Can we not jump to conclusions now, especially without concrete evidence? I don't know what the purpose of this response was other than it being prejudiced and a thoughtless opinion.
How is the way that I worded this is an admission of guilt? It's only my opinion and nothing else.
No, hacking the server found suspicious files, but you're not going to question the validity of them or ask for what exactly was discovered?
I apologize for not specifying in the original post, I did stream my screen to Aidan on two separate occasions, once to see my in game screen, and another to see my game files. After that I did get off for the night.
I didn’t respond to OOC accusations because I didn’t want to give those people the reaction they wanted. Also, I went AFK because I had IRL activities.
How could you "know "I was hacking if you did not have the evidence for staff? Your post itself has contradictions and fallacies.
If I had hacks, why wouldn’t I use them to win the sims the other 15 times? Also, how would I know when a staff spectates me? Lastly, I perform poorly under pressure and stress that would come with trying out for Green Beret. During war, there’s no pressure that I’m under, but during Tryouts, if I mess up once that's it.
If I didn’t care about my standpoint in this community, I would not have tried out for Green Beret so many times, ranked up to Warrant Officer, joined the Teamspeak and Discord, and be active within the community.
The problem is with the evidence itself and not the way that it was obtained. In Garcia’s Ban Appeal, Finger Nugget stated that “I can say right now he wasn't using external assistance I ran the lua stealer several times and not once did it pick up anyone else's luas apart from jammy.” And yet, Garcia was banned. Also, Ozzy stated that “I’ve tested your lua stealer theory against 3 cheats and only 1 showed.” on Garcia’s Ban Appeal. Is the evidence truly incriminating considering the unreliability of lua grabbers?