-
Posts
112 -
Joined
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by busterbignut
-
confirming referral I've seen him around quite a bit and he's always been great (never minging, rdm'ing etc.) After speaking with him his ban seems to have been a genuine mistake and not malicious. +1 from me
-
-1 Disregarding the lack of effort in your application, I've seen you in game quite a bit and you are frequently minging, rdming or trolling. I'd reccomend building up a better track record/reputation on the server before you apply again.
-
Neutral I have yet to meet you in-game, and am awaiting your revisal as per Merk's suggestion. If you're unable to do so in a timely manner it's a -1 from me.
-
+1 from me + meets all requirements +prior experience Although I'm not too familiar with you, I've seen you a decent bit on the server and you're never minging and pretty much always a good player. Definitely think he deserves a shot. Good luck!
-
+1 from me +meets all requirements. Haven't had any experiences with you so won't judge you for the minge stuff as I have no evidence of it. As far as I can tell you meet all requirements and are deserving of a shot at the trial role.
-
ACCEPTED Thank you for your report. After a careful review by our Operator Division, we have decided to accept your report. The decision to accept your report is due, but not limited to, the following: This report, along with other occurrences from the same day, has resulted in Gabbox being punished and talked to by our Management Team. We apologize for the inconvenience of this situation and hope it doesn't happen again. A staff strike has been issued to Gabbox. Thank you once more for your report, and we apologize for any inconvenience.
-
confirming referral Briefly knew fatgood when I started and he was a good staff member while it lasted. Would definitely agree that I hope you stick around longer this time. Good luck! +1
-
DENIED After careful review of your appeal and the events pertaining/leading up to your ban. We regretfully inform you that your request for an appeal of your ban has been denied at this time. This is mostly but may not be limited to the following reasons: Your ban has already concluded and we were not provided with enough information to revoke it. Thank you for attempting an appeal, as well as the effort you have put into your appeal.
-
ACCEPTED Thank you for your report. After a careful review by our Operator Division, we have decided to accept your report. The decision to accept your report is due, but not limited to, the following: It seems apparent that Lordrom has been harassing your group. Should this happen again please reach out directly to the Administration team and a harsher punishment will be issued. Lordrom will be given a stern warning for harassment and told to stop. Thank you once more for your report, and we apologize for any inconvenience.
- 1 reply
-
- 1
-
confirming referral +playtime +paragraphs +read the rules I've seen him on a bunch and he's always been great to play with. Would love to see him on the team. +1 from me
-
This is what happens when you can pay to be a mod.
busterbignut replied to GarnetsMostHatedMemberXD's topic in Denied
DENIED After careful review of your report and the events pertaining/involved, as well as deliberation with the Operator Division: We have decided that your report has been denied at this time. This is mostly but may not be limited to the following reasons: This appears to have been a genuine mistake on Orion's part. He is still in the trial phase so we expect a few mistakes along the way. Regardless, Orion will be spoken to in order to prevent this from occurring again. Thank you for your report, as well as the effort you have put into your report. -
+1 +meets all requirements +great playtime +paragraphs/previous experience -have seen you troll a bit Overall +1 from me. Not too familiar with you in-game but have seen you be a minge/troll occasionally, but for the majority of the time you're a great player, very kind and I think you deserve a shot at staff.
-
-1 Interesting idea but I don't think this ever works in reality. If this was added, the new "meta" would be to look at the tab menu and see who was "mayor assassin." Even if you could disguise them as Police Officer in the tab menu people would be always looking to see the availability of that class, and when it was claimed, and then be able to piece together who the assassin is. I think it's a fun idea, and reminds me of tf2 Spy but I don't think it works in a DRP server. If there's someway around the implementation issues then it'd be a +1 from me.
-
+1 This would not only be convenient for the players buying the doors, but also prevent tedious door ownership reports. +1 from me who's had to deal with a few too many of those
-
+1 Meets all requirements. Has 2 warns for minor altercations. Every interaction I've had with him has been positive. If he meets requirements for playtime, don't give a -1 for playtime. The requirements are what they are and aren't subjective. Tired of seeing that.
-
Staff App - computer (I had to put my big boy pants on)
busterbignut replied to computer's topic in Accepted
Confirming referral All interactions I've had with him have been good. Very good playtime. +1 from me -
Cheers to another great month, everyone. Congrats on double promo Carrot, and SOTM Errol. Everyone was killing it this month. Very proud of all the new additions to the team as well, you guys have been really putting the work in
-
+1 meets all requirements re-read the rules and realized mistake Have only had positive interactions with him
-
I like this idea. As per Merk's post there's ways to make this happen on equal footing. If the argument against this is that only high level players would be participating, I don't see why events exclusively for high level players is inherently a bad thing. Not to mention we could potentially bring any low levels not part of any clan to spectate and bet. My one suggestion would be to make this a build battle and then raid-off style event in a sectioned off area of adminland so it doesn't break peoples' rp. I can build a preliminary dupe to section an area off and pass it along to higher ups if this is approved. overall +1 but some tweaks and fine tuning would need to be done.
-
DONTTOUCHMYFROG87 Moderator Application
busterbignut replied to DONTTOUCHMYFROG87's topic in Accepted
+1 +read the rules +meets all requirements +paragraphs Have played a good bit with him over the last week. He's knowledgeable of the rules and I personally think he would be a great addition. -
+1 + paragraphs + read the rules + meets all requirements I'm generally only staff on late at night (CST) and microwave is usually on the same hours. Don't have much experience with him, but help at those hours would be very welcome.
-
+1 confirming referral +meets all requirements +paragraphs Have seen Jonnyflame on a lot over the past month. One of the few players I've never seen rdm or break rules "for the hell of it." Has a firm grasp on the rules and would be a great addition.
-
+1 confirming referral +read the the rules +playtime +previous experience I'm not familiar with MRP so I won't judge you based on those infractions. In terms of DRP you've been great every time I've seen you.
-
+1 + read the rules - age + solid paragraphs + meets all other requirements I don't have any experience with you on the server, but application looks solid besides age requirement.
-
Add/change the default laws to inform people about the banker job.
busterbignut replied to Comrat's topic in Denied
+1 Although it is clearly stated in the rules, the vast majority of new players playing CP will not have read the rules of every single class. I don't see a downside to this addition, and only the upside of keeping CP's from falsely warranting the bank for having printers which I see nearly every time there's a banker.