragraphs Immature and toxic from past experiences Kinda stupid ban Pros: A great number of hours Seems to know the rules well Good grammar You are an experienced member of the DRP community and know your stuff, but my past experiences with you have been less than great. You say that you get many opportunities to "keep the players in line and to ensure rule-breakers are to be dealt with," but from what I have seen from you in-game, you do not do that very nicely or maturely... staff members are to be both nice (or at least controlled) and mature when dealing with a rule breaker. Your previous (Perma? I would specify that) ban also shows that you probably make dumb decisions here and there, and some that lead to extreme consequences. This can be easily applied to bad decisions as a staff member (not including unintentional accidents) and can easily make a bad name for you and even the staff team as a whole. These are things that need to be improved on before you can even think about applying for staff. Wait a while longer than the usual 72 hours before you apply again (if it comes to be denied), and use that time to improve on those qualities. I hope you learned something from reading this, whomever you may be, thank you. -Trollman
  5. -1 Cons: Advertised in application Way under two paragraphs Sketchy ban An ok but not great amount of hours Pros: Decent grammar From what is shown to me in this application, you are not ready for the position as staff simply because you cannot follow directions properly and you do not have enough experience as a player. Without these qualities, it is not possible for you to become a competent staff member. So play on the server for another month or two, gain more experience and if you were to apply again with a better application after that, then you would most likely receive more +1s. Thank you for reading, and I hope you learned something from this reply. -Trollman
  6. People of all proudly owned GarnetGaming servers, I am ecstatic to announce that I, Trollman, will be hosting this year's Garnet Awards! The official award ceremony for all the best people, bases, posts, staff, clans, everything GarnetGaming! We're going to give The Garnet Awards a running start this year by letting you, yes you, the people of GarnetGaming to suggest nomination categories and people to nominate for those categories! So enough jibber-jabber from me, let's hear it from you! Give us all you have and your suggestion just might make it into this year's Garnet Awards! Thank you for reading! -Trollman
  7. +1 A young, but still a well-behaved player on the server and shows a high amount of activity, but please please add more to your paragraphs and brush up spelling and grammar! It would really show your professionality, which will attract more +1s. Add me to referrals. Good luck!
  8. -1 for basically all of the above replies.
  9. Usually, specification comes down to common sense on Garnet (from what I have recently experienced).
  10. Sorry, but compensations are not given anymore. -1
  11. Trollman

    Ban Appeal

    This has happened to someone who played porn in the cinema. He didn't know it was a rule and was a reputable player on the server, much like Diablo.
  12. Trollman

    Ban Appeal

    +1 to a NITRP ban. Seems like there was no harm intended, but you should have read the rules more carefully considering the number of hours you have. Might change my opinion depending on Fetus' response. Edit: -1. Diablo said on the recording he would join on an alternate, which is not acceptable. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
  13. Trollman

    New Rule

    -1. This can easily happen in real life-- thus the meaning of roleplay.
  14. Sorry but that's not really common sense. All I'm asking is for this to be clarified.
  15. Then that needs clarification. It does not say that anywhere in the rules.
  16. I mainly posted this cause I did it myself (I was too lazy to remove the KOS lmao) and someone raided me. Reported it, and none of the staff members involved could give me a valid solution to the problem.
  17. This is a rule that needs critical clarification and without that, it is a huge flaw in the rules due to the confusion it may cause. The clarification needed is in the situation where there would be a sign with both building and KOS on it, which of the two would be canceled out in the RP situation. For example, would the building sign would cancel out and the base could be raided without an issue, or would the KOS sign cancel out and the sign would act as if it were by itself? Or would it be both KOS and the building sign, so the base is not building and the owner can't enforce KOS rules? Please reply if you need me to explain this. Unfortunately, I was in a rather toxic dispute with staff members (whom I will not mention) over this due to the confusion and none of them could properly answer me when I asked which of the entities of the textscreen would cancel out and they just took it as me being stupid for not knowing basic rules (I do know the rules). So it would be great to add clarification to this rule for anyone who would not have read this rule and were to get raided. As I have said please ask any questions about this and if you plan to, please reply with somewhat constructive criticism and not some "hoes mad" type of stuff. Thanks for reading! -Trollman
  18. +1 Good paragraphs Staff experience on Garnet Decent playtime Don't let me down
  19. Congrats my dudes and my boi @Hexane. @The King of Rohan thanks for doing promos but remember the logo next time
  20. +1 lmao you were manager bruh how are u this retarded
  21. Big ol +1 cause levels are gay rn
  22. For those who are saying that changing my mind a day after the sit was a dick move then you are correct. This wasn't my first decision to ban him like this but I was constantly being called a badmin in TS by others and they were pressuring me to just ban him and that "evity would deny the appeal" or some bullshit. I take full responsibility for this ban false or not and I probably should have followed my gut instinct before making that decision. Apologies @gabedababe1.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Guidelines