Jump to content
DarkRP Rules Updated (4/28/2024) ×

dbKeeg

Member
  • Posts

    7
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About dbKeeg

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

dbKeeg's Achievements

Contributor

Contributor (5/14)

  • One Month Later
  • Week One Done
  • Dedicated
  • Reacting Well
  • First Post

Recent Badges

2

Reputation

  1. Then why is that not explicitly mentioned in the rules? Shouldn't it be made a little more clear for new players to understand?
  2. I want to make it clear that I'm not just grabbing at straws here. The ONLY clarification/mention of no-collide doors on the Garnet Gaming DarkRP Server Rules is: https://imgur.com/a/2Xo2ZLx "You may not no-collide props to act as hidden doors." This does not indicate that no-collide doors are NOT allowed. Perhaps if the rules were more clear and obvious they were not allowed, this warn would be warranted. Why am I being warned for something not against the rules? However, this wording in the rules is misleading, therefore my warn should be removed.
  3. In-game name: V2 dbKeegSteamID (https://steamid.io/):STEAM_0:1:460125569Staff members in-game name: AustinnStaff members SteamID (/id (name): STEAM_0:1:90553785Date & Time of incident: SUN APR 9 00:04:07 2023Timezone: CST Warn Reason: FailbaseWhat happened? (include any proof): I was warned for having a No Collide prop with Wireframe material not acting as a hidden door. It was in plain sight on the front door of my base. (Image: https://imgur.com/a/xtraZI4) Here is a photo of the base entrance. Please note that the No Collide prop is the one wireframed with white material to make it abundantly clear that it exists, and is clearly the entrance (Not hidden). Why should your warn be removed? In the Garnet Gaming DarkRP Rules (https://forums.garnetgaming.net/index.php?/topic/19909-darkrp-server-rules/), the only mention of No Collide props mentions it cannot be used to make a hidden entrance. I think in this example, 1. It is NOT hidden + actually makes it clearer where my entrance is and 2. Is used for a good purpose to protect people on the outside from bullets, explosion, etc. A rule stating No Collide props may not be used as a hidden entrance insinuates that No Collide props may be used in a different context. It is also never mentioned in the Garnet Gaming DarkRP Rules that No Collide props may not be duped in from singleplayer. Why am I being warned for something that is not mentioned in the Garnet Gaming DarkRP rules? If we go by the fine print, I am being warned for something that is not against the rules.
  4. Perhaps this evidence may help my case: https://imgur.com/KCs7Uhj
  5. In-game name: NTO dbKeegSteamID (https://steamid.io/): STEAM_0:1:460125569 dbKeegStaff members in-game name: [HG] SpaceGhøstBDC FOUR BIG GUYSStaff members SteamID: STEAM_0:0:16379509 [HG] SpaceGhøstDate & Time of incident: 2023-03-30 - 20:57:24Timezone: CSTBan Reason: NITRP | BDC FOUR BIG GUYSHow long were you banned for?: 05-00:00Proof of Ban: What happened? (include any proof): Before being banned, I had forgotten to "/advert Raid" before raiding a gun store. Unfortunately, me killing the person inside makes this case RDM. I am aware of the wrongdoing, and next time I will ensure I "/advert raid" to keep the roleplay experience pure. Why should your ban be removed?: I was not issued a warn or ordered to give restitution to the player, I was rather banned for NITRP by a 3rd-Party staff member who entered the sit. I made the people in the sit aware that I know I did something wrong, however, SpaceGhost (the third party admin in the sit) wanted to issue a 4-day ban for NITRP. This does not correlate to the crime whatsoever, and is way too harsh for what I did wrong. There is not enough evidence to suggest I was not intending to roleplay. I actually believe there is sufficient evidence to suggest the opposite. Before being banned, I had roleplayed almost 2500 minutes consistently without causing problems. However, there is enough evidence to suggest I did RDM. Why not punish the RDM rather than issuing a 4-day ban? This sit absolutely should have been handled in a better way.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Guidelines