Jump to content
DarkRP Rules Updated (4/28/2024) ×

WohMi

Trusted Member
  • Posts

    295
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by WohMi

  1. 8 hours ago, IAreGunner said:

     “I would genuinely suggest if this is too much of an experience, you try and find another game to play that is not in a LITERAL sense made to depict a very dark humor of police brutality, mass shootings, and drug abuse” 

    okay gunner, hopefully garnet's doing a bit, and while I understand that there's a lot of "dark edgy humor crime" in DarkRP, I definitely don't agree with the idea of adding a class that encourages "Predatory actions against minors."

     

    That's just me, though 🤷‍♂️

     

    Edit: No clue why you're cringe-reacting me for not wanting a job class that would make the server more toxic, especially towards younger players. I'm not surprised, but still, doesn't make sense to me.

    • Cringe 2
    • Haha 1
    • Informative 1
  2. -1

     

    As much as the idea seems appealing, I can see a couple issues pertaining to this that prevents me from giving it a +1 currently.

    1.  The abilities of the job listed here are not unique enough to warrant a new job. There already exists other classes can use donation boxes, heal, and base in the church. The closest "unique" trait this class would have would be the ability to own a base and use donation boxes, which is admittedly a bit interesting, but not exactly one that is in high demand or beneficial to the game state.
    2. I don't feel that the Priest should only be allowed to base in the "church building," or that the "church building" should be restricted to only allow the priest to base there. I like basing in the church, and I know a lot of other people who have good bases there too. If this were added, I would much prefer the priest be allowed to set up his congregation in any building he wishes, rather than just the single spot of the church.
    3. On 4/28/2024 at 2:58 PM, Nutter said:

      - commit predator actions against underage church-goers

      😬 

    4. This is less of an issue and more of a general opinion on the proposed class, but I don't think the Priest should be allowed to print or anything. I think it would be funny and make sense if the Priest spawned with the "Annabelle" weapon from HL2.

    • Cringe 3
  3. -1

    - Only 1 Paragraph

    - Wrong Steam ID

    - Didn't Read Staff Rules

     

    1 hour ago, Reddinvar said:

    Have you ever been banned or punished on any server? If so, Include details: Only 1 small ban that was appealed due to lack of evidence.

    Was the ban appealed successfully? 

  4. Neutral

    I agree with the premise of this suggestion. Being able to get the money back if it was taken via any rule breaking seems like a good addition to the rules. I wouldn't have it as high of a punishment as "scamming," but I'd definitely consider it FailRP. I don't think the punishment should increase or decrease based on how much money was taken - If the rule breaker doesn't return the money, they should be punished. I agree very much with @Errol's post.

     

    I've got no clue what @sureak and @IAreGunner 's point even is. Yeah guys, I know all the "good players" aren't gonna get sneakily NLR raided and have their stuff stolen, but this is still a valuable addition to the rules. Not everybody has 5 alts and dupes for bases. This rule makes a lot of sense, especially for newer players. 

    • Agree 1
  5. 4 hours ago, Chawhead said:

    -1 its literally called failrp & LTAP and with the new logs you can see if they dc or crashed.   

    -1, re: Chawhead, also

     

    IIRC, Leaving & Rejoining to avoid a raid is already punishable.

    I recall an older rule saying something along the lines of: "You have to wait at least 30 minutes to rejoin if you leave during a raid" or something, which makes it FailRP. If this is an already existing rule, we don't need need a rule addition. I can't find anything that backs this up on the rules on the forums, but I swear up and down that this rule exists or existed at some point in time.

    • Agree 1
  6. Neutral -1

     

    Love playing with ya FGB, but last I saw you you were being a bit of a minge, so I can't in good consciousness give you a +1.

    2 hours ago, AlexConway said:

    Provided you don't MassRDM again, stop shitposting, and don't leave within 2-3 months again, +1

    Basically what Conway said here. Don't be a minge, and you'll be fine.

     

    After seeing @NotDeadPool2's post, gonna be a no from me. Give it quite a bit of time to improve yourself.

     

    While seeing the evidence that this is regarding the rapist job.... Yeah, no. The Rapist Job is a straight downgrade from the current Covid spreader, and the only reason people would want it back is because "Haha, Rape funny." Keeping my -1.

    • Dumb/Shitpost 2
    • Confused 1
    • Sad 1
    • Agree 1
  7. -1

    Nobody should be safe from random auto-hits. Removing the possibility for Hobos to be targeted randomly can remove a large % of the server. Hobos are one of the easier targets, as well. God forbid you get someone who's been sitting in their Industrial base farming printers for the past 4 hours. Keep Hobos as a target.

    • Like 2
    • Agree 2
  8.  

    +1

    Add me to your referrals. 

     

    Zack's always a super chill guy, and I feel he's got the balance down of being mature and not being a hardass. Definitely would make an excellent staff member.

    • Like 1
  9. +1

    Makes perfect sense to me.

    Also, this isn't an old screenshot, the rule about "Do not RP in Spawn" should probably changed, since we have COVID Spreaders instead of Rapists now

  10. On 2/23/2024 at 4:14 PM, Schyzo said:

    +1

    I think 10 minutes is way too much time, I'm onboard with the idea but only for entities and 5 minutes should be enough. I've had a couple instances where my game has randomly crashed and lost all of my printers in an instant.


    Schyzo conveys my thoughts here perfectly. +1

    An issue that would have to be looked out for is to make sure that someone could not leave, have someone else claim their printers, rejoin, place printers down again, and repeat for pseudo-Infinite printer generation.  But, other than that, seems good to me!

    • Like 1
  11.  

    -1

    Unneeded change IMO. /p works fine enough as is. If you really need to speak to a party member with your voice, just use Discord or Teamspeak. Hell, use Skype.*

    * I do not condone or support the usage of Skype. It's 2024. Just use Discord.

    • Disagree 1
  12. -1

    This would turn me into the most paranoid nutcase on the planet while I'm playing mayor. I wouldn't let ANYONE in my PD. 

     

    More objectively, creating a class whose sole purpose is to counter/kill another class is kinda lame. The mayor already has plenty of ways to die, and the server meta isn't really clamoring for another one.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Guidelines