Jump to content

Captainswag

Veteran Member
  • Posts

    963
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

Everything posted by Captainswag

  1. +1 very active, friendly, one thing is that it’s 2 paragraphs but you have a really good one that’s long so imma give it to ya.
  2. Ha, see what he did there? but no +1 very respectable and has lots of time on the server
  3. Honestly I know you are harmless as a person. I don’t know why you were banned exactly or why phantom directed you to talk to Garnet. This entire thing was blown way out of proportion. @Garnet just let this harmless fucker (no offense SkaDoo, but you know I’ve seen you as a retard for while, love you all the same tho) back into the community or give him the proof he is wondering about. If there is no proof then he shouldn’t be banned. That’s what I think at least.
  4. 15 seconds for a TP so I’m assuming /home is the same
  5. Okay, wow this post went places. Honestly (and I’m not gonna try and quote things here cause I’m on a phone at lunch in school) y’all think Garnet is an absolute god, he is just a normal guy and generally does his best for taking care of the server. Despite him not as active as everyone wants him in TS and in game, he does a good amount of work on forums. That being said, yes personally I think he should be a bit more active in TS and Jackal did bring up the fact that people will generally shrug off issues when they have the chance to talk to him (him, being garnet). That last bit being said, Garner if you haven’t checked out suggestions in a while, take a minute to check them out there are some pretty good ideas there. All I want to prove is that this got pretty out of hand for an apology thing.. I think that’s what it was originally, this community (and no it’s not garnets fault) should kind of become a bit more mature about things like this. Sorry for any grammatical erroes, I’m on a phone.
  6. She has a point, unless you are actually a harmless retard like myself, think before you say stuff.
  7. Alright I take back what I said earlier, M14 should have its Full Auto removed, because it is just too annoying to shut off when you are trying to snipe. Instead of being a Battle rifle, it should just be a DMR. Another thing that should be fixed on it is its reload, as it is like 5 seconds long for a 20 round magazine which has the ability to run out very fast. Also reduce the amount of time to pull it out, when I take it out, I cant aim in for a solid 2-3 seconds. Lastly I think it should have a slower RPM that should be around 500-550, and that it should do 50 damage. Those are my final thought on the M14 EBR after using it in war, and having to wait at an ammo crate for it to stop doing animations, and reloading after wasting 18 rounds in about 1.5 seconds of accidentally holding down the trigger, I think that these changes should be made.
  8. Oh wait TPR got added back? So... I didn’t need to.. walk across the map to my group member.. Nice update garnet glad to see rust getting fully functional again! But will TPs be on a time limit?
  9. You do have a point but I think it’s not a priority for garnet, I would like it to be fixed personally so +1 for that, but really it never gets voted for. But yeah I would like to see a search and destroy where it works. Like I said before though it rarely gets voted for so I don’t think it’s a major need.
  10. The M14 EBR or Enhanced Battle Rifle is actually fairly accurate. It is a battle rifle, keep in mind, therefore it has the ability to be fully automatic and capable of long range combat. The trade off for this full auto mode is that the recoil is very hard to control. The powerful nature of the M14 EBR also can be credited to it shooting 7.62x51mm rounds, also known as a .308 Winchester. Also to note that other guns like the FAL and G3A3 should (though I’m not sure if they do or not because I no longer have access to the weapons in game) behave quite similarly to the M14 as they too are battle rifles. To further explain the concept of these weapons is that they are long rifles, with again, long range capability and able to fit the role of almost any combat range. I know I’m going off on a tangent explaining how they operate in real life but it’s because I personally think that weapons should behave like how they are irl, in game. So basically what I’m saying is that the weapon is pretty accurate to its real counterpart and I think it should stay that way, maybe make the recoil a bit harder to counter though. I would not remove the full auto as it is a key part of the weapons operation system.
  11. Nice update Garnet good to see that rust is getting some love.
  12. Ok yes that is not breaking the rule, but what you will need to do is go to the link awesomeaidan posted and change this to match that outline. Then you will have a proper ban appeal and will probably get unbanned
  13. Now I’m from MRP but I like to read these staff apps. Entity approved you I think and you seem pretty mature despite your age. +1 from me. Here is a tip, you can also use a voice changer to make people take you seriously, just a thought. Now I quote IronFetus when i say “Don’t fuck it up”. Hope you get staff
  14. I took the honey badger off the suggestion because pencil pointed out it would fit better as a seal weapon or something. It is more of an SMG Rifle hybrid too (well in my opinion it isn’t much of a rifle)
  15. This would be for the sake of balance and it is of course up to garnet to decide, but I believee that the M16 and AK are pretty good. I just don’t want people saying “this will be the new meta” since it would be equal to a weapon everybody has. I would support it being more powerful though. Of course the FAMAS has great everything when it is unchanged, except for the damage which is a mere 28, so if left unchanged- it would be a mid range smg, nothing more. This is why I believe the damage should be like 35 and leave everything else at its default. Again the reason for having it be a default like bf gun is for the argument of it being a “meta” will not be made.
  16. Just saw this update, and yes to the deplorable shield class
  17. +1 I trust you, you’ve always been that mature guy on discord and forums and in game, I don’t think there is much else to say. He’d be great staff
  18. Thank you the main point was the FAMAS I thought I would add the others cause why not
  19. I just think that if everyone could have access to something along the lines of a base faction tier gun but you can use it anywhere, the FAMAS would be perfect for this.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Guidelines