Jarold
-
Posts
305 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
8
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by Jarold
-
-
DENIED
As i'm sure you're well aware, advertisement is not allowed no matter the extent. With these sorts of appeals, you need to prove to use you have learned a lesson and in this case it's apparent you haven't. Replying to every comment from a staff member, even insulting them (see quote) is a big no no when it comes to appeals.
43 minutes ago, ikonasty said:do you even understand what im saying?
The ban is not invalid just because the banning staff member has been removed. The evidence still exits here on the forums in your previous report. I agree that in the future there might be a possibility for you to be un-banned but until you are able to prove that to us, you will remain banned. (Trying to act like the staff member made a mistake in your previous appeal doesn't look good on you either)
@Chase@eXg-Buddha@proggy lock & Move.
-
2
-
-
BELOW IS THE LINK TO THE 327TH STAR CORPS DOCUMENTS.
THIS DOCUMENT WILL BE WORKED ON AT ALL TIMES AND IS STILL A WORK IN PROGRESS. IF YOU HAVE ANY SUGGESTIONS, (AS MY BATTALION ALREADY KNOWS) I AM VERY OPEN TO THEM. YOU CAN PM ME IN-GAME, ON THE FORUMS, OR ON STEAM WITH AN OUTLINE OF YOUR SUGGESTION.
-Commander Bly
-
1
-
5
-
1
-
1
-
-
-
+1 I've had no issues with this guy in-game, although i haven't had much contact with him i just came across him helping a new player set up a base and explain the rules to help him avoid a fail base. He wasn't angry, he was patient, and explained the rules with care. I believe he will make a fine addition to the staff team.
-Mature
-Active
-Good playtime
-Know the Rules
Accept this man!
-
1
-
-
Very simple suggestion. Commander Bly (CDR for 327th) Has the holsters for dual DC-17's but is only assigned a single one as of right now. I suggest the role be updated to include dual DC-17's as according to the lore.
-
ACCEPTED
All we know is chawhead killed him alot. We have no proof to judge whether it was RDM or self defense.
@GameClicher1 you need to make it a habit of getting kill/advert/damage logs so we have adequate proof. @Chawhead will be unbanned.
@proggy @eXg-Buddha lock & move
-
@GameClicher @GameClicher1 We need to see some evidence from you.
-
Steam ID: STEAM_0:0:124266350
Date of Purchase: March 30th, 2018 - 17:13:05 PDT
Transaction ID: 6TV13888XB8373713
Perks Missing: Custom Class - Satan
I accidentally bought the class twice in a row, so if this transaction ID doesn't work use this one (it should work though)
2nd Transaction ID: 75S496544J679151H
-
ACCEPTED
The usual response to an accusation of advertising is waiting it out and hoping it still gets accepted. You decided to completely own your mistake and deny the applications possible approval. For that i commend you
Contact a Manager+ in-game to receive your rank and wait for an available HR member to train you.
Don't make me regret this decision
-
1
-
-
ACCEPTED
Sorry for the late decision, juggling work and school. Contact a Manager+ in-game and wait for an available HR member to train you.
-
1
-
-
ACCEPTED
Contact a manager+ in-game to receive your rank, and wait for an available HR member to train you.
-
15 minutes ago, ManInAClan said:
+1 Almost anyone can put in a ban request, this means nothing unless a ban is issued or if it is spamming/clogging staff chat. I don't think you should be perma banned or even banned for putting in a false ban request especially since no harm has been done. Should've just given them a warning or a slap on the wrist because a perma ban is way undeserved.
Wouldn't disagree to reducing the ban. But intentionally putting in a ban request on a staff member you don't like, as an ex staff member yourself, is more then a slap on the wrist.
-
@MsFlees Many people have been permabanned for this exact same reason. Impersonating staff is changing your name to a staff members name, putting in a ban request is a whole different thing.
-
@BigDiddy and people should be smart enough to not put ban requests in staff chat if they're not staff, but here we are.
-
@BigDiddy Yeah exploiting the fact that essentially anyone can put a ban request in staff chat. You exploited it by trying to ban a staff member you supposedly don't like.
-
-
DENIED
You may re-apply in 72 hours, if you plan on re-applying follow the format to be considered.
-
1
-
-
DENIED
You may re-apply in 72 hours. If you plan to do so, you will need to follow the format (on the page previous to this one) to be considered.
-
DENIED
You may re-apply in 72 hours.
On 8/5/2019 at 9:45 PM, MrChips said:(I need to stop being an idiot.)
Indeed. Spend a little time on your reputation and re-apply.
-
DENIED
Feel free to re-apply in 72 hours. (more likely then not, you will need to work on your maturity first)
-
1
-
-
ACCEPTED
Congratulations & Welcome! Refrain from using any commands or going on duty until you've been trained by an available HR member.
-
1
-
-
DENIED
@c0mmunityWillAlways So i would leave this open for the remaining two hours, but you've gotten plenty of feed back with zero change. If you plan to re-apply (which you can do in 72 hours) you'll need to seriously work on your application if you want to actually be considered.
-
2
-
-
DENIED?
So @Yui_ just for future reference, this sorta thing should be made as a suggestion. Feel free to re-make it there if you would like to leave it open to further discussion.
-
DENIED
You may re-apply in 72 Hours.
1 hour ago, dorsalplum said:it really be like that sometimes
No shitpost in StaffApps.
Samsong's Staff App
in Denied
Posted
-1 Samsong i have nothing against you, we get along pretty well generally. Obviously though, you have a few bones to pick with people. When a mistake is pointed out during the application/appeal process (your MRP report) the appropriate thing would be an apology and an attempt to prove to us you realize a mistake was made and that you assume the responsibility. Instead you have a bad attitude about it and say "if they don't care about it why should I". There will be a lot of instances of people on DRP doing things that are against the rules but no one seems to care, it's your job to enforce the rules not judge the enforcement based on players reactions. Not to mention you do have a habit of coming back for a few weeks and then disappearing. If we had a major shortage of staff, i would consider it more but we don't, so i wont.
My suggestion: Make amends with the people you obviously are having issues with, and own up to the mistakes you made. Then you can reapply and it might be taken a bit more seriously (making a mockery of the application questions doesn't help your case). Like Rohan said though, i do remember talking about you being blacklisted from staff ( @Chase @eXg-Buddha @proggy will need to confirm this).