Jump to content
DarkRP Rules Updated (4/28/2024) ×

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Today
  2. That’s the thing, if it’s no written in the f4 rules it’s clearly a sign that there are no time limitations which makes total sense. Back then, the only reason a player would decide not to shoot back their attacker was the logs system would reset making it complicated. Now with the new logs system it’s not even a problem. It shows there is an issue with ‘’some’’ staff that seem to like to have their own interpretation of the server rules. My sit shouldn’t have taken 30 min + the need for merk to log on when they could’ve simply idk maybe look at the server rules? If I didn’t call for a higher up aka merk didn’t come to the rescue I would’ve been either warned or jailed for something I knew wasn’t against the rules. Now imagine you’re a new player and don’t have easy access to merkio, well you’re most likely getting false jailed or warned. That’s the real problem.
  3. For the record, I don't disagree with you. My only point is that every person may have a different idea of an amount of time that fits within an RP situation because it's not written and is left up to interpretation from the players involved in RP and the staff who have to deal with sits. If I was told 2 years ago by an admin it was around 3 minutes and never heard or read anything since then, and you Gunnar as recent staff on the server enforced otherwise, then theres just needs to be better communication that doesn't need to be on the forums and can be likely be resolved in the staff discord or brought up at their next staff meeting so Merk doesn't need to add micromanaging rules on the server. Even @Vortex's -1 response sounds valid and within RP and I don't disagree with. But doesn't yours and Vortex's responses to me "assuming" something that I was told by an admin show that perhaps show that theres an issue within the suggestion or staff communication or training?
  4. We'll see ya Martian, you got this dude.
  5. no escape. JK you were here when i first became staff and helped me a lot and were a pretty cool guy gonna miss you gl
  6. Good luck! you can do this martian!
  7. DENIED Unfortunately, after deliberation with the DarkRP Administration Team, we have decided to deny your Staff Application. This decision was made in part due to the following reasons: There's no denying that you share a lot of goodwill from our playerbase and a good reputation among them, but recent events of rule-breaking and poor conduct were brought to light over the past couple of days, which won't be gone over in express detail here but we feel it is severe enough to deny you for this time being. Thank you for the time and effort you put into your application. You may reapply in 1 week from this post.
  8. last two months of semester? haha that sucks mind ends 2 weeks from today. fr though grind it out mate and finish strong. glhf
  9. Hello, My name is Chaewon, I am a former head mod on MRP. I am currently banned on MRP discord, and I was curious how the progression of MRP development has been going.
  10. Yesterday
  11. I mean, I kind of think of it as you’re able to kill that person if he damages you until you die. After new life rule comes into effect.
  12. I'm trying to remember which admin it was at the time, maybe it was Henderson? But ages ago I was in a sit for RDM because of this exact thing. I was told that about 2-3 minutes is a generally accepted amount of time for RP actions for arresting and killing in an RP scenario, like how the 3 minutes for the NLR is the RP amount of time to pass. There's also no reason to be condescending.
  13. Some people love to assume things
  14. Huge +1 - about as solid as an app/dude as you can find. Good luck Shloomy!
  15. UNDER REVIEW Thank you for your appeal. Please allow up to 24-48 hours for a response from a member of the Operator Division. As well as allowing a reasonable timeframe to gather the facts pertaining to your ban. Please note, bans will only be appealed if they are of a false nature, incorrect reasoning, and in some cases mishandling of sit/report/ban.
  16. Denied Previous attempts at charity raffles on the server resulted in players charging back if they didn't win... Unfortunately, we can't have nice things on the internet. Thank you.
  17. Accepted This concept has been placed on the back burner of our development board for possible addition....at some point, maybe? It's a stretch okay. :^(
  18. Denied Instead we've added an interaction cooldown to printers, since players insisted upon using autoclickers/e-spam scripts to automate the printer farming process. :^( ______________________________ Thank you for the time & effort you put into your suggestion!
  19. Denied ______________________________ I feel as though, while the cinema owner and its capabilities could be explored a bit more.. adding an assistant would not benefit the role very much, for reasons stated above. Perhaps we can look into expanding the cinema job a bit in other ways though! ______________________________ Thank you for the time & effort you put into your suggestion!
  20. Merk

    Totem of Undying

    Denied ______________________________ The overwhelming community pushback speaks for itself.. allowing the higher/elite players to respawn after a user finally takes them down is a terrifying thought to me for some reason. :^( ______________________________ Thank you for the time & effort you put into your suggestion!
  21. Accepted ______________________________ We're working on making the rules a new popup which would show up for new players and be something staff could force upon players who are having trouble accessing the page and/or simply don't want to be bothered to. :^) ______________________________ Thank you for the time & effort you put into your suggestion!
  22. Accepted? ______________________________ The bank robber is a practically redundant class, yes, and as such perhaps he should be removed? or perhaps a change can be made to give him an edge over other classes attempting to rob the bank. This will be added to a list to be discussed for potential addition in a future update. ______________________________ Thank you for the time & effort you put into your suggestion!
  23. ACCEPTED ______________________________ This has been added to our development board for possible addition in a future update, thank you for your time! :^)
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Guidelines