AlexConway

+1 - Add me to referrals. You're an active, dedicated, and seemingly competent individual. Application is fine, but no real reason you can't be given a shot :).

DENIED After careful review of your appeal and the events pertaining/leading up to your ban. We regretfully inform you that your request for an appeal of your ban has been denied at this time. This is mostly but may not be limited to the following reasons: Ban/Warn appeals will only be accepted if they are of a false nature, incorrect reasoning, and in some cases mishandling of sit/report/ban. As the contest is not for an invalid ban, you will be required to wait out the duration of the ban. Personally, I am glad that you are sorry, as that's the whole purpose of a ban - but I would advise you to return to the server and prove that you are sorry for your actions, you do not have long left. Thank you for attempting an appeal, as well as the effort you have put into your appeal. Kind Regards, Alexander Conway SWRP Administrator / Operator Division Director @Ziggy - lock and move.

UNDER REVIEW Thank you for your appeal. Please allow up to 24-48 hours for a response from a member of the Operator Division. As well as allowing a reasonable timeframe to gather the facts pertaining to your ban. Please note, bans will only be appealed if they are of a false nature, incorrect reasoning, and in some cases mishandling of sit/report/ban.

PARTIALLY ACCEPTED Thank you for your suggestion, we have accepted your suggestion. However please note the acceptance of your suggestion, does not guarantee implementation. Server Management and Development have the right to reject an approve suggestion, or modify an accepted suggestion for more practical implementation/overall conformity with server direction. @Ziggy - lock and move please.

DENIED Thank you for your suggestion, after careful consideration and deliberation of the Executive Committee (XCOM) it has been decided that your suggestion will not be accepted/progressed further. Thank you for your suggestion. @Ziggy @Nutter - lock and move please.

ACCEPTED Thank you for your suggestion, we have accepted your suggestion. However please note the acceptance of your suggestion, does not guarantee implementation. Server Management and Development have the right to reject an approve suggestion, or modify an accepted suggestion for more practical implementation/overall conformity with server direction. @Ziggy - lock and move please.

ACCEPTED Thank you for your suggestion, we have accepted your suggestion. However please note the acceptance of your suggestion, does not guarantee implementation. Server Management and Development have the right to reject an approve suggestion, or modify an accepted suggestion for more practical implementation/overall conformity with server direction. @Ziggy - lock and move please.

ALTERNATIVE A suggestion has been already accepted that is consistent with the overall concept of your suggestion. The other suggestion may have been accepted in-lieu of this one for practical use, community support, implementation ease, or other reasoning. This suggestion may be used as an alternative for the currently accepted one, if it does not work out for whatever reason. @Ziggy - Lock and Move.

I sat down with @LettuceBoi and @Python and put restrictions on the tablet tbh - they can agree I forewarned them of abuse will result in it being moved to another group or removed from the server. But as you said, I just put restrictions and have a great group of COs to actually make sure the rules are being followed and not used like a fortnite SWEP, which i could see on MRP. Also the main fact I've disallowed it in combat, it's meant for defensive not "Oh shit Im getting shot **whips out tablet**, barricade barricade, haha fuck you droid" and more so "fall back! we'll building an FOB for cover!" DAMN I CAN'T DANCE IN DB ANYMORE!? FUCK THIS CONWAY GUY!?!?1/1/!

DENIED Thank you for your suggestion, after careful consideration it has been decided that your suggestion will not be accepted/progressed further due to the following reasons. Creating 4 tags and channels for ~10 people, doesn't really make sense. If a battalion gets to have enough people, we will move them to another discord. Thank you for your suggestion. @Ziggy - lock and move please.

DENIED After careful review of your appeal and the events pertaining/leading up to your ban. We regretfully inform you that your request for an appeal of your ban has been denied at this time. This is mostly but may not be limited to the following reasons: Whilst there is no formal rule for "NITRP", it is stated in the rules that a certain level of common sense is to be applied. NITRP is an extremely common term in reference to virtually any DarkRP/RP Based Service. It is not a rule of the server, it is a term used in absence of compliance of the rules. NITRP is authorized to be used by the staff-protocols on nearly all Garnet servers. In reference to SWRP, the punishment guidelines/authorized bans are publicly posted. Your whole appeal hedges to bet on everything in any possible scenario between now and the end of the server is not covered in the rule book even things that aren't server rules, such as server dynamics. You are loading on to a CloneWarsRP server, you are to roleplay as a Clone/Navy/Jedi. That is how the server is run, devoid of being written in the rule book or not.. Everyone must go through training, again how the server is set up. You are attempting to loophole the server rules by claiming rules that aren't actually rules aren't in the rulebook aren't there so you must be allowed to do it! This is a best case scenario/example of loop holing. "It doesn't say I cant call order 66 in the rules, so I must be able to do it!" You have listed many of occasions that have resulted in negative interactions within RP on multiple occasions and have been referred to staff to handle, again on multiple occasions. Thusly a ban is justified for such. Thank you for attempting an appeal, as well as the effort you have put into your appeal. Kind Regards, Alexander Conway SWRP Administrator / Operator Division Director @Ziggy @Proggy - lock and move.

UNDER REVIEW Thank you for your appeal. Please allow up to 24-48 hours for a response from a member of the Operator Division. As well as allowing a reasonable timeframe to gather the facts pertaining to your ban. Please note, bans will only be appealed if they are of a false nature, incorrect reasoning, and in some cases mishandling of sit/report/ban.

DENIED Thank you for submitting an appeal. Upon further review your ban will be removed, and replaced with a 2-Week ban for MassRDM (3x RDM within the span of 5 minutes.) Thank you for bring this to our attention. @Proggy @Ziggy - Lock and move.

+1 - I think you can be a good reliable GM, just don't got stupid brain on us (I haven't seen anything to note this on SWRP, but cautionary nonetheless). The event ideas are fine, they make sense, safe bets I'd say but still I think players would mostly enjoy them. I do like how you gave a large scale, on world etc as opposed to only off worlds or etc.

**Asks for referral** "Yes harry i think some off hours gms would be great to have, you can have my referral" Anyway +1 add me to referrals. Numerous reasons already covered by the lovely @LeKichi

Please refer to #event-suggestions on the main StarWarsRP Discord for event-based suggestions, as this section is for server suggestions. @Ziggy - lock and move please

ALTERNATIVE A suggestion has been already accepted that is consistent with the overall concept of your suggestion. The other suggestion may have been accepted in-lieu of this one for practical use, community support, implementation ease, or other reasoning. This suggestion may be used as an alternative for the currently accepted one, if it does not work out for whatever reason. @Ziggy lock and move.

Already Implemented The development team has already implemented something on a similar premise of this suggestion. Thank you. @Ziggy lock and move.

ACCEPTED Thank you for your suggestion, we have accepted your suggestion. However please note the acceptance of your suggestion, does not guarantee implementation. Server Management and Development have the right to reject an approve suggestion, or modify an accepted suggestion for more practical implementation/overall conformity with server direction. @Ziggy - lock and move please.

ACCEPTED Thank you for your suggestion, we have accepted your suggestion. However please note the acceptance of your suggestion, does not guarantee implementation. Server Management and Development have the right to reject an approved suggestion, or modify an accepted suggestion for more practical implementation/overall conformity with server direction. @Ziggy lock and move.

Already Implemented Thank you for your suggestion, we have already implemented something which covers the basic premise of the suggestion. @Ziggy lock and move.

Done/Already In-Progress @Ziggy lock and move.

DENIED Thank you for your suggestion, after careful consideration it has been decided that your suggestion will not be accepted/progressed further due to the following reasons: Players including myself (Who works 40+ hours/week, goes to school for 20/week), are able to AFK overnight or whilst at work, or once home. The level system is a reward for playing the server, and the perks given with the system should be a reward for playing as well. Donation Perks, contrary to popular opinion; should give excessive benefit over non-donating players. Thank you for your suggestion. @Ziggy - lock and move please.

ACCEPTED Thank you for your suggestion, we have accepted your suggestion. However please note the acceptance of your suggestion, does not guarantee implementation. Server Management and Development have the right to reject an approve suggestion, or modify an accepted suggestion for more practical implementation/overall conformity with server direction. Thank you. @Ziggy lock and move.