Zaroni Pepperoni

the reasons warns are like that is because of warnstaking abuse, however if evity does not think of it as too much of an issue then it is fine.

yes, this is my second suggestion today. Thank you for the idea @Preston Vasquez Reasoning: there are many VIP staff in garnet that have done great work, and I am glad they decided to support the server by buying the package. these are the people that make me not like the idea of complete removal. however, there are plenty of vip staff who were in no way fit to become full staff members, and should have never been allowed to. IE: Ioms, DLC, DOC Jacob ECT. these are by no means the rule, however, I believe there is a way to have the best of both the financial support of donator staff and a system to stop them from abusing if they are not ready. enter in: The Rework: When you go to the new theoretical donation page for VIP Staff, you will see that it is now $30, and it is labeled VIP S.I.T ( Staff In Training ) with the disclaimer: this is a starting point for staff without having to apply. you are not entitled to a full staff rank, and you must have the TeamSpeak 3 client and a microphone in order to progress further. higher ranks can only be achieved if you are promoted by a manager+. by purchasing this package, you agree that you are not entitled to keep any rank or privilege, and you may be removed from staff at the discretion of management with no reimbursement for any reason. you are required to follow the server and staff rules or risk being removed from staff. Permissions of S.I.Ts. You Cannot: Ban Warn Noclip Force-unown Refer players on the forums You Can: have access to @chat Jail/Jailtp Freeze Mute Chat/Voice Physgun Users on duty with /adminmode request warns / bans use the report system to accept reports handle sits when a moderator+ is on. use /logs use /roof S.I.Ts are not held to a quota, however doing more sits properly will give a greater chance of promotion. Every 2 weeks managers evaluate S.I.Ts and decide if any deserve promotion (15th and 30th of every month) if an S.I.T is promoted they become a VIP Mod and progress normally. VIP mods are required to have a microphone, ts and 48 hours of playtime. S.I.Ts are to be spectated by admin+ staff regularly to look out for poor behavior and to see how well they handle sits. this is just an outline, and I would like to hear everyone else's opinion on the idea.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I do like the temp helper idea, but make another suggestion instead of putting it here.

that's not a problem that can be overcome with the mic rule. I would like there to be a disclaimer where it states that you must have a mic, however that is up to garnet. but again, if they want to abuse that's great, $ 50 for us.

lmao if they want to waste $50 by "trolling" the server then they can be my guest. if whenever santamyclanta epicly owned our server he paid $50 in the process then we would be kings.

yes. as much as it sucks, the price of denying staff from some people to retain the security of the server is one I am worth paying. also if your family is in such a bad spot, maybe playing gmod is not a good use of your time. you can legit get a $20 mic from Walmart.

nice job putting your signature into your post. ( +1seems active, good app.)

not usually, but because of the fact that you made it before the rule was changed I would not be against it. @Jarold @The King of Rohan

source lowkey pranked just about everyone in this community. jesus christ, this man had more names then an Italian mob boss.

that's because your only on when nobody else is XD

+1 Seems nice ingame, dedicated, good app.

in the last post this was discussed, budda said I agree with the above and it should be discussed more. not only should ts be a requirement, but also a mic, like the rules state. to clarify, I think: A. new Staff MUST use a mic during training inside the ts, no exceptions w/o manager+ approval. B. the question: do you have access to Teamspeak and a microphone? should be split in two, to avoid people attempting to say "well I have ts but not a mic, so I answered yes." it should be two questions: 1. do you have access to Teamspeak 2. do you have a working microphone? C. new staff that do not have a microphone in the ts while they said they would have one in their application, and admit to lying about it or misunderstanding the question, are to be instantly failed and removed from their rank. new staff that state their mic is broken but they do have one, are to have their training postponed until they are able to fix or acquire a new mic. this will function as a way to determine alt account staff, as voice changers are easy to identify and you obviously can't change your voice irl, making it a very good way to stop alt accounts. you do not have to agree with my application of it, but if you agree with using a mic during training to be mandatory, +1. else, -1. if you think the application of it should be different, comment. thank you @Bread God for the idea.

-1 lied about refs, bad app.

no, the first post was me just calling the chad out on his shit, and the second was me responding to somebody who slightly misunderstood the situation, which I accidentally posted twice.

Double post lol.

its netherblaze not jarold. ecks dee

why does every drp troll who think they are funny use huge text when showcasing their epic victory royale? it also takes legit 2-10 mins to just look up your steamid and see your bans. its sorta like a 4-year-old screaming at the end of a game they just lost " I WIN " as if it changes anything. yes, sex is great, but have you ever wasted 5 minutes of a Garry's mod super administrators time?

I am a bit confused. just a bit

why do these thots always decide to do this when I am not on the server? also from netherblaze's staff app: Y I K E ban this lad into the nth dimension.

@Tenser pls r e s p o n s e

@ExoticNinja @The King of Rohan

"disrespect, mic spam, or anything that would not result in damage being taken is not RP reasons to kill someone." that is what the rule says. as such, you rdmed him. no, you would have to take damage.

shooting you would be, shooting at you would not be, as there are many things that can come up and none of them are able to be proven, such as him shooting somebody behind you. getting shot at is not considered an rp reason here due to how hard to prove it is, and if we let go of your punishment, we would be giving you special treatment.

-1 does not matter. if you damaged him first it is rdm. until you take damage you cannot shoot back (unless it is a raid or mug).