Danny_The_Dog

KINDA SORTA ACCEPTED Without the need of seeing the evidence, and reading everything that has been posted in the thread I will REDUCE the ban to 1 week for Unintentional Mass RDM. I will however state that its noted about you not bringing up the issue of /ad in the sit. I am logging on now to reduce the ban.

UNDER REVIEW Thank you for your appeal. Please allow up to 24-48 hours for a response from a member of the Operator Division. As well as allowing a reasonable timeframe to gather the facts pertaining to your ban. Please note, bans will only be appealed if they are of a false nature, incorrect reasoning, and in some cases mishandling of sit/report/ban.

DENIED In addition to not only admitting to it, logs show you hitting multiple people. I'd like for you to know that as any member of CP, you can only use a gun in self defense, meaning you HAVE to get damaged by someone else first If you're not damaged but people are fighting you have to arrest them. Thank you for attempting an appeal, as well as the effort you have put into your appeal.

UNDER REVIEW Thank you for your appeal. Please allow up to 24-48 hours for a response from a member of the Operator Division. As well as allowing a reasonable timeframe to gather the facts pertaining to your ban. Please note, bans will only be appealed if they are of a false nature, incorrect reasoning, and in some cases mishandling of sit/report/ban.

I'll be giving a -1 for now due to not following the format in its entirety

DENIED

DENIED No.

DENIED I do appreciate you admitting to what you did wrong, however looking at the screenshot of logs provided by @AshenDemon it shows you killing 4 and damaging 2 others. The reason for your ban was found after 1 person reported you, after looking at the logs we see interactions, and in your case, enough to warrant a ban. For your information, you don't need 3+ people to report you for a valid ban. Lastly, I also appreciate you knowing revenge RDM is still RDM Thank you for attempting an appeal, as well as the effort you have put into your appeal.

Honk honk https://streamable.com/teasx6 @busterbignut

Hi

UNDER REVIEW Thank you for your report. Please allow up to 24-48 hours for a response from a member of the Operator Division. As well as allowing a reasonable timeframe to gather the facts pertaining to your report. Please note: Withholding information, dishonesty, or otherwise attempting to portray anything outside of the facts, will result in a denial of your report and possible disciplinary action on your account. This will be reviewed by @Chawhead.

DENIED The D3A states "For minor offenses of Harassment/Toxicity/Racism/etc. try starting with a verbal warning." Usually we try to stick to this when a situation happens instead of an insta ban because most players wont do it again. However in your case it was used in such a way that was degrading and derogatory and not being used in a way where a verbal warn would be valid. I.e: punishment fitting the crime You also got banned for ban evasion so I'm going to leave everything as is.

DENIED You already got an answer. Do not attempt another appeal. Refer to: https://forums.garnetgaming.net/index.php?/topic/27230-ban-appeal/#comment-203300

DENIED The D3A states "For minor offenses of Harassment/Toxicity/Racism/etc. try starting with a verbal warning." Usually we try to stick to this when a situation happens instead of an insta ban because most players wont do it again. However in your case it was used in such a way that was degrading and derogatory and not being used in a way where a verbal warn would be valid. I.e: punishment fitting the crime Therefore, I will be denying this appeal so you can learn your lesson.

UNDER REVIEW Thank you for your appeal. Please allow up to 24-48 hours for a response from a member of the Operator Division. As well as allowing a reasonable timeframe to gather the facts pertaining to your ban. Please note, bans will only be appealed if they are of a false nature, incorrect reasoning, and in some cases mishandling of sit/report/ban.

DENIED I apologize for the time it took to get a response, this was due to a miscommunication. However, upon review of the evidence I will be denying this.

In-game name: Danny The DogSteamID (https://steamid.io/): To lazy to get rnIn-game rank: S AdminTimezone: HSTLength of LOA: 06 Aug - 17 AugReason: Being pulled away because of work.

DENIED Lately there has been a trend of people who were banned for dox/ddos threats appealing. I have to treat them all the same. The fact of the matter is that it was said on the account. It cannot, at this time, be proven who was on the account and the proof isn't needed for the ban due to it being outside the normal appeal window. The evidence isn't required to be held on this long and the person who banned you is no longer staff. The D3A states permanent so permanent it must remain.

DENIED The staff member who handled your sit can make the decision to handle it the way they want to, and I support their choice. Not all issues/situations need to end in a punishment, being called "fucking weirdo", in my option doesn't warrant a warn. Lately there seems to be a trend with you, not that you're not allowed to report but, always reporting anything and everything. This applies to in game and on the forums. I'm not sure if its because you're just trying to get everyone you possibly can punished, or because everything hurts your feelings. Regardless, take this information as you wish but it does raise flags.

Don't hold the ban against him. The reason for the ban is exactly that, we were on the server late at night and this guy was really drunk. It was buster's decision but the ban was only for 2 hours and wasn't intended in a bad way.

+ Age - Warns -/+ Playtime (meets minimum but we usually like more) + Referral IF confirmed @busterbignut - Paragraphs - Didnt read the rules The big part of the -1 is not reading the rules, active warns, and your paragraphs. To fix this wait out the warns until they go away, read the rules, and having 2 paragraphs rather than 1.

DENIED We greatly appreciate your effort and collection of information but upon our own digging we have not found these users to be the same person. You have, however, been given the nickname Sherlock Holmes amongst the staff team. Thank you for your report, as well as the effort you have put into your report.

UNDER REVIEW Thank you for your appeal. Please allow up to 24-48 hours for a response from a member of the Operator Division. As well as allowing a reasonable timeframe to gather the facts pertaining to your ban. Please note, bans will only be appealed if they are of a false nature, incorrect reasoning, and in some cases mishandling of sit/report/ban.

DENIED After EXTENSIVE review of the evidence provided by @GamingCarrot, I will be denying your ban appeal. I was on the fence if the second encounter counted as 1 or 2 Att RDM, however the important part is the logs distinguished two separate events. Thus making it two attempts, bringing the total to 3 making your ban valid. It could've been argued that it was 1 because no one died, but, for a single count of Att RDM doesn't need to have someone killed.

Use this format for your ban appeal to be considered please: