Phantom
-
Posts
967 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
42
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by Phantom
-
-
I don't want to add Climb Swep onto the server, but I have something else planned for reaching high places.
-
I like the idea for everything, except for the demolitions aspect. We already have quite a bit of battalions that can specialize in demolitions, and I think adding another job would dilute this role further. I like the advanced engineering specialization, just not sure about the need for a pilot class to have a detonator.
-
2
-
-
Your suggestion has been Accepted,
Please note that accepted suggestions will not necessarily be implemented into the server, but rather forked over to the development team for a second opinion, at which point they are free to choose between implementation or not.
-
3
-
-
Accepted, we're working on possibly merging some of the staff ranks to have GM perms to so that you can do both. Sit tight until Garnet gets that sorted out.
-
2
-
-
I'm going to deny/lock this thread. I already know Garnet's opinion on this, and it was good to see many community members step in and help clarify why we use TS over discord. We won't be switching over any time soon.
-
2
-
-
5 minutes ago, PraetorDon said:
as from the way the GG discord looks set up right now, it would be a pain giving out those roles.
We've talked about doing this, but haven't due to this reason. Compared to other tasks Garnet has, like updating SWRP/MRP/TTT/DarkRP/Rust, it's very low priority right now.
-
1
-
-
11 minutes ago, PraetorDon said:
Teamspeak is free for the player to use, while being under direct control of Garnet (he hosts the ts3 server). Teamspeak also has better audio quality for calls with more than six people in them, as well as better audio quality all together.
As for Teamspeak not working on "newer computers", I'm using the Windows Insider build of Windows, which is basically a beta-version of Windows, and TS works fine for me.
Personally, I think discord is better for organizing things via text than ts, but that's what we have the forums for. In the use case for SWRP however, ts is the way to go.
Overall, this suggestion was poorly thought out and formatted. Try to add some spacing/paragraphs to at least make it readable.
While discords for battalions/factions are not allowed by Garnet, we have compromised with players to allow battalion discords (under supervision of me or Garnet) with text channels, but no voice channels (they should use TS for that). I think it is a very fair compromise, but some players just refuse to see reason and decide to call it "tyranny."
-
1
-
3
-
-
I would love to be able to edit bodygroups. Especially if we implement a CT battalion, as they rank up they can add a kama and skirt depending on their rank. I'm just not sure exactly how the addon works, which is something Conway is more familiar with if he could further explain it. If I understand what Garnet is saying, I don't think random troopers will be able to change their bodygroup to look like ARC? If so, I'm sure there can be rules in place to prevent that. It's pretty obvious who is ARC and who isn't.
-
Your suggestion has been Accepted,
Please note that accepted suggestions will not necessarily be implemented into the server, but rather forked over to the development team for a second opinion, at which point they are free to choose between implementation or not.
-
1
-
-
Your suggestion has been Accepted,
Please note that accepted suggestions will not necessarily be implemented into the server, but rather forked over to the development team for a second opinion, at which point they are free to choose between implementation or not.
-
Your suggestion has been Accepted,
Please note that accepted suggestions will not necessarily be implemented into the server, but rather forked over to the development team for a second opinion, at which point they are free to choose between implementation or not.
-
Your suggestion has been Accepted,
Please note that accepted suggestions will not necessarily be implemented into the server, but rather forked over to the development team for a second opinion, at which point they are free to choose between implementation or not.
-
1
-
-
Your suggestion has been Accepted,
Please note that accepted suggestions will not necessarily be implemented into the server, but rather forked over to the development team for a second opinion, at which point they are free to choose between implementation or not.
-
1
-
-
Accepted.
Contact me to suggest your top pick for 91st leader and to discuss the terms of leading RC.
-
1
-
-
Accepted.
I know you well enough to know that you are dedicated to the server and understand what you are doing. Could always use more talent on the GM team.
-
Delta Squad needs to get up and running, and we need a suitable leader to recruit for the other Delta positions (Scorch and Fixer, possibly Sev). I have decided to make an application for it to see if anybody sticks out to me. This position requires full commitment and previous experience is required. Whoever holds the position of Boss is expected to actively recruit for the squad until it have 4 members (including them self), and the squad is active on a daily basis. This will be the first step to have RC on the server, and hopefully will lead to having Foxtrot/Omega implemented in the future if Delta does well.
Make a new thread in the Factions and Regiments section following this format:
QuoteIn-game Name:
Steam ID:
Age:
Playtime:
Leadership experience (on current GG SWRP):
Why should you be selected for this position?
How active can you be?
Do you understand that you can be removed from this role if you do not perform up to expectations?
-
1
-
-
Accepted.
Contact an Admin+ in-game to receive your training.
-
1
-
-
As soon as I saw this report, I was pretty certain of my decision already. A ban for NITRP is long overdue, but I do not think a permanent ban is justified just yet. Hopefully Moldy will learn from this and come back with a better mindset. Bear in mind, you were perma banned on MRP before, so this is really lenient. The last thing I was on SWRP are toxic friend groups stirring the pot. @MoldyHotpocket the judgement of others being toxic should be left to those who haven't been toxic themselves. Focus on bettering yourself first.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
We already have a Jesse model that works just fine. Sorry, but this won't make the cut for now.
-
I would like to wait for Moldy's reply, but my question to you Mob is: What punishment would you like to see come out of this, if any?
-
Here is the ban appeal format:
In-game name:
SteamID (https://steamid.io/):
Staff members in-game name:
Staff members SteamID (/id (name):
Date & Time of incident:
Timezone:
Ban Reason:
How long were you banned for?:
Proof of Ban:
What happened? (include any proof):
Why should your ban be removed?:Please edit your original thread to follow the format. If you are another player that wishes to appeal, please make your own appeal/report in a new thread.
-
36 minutes ago, Dillan said:
BoBoBoBoBoBo Awaits his fate...
The council will determine your fate tomorrow. All judgments will be in accordance with the Jedi Code.
-
1
-
-
Your suggestion has been Accepted,
Please note that accepted suggestions will not necessarily be implemented into the server, but rather forked over to the development team for a second opinion, at which point they are free to choose between implementation or not.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
Your suggestion has been Accepted,
Please note that accepted suggestions will not necessarily be implemented into the server, but rather forked over to the development team for a second opinion, at which point they are free to choose between implementation or not.
-
1
-
91st Lightning Squadron + Commander Changes and Fixes
in Accepted
Posted
Your suggestion has been Accepted,
Please note that accepted suggestions will not necessarily be implemented into the server, but rather forked over to the development team for a second opinion, at which point they are free to choose between implementation or not.