.png.a9b8be27400b6024349e8cfc13921bb7.png)
acer
-
Posts
410 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
5
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by acer
-
-
+1
Not that my +1 matters anymore but people that I trust are saying you’d do well, so best of luck!
-
2
-
-
Accepted
Before I'm mass disagree reacted, you must understand that from a rule standpoint this is 100% textbook Non-Malicious MassRDM. Regardless of him admitting to it, Zqrxz couldn't provide evidence, nor could he provide context, therefore this must be accepted. I am inclined as a staff member to believe your story given that there is no contradicting evidence, and that is the case. Considering that the 2 days for Non-Malicious MassRDM is up by now, you will be unbanned immediately. Please be more aware of the rules next time, hopefully this will serve as a reminder.
@Fonza lock and move please!
-
2
-
6
-
-
17 minutes ago, zoahl said:
-1
There has been moments in OOC where you’d act out and be genuinely toxic towards the other side which has warranted mutechat more than one time
Maybe I just don’t pay attention, but I haven’t seen any of that tbh. Unless any screenshots are provided (not that I expect any from a mute chat), I’ll give my +1. Good luck Serg!
-
1
-
-
although i’ve been through so much shit within garnet, my goal was never really to be known as some elite faction leader, or some crazy skilled player. i’ve always just wanted to be a funny fella that people enjoy being around in ts or in game. not quite sure if i’ve attained that goal, but nonetheless i’m here for the community and the fun times that come with it.
-
1
-
-
Denied
No punishment will be handed out, including yourself (staff wise). With all technicality, given the context, this is a valid ban. Had Tuna banned you for 2 weeks this would've been appealed, but it is still Accidental MassRDM. From what I've gathered the banning process itself was flawed, if you would like to make a report on that part of the ban feel free. Apologies for the inconvenience, but Accidental MassRDM is a day ban for a reason.
@Fonza lock and move!
-
1
-
3
-
-
Description:
Add consistency between AFG and US classes when it comes to slot numbers.
Reasoning:
Considering that AFG is the most recently accepted class additions, US slot numbers should be changed to be AFG slot numbers. As it currently stands, there is a lack of consistency when it comes to slot number. I basically want to have the counterparts of each class have the same amount of class slots. Only gonna be speaking on the classes that do not include explosives/specialty items, i.e. Red Unit Bomber or 055 Pointguard. This is a rather small suggestion, but considering it affects both T1 factions and the base factions, it should probably be implemented (in my opinion).
Classes with differing slot numbers
Taliban Army [T1] and [T2] have 5 slots, whereas US Army [T1] and [T2] have infinite.
Every Badri class has infinite slots, whereas Delta Force Sniper, Commander, Combatant, and Marauder all have slot restrictions.
-
1
-
-
Good shit boys
-
Accepted
Considering that there is no longer evidence and the 3 ban rule didn't apply at the time, you will be unbanned. Just a forewarning, anything even slightly perceived as toxic or malicious towards the server by you will warrant a re-perma. Be on your best behavior.
@Fonza please lock and move
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
11 minutes ago, Nutter said:
Could be interesting, it would surely change a lot, and I honestly think it would be harder to get onto OBJs because of how many spots are now open cause the walls being gone. But then again, I was never a fan of removing them.
-
49 minutes ago, Anmol said:
Thank you for recognizing my professionalism. It’s the same kind of professionalism I’m getting back? Thanks.
(I can’t even read it) SO PROFESSIONAL.
Regardless of what somebody says to you, you should act professionally. You’ve effectively gotten your staff app denied through your responses.
-1
-
1
-
-
I'd like to put my opinion out there really quickly. Most people are suggesting huge map altering changes, i.e. replacing objectives, I just don't think this is necessary. Only objective I think needs tinkering/replacing is Cons, other than that maybe add a few holes in the wall like Conway suggested. The core gameplay of each objective (other than cons) was a fun experience (at least for me), I see no reason to change it. Power Plant was a change of pace, some fun sniping battles as well as CQC areas. Shipment was always some good CQC considering how fun the boxes and atmosphere inside of Shipment was to jump around and fight at. Mosque was a linear objective that you push in, or flank around into, providing some fun feeds at times as well as some fun last minute war clenches. Construction though, I do think needs a change. Either replace the objective, or lower it. Personally, I opt for lowering it. Other than that, the only changes I see necessary are QOL changes, such as nerfing OP spots that tipped the scale one way when it comes to balance of combat. Whether anybody agrees with this or not, I don't think hugely altering the map will be beneficial, and it might even harm considering how much would need to change. I also think that there's a decent alternative to this.
a. Garnet adds QOL changes, nerfs cons, and adds a couple holes in the Arches, and then makes a SECOND VERSION including much more in depth changes, so that in the case of the map being hated it can be hot swapped for a new version.
b. Garnet chooses one of the above, and hopes for the best.
-
1
-
-
Ban Appeal
in Denied
This was 13 days ago
-
-1
Not nearly two paragraphs, as well as you sort of just being here. In the past, people who don’t make themself acquainted with the community outside of their faction/friends tend to be the staff that end up leaving after a month or two. This is a reoccurring theme that happens like actually all the time, so until you get more acquainted with more than just select members on Tali, I can’t really support this. Best of luck!
-
1
-
1
-
6
-
-
On 10/20/2021 at 2:15 AM, Milky said:
Edit : I've seen Zed on the server (obviously) but have never seen any of the other commenters on in my 1,000 hours... I understand they may have differing names from server to forum but I have no recollection of any of them on the server at any point.
Just for clarification, this app was originally posted in the DarkRP section (on accident). Most of those people were from DarkRP, the replies have been hidden since. I don’t really have an opinion towards your app XL D, but best of luck!
-
1
-
2
-
-
-1
Consistently acts like an idiot in game. Not somebody I’m comfortable having on the GM team personally.
-
1
-
-
29 minutes ago, Aether said:
+1
I love CQC so im voting Omega
but i got 1 question, When is this going to take place?This is a suggestion, whether it even takes place at all is up to Garnet, but preferably soon.
-
4 hours ago, Aether said:
The fact that i haven't responded to this yet is astonishing, i will omega +1 this where do i start, the Event ideas are great, you are great, you were T.admin which means you at one time had access to GM class so i don't see why shouldn't get accepted, you are a great person you took a break came back and made a real name for yourself achieving Green Beret LTC, i hope to see you on the GM team soon. (add me as a referral)
Goes to show that people don’t actually read apps. This is a staff application. “Event ideas are great”, come on dude, you should know better.
-
2
-
1
-
-
Denied
As a staff member, you are held to a higher standard. There does not need to be a report and a sit to be warned for a wrongdoing, as quoted in the staff punishment guideline: "You may punish someone that breaks a rule in front of you (provided you have the evidence). You don't always need a sit to do your job as a staff member."
@Fonza please lock and move!
-
1
-
1
-
-
TV part was actually made so well lol, fuck dream tho
-
1
-
3
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Description:
Change the current MRP map to a different placeholder map while Taiga is in the making.
Reasoning:
From what I’ve seen, the general consensus is that most of the people currently playing MRP are getting tired of the current map. Although we’ve loved Delta and appreciate the work that was put into it, it’s starting to get stale, and the gameplay is becoming repetitive for both sides. We would love to see Taiga implemented, but to my knowledge that will take quite a while. If it won't take a while, honestly this suggestion is useless, but from what I've been told it's gonna take a minute for Taiga to be implemented. This is simply suggesting that we move to another map in place of Delta while Taiga is in the making, just to keep everything fresh for a while. Doesn’t have to be a huge ordeal, just a map change for a few to keep people interested. This is a community effort, the poll will be posted above. If you would like to stay on the current map until Taiga, vote Delta. Every map that was in the original vote will be in this one.
Map Showcase Below
-
15
-
I too take part in football practice at the age of 23
-
3
-
-
-
Denied
Ban is up in literally 10 minutes, and Garnet won't get to this in time.
@AlexConway lock and move!
-
1
-
-
56 minutes ago, PrisonNightmare said:
I’ll +1 except for the following I have some disputes/questions about:
1. Why are we banning people for being intoxicated on the server for? This doesn’t make any sense to me, if they break a rule then just give them the punishment needed. Doesn’t really make any sense to ban someone just for being drunk or high while on the server.
2. Consensual RDM is probably the dumbest rule that no one (included staff) follows. It is almost never enforced and I guarantee 99% of the people on the server are okay with consensual rdm, it just doesn’t make any sense to ban it. Most staff don’t even follow the rule currently lmao. I say just remove it altogether.
3. I personally think the base camp rule needs to be reverted to what it was before before but that’s another topic completely.
4. Clan tag rule is confusing, doesn’t make any sense to ban them. They’ve never been a problem before afaik, no idea why this would become a rule.
these are just my thoughts, most of these changes make sense so I’d love to see most of these implemented.
Every rule that you've stated was already a rule besides the intoxicated one, which Jake has stated several times that we can ban for that reason. Red rules are rules that already existed, green rules are new ones. Intoxicated/high rule is only in effect if they are being a nuisance, it is to prevent a situation of "oh well I didn't know what I was doing", so we just give out relative bans. Usually no more than 12 hours. Any rule that was posted by Garnet I have elected to not remove, considering that he posted it for a reason, I really only re-worded his rules at the most. So any red rule is one that Garnet himself posted and it is currently a rule, so the consensual RDM rule, base camp rule, and clan tag rule, have all been posted by garnet, and I assume that all of them have some sort of basis considering that it's something he posted.
It's that time of the month again! (COMMISSIONS OPEN FOR FREE!)
in Creative Corner
Posted
me yelling in war (a really over-exaggerated fat man yelling in war)