Tayler
-
Posts
321 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by Tayler
-
-
Looking forward to the complete setup for Afghan. Nice to see them return again in a better setup way
-
57 minutes ago, Horseyy said:
-1
There are tons of ways to bring in new fresh & enjoyable gameplay for players rather than re-working the entire fucking system.
There are multiple things in this suggestion that are either false or just in general wouldn't work with how the playerbase has been formed since the CS_Desert days. I will now highlight said things.
This is the first piece of extremely misleading information. and this is imporant to acknowledge so we dont end up making the same mistake again. To my understanding I believe ALQ, Blackguard, and IJU were all removed in the end. And yet this did not improve the playerbase but it wiped players progress from every regiment making more players leave than join. The system you are proposing is quite literally what we have in place right now. The only difference is it isnt quite specified that SSO or GRU is more qualified than the other.
This actually works against you the more diversified each SOC regiment is the more newplayers look up to it and want to join. Having different ranks in each faction provides a cool incentive and name change than the boring consistent ranks you'd have to follow throughout your entire time on the server. Every rank is classified as E-1+ or O-1+. This is probably the least of our worries and not something that would be worth changing anything over.
This, is also incorrect whilst the "Suggestion" to add RU being made by shrimps who has had no involvement with the server for months may have been under the impression that this was the purpose for RU but it really wasnt. Taliban was dying regiments were being removed leaders were being kicked out everyone that joined the server wanted to be US. RU provided a more serious structure where minges wouldn't be the base factions most worried about issue whilst also providing the MRP category with an RU vs US take which is alot less common than Terrorist VS US. The fact that you can be a Russian and drink vodka attracted new players no one wants to be in a regiment getting ear-raped, MRDM'ed or singled out. When Taliban was in I saw and was even apart of a huge toxicity issue that wasnt healthy for the server.
Summarized:
What you are suggesting is that we completely erase everything we have built up for the last couple of years to go back to an age of toxicity, MRDM'ing, and FailRP. There is absolutely not a doubt in my mind that Taliban will become a cesspool of negativity and toxicity because that is just what comes with a terrorist faction. Not to mention alot of shit on every map would have to be re-edited by garnet himself inorder to look less like a Russian FOB and more like a Taliban FOB. Honestly, stop trying to rework the entire fucking thing and focus on small things that gradually work towards a better server. If this suggestion were to be accepted we would end up in the same situation we were around 2-3 years ago having to cut down regiments and Re-work the entire system.
P.S
More than 85% of the veterans who were around when Taliban was still a thing are no longer here and have moved on from garrys mod. if they were still interested in GarnetGaming no matter if there was a bunch of taliban on the server or not they'd be showing atleast some yearly or monthly activity. but, their gone.
My guy, you were banned from the server during the majority of the changes were you not? Half of the shit you said literally makes no sense, and is such a weird arguement. Of course seeing this thread get a ton of community support made you think "hmm, let's just be a goof ball and disagree xd"
57 minutes ago, Horseyy said:This is the first piece of extremely misleading information. and this is imporant to acknowledge so we dont end up making the same mistake again. To my understanding I believe ALQ, Blackguard, and IJU were all removed in the end. And yet this did not improve the playerbase but it wiped players progress from every regiment making more players leave than join. The system you are proposing is quite literally what we have in place right now. The only difference is it isnt quite specified that SSO or GRU is more qualified than the other.
This first arguement is extremely wrong. It's important we acknowledge this. ALQ, BG, and IJU were not removed. They were removed when the change happened, yes. IJU might of gotten taken out but that was because the 3 entry faction system was not as effective from what me, garnet, and phantom had thought it would be. The playerbase was skewed and it was difficult to fill such a diverse amount of factions. Players progress was not wiped (maybe yours cause you were banned), and more people actually did join too? Literally dozens of screenshots of the server bussin with the implementation of RU that it actually killed the US numbers for quite a bit. The RU introduction was amazing and needed at the time. And yes, it obviously is the same system of having base and SOC tiers that scale?
57 minutes ago, Horseyy said:This actually works against you the more diversified each SOC regiment is the more newplayers look up to it and want to join. Having different ranks in each faction provides a cool incentive and name change than the boring consistent ranks you'd have to follow throughout your entire time on the server. Every rank is classified as E-1+ or O-1+. This is probably the least of our worries and not something that would be worth changing anything over.
You're right but you're wrong. Being diverse does not equate to being "quirky" so to speak. Having different ranks, codenames, and all that really nitty gritty bullshit does not make you cool or more interesting. If my rank is Stinky in one faction but Smelly in another, that's not really that interesting because it means the same thing anyways. Cool, it's titled differently. Why not just have the ranking system be the same that way you don't have to try and decipher what the ranks are? Ranks mean nothing anyways, keeping them as closely related and simple is what's attractive. Simplicity > being Complicated.
57 minutes ago, Horseyy said:This, is also incorrect whilst the "Suggestion" to add RU being made by shrimps who has had no involvement with the server for months may have been under the impression that this was the purpose for RU but it really wasnt. Taliban was dying regiments were being removed leaders were being kicked out everyone that joined the server wanted to be US. RU provided a more serious structure where minges wouldn't be the base factions most worried about issue whilst also providing the MRP category with an RU vs US take which is alot less common than Terrorist VS US. The fact that you can be a Russian and drink vodka attracted new players no one wants to be in a regiment getting ear-raped, MRDM'ed or singled out. When Taliban was in I saw and was even apart of a huge toxicity issue that wasnt healthy for the server.
The people who were incharge left and it's why Afghan crumbled because it was basically entirely lead by Shrimps and his goons. Once you took that out, that side was dying. The idea for RU was to provide a change and kind of give a clean slate to what happened to Afghan. Not only that but the server in general during that time period was in a very rough state. The playerbase was extremely low, and quite a lot of veterans and long time leaders including myself had decided to depart from the server because of things like the map changes, growing bored of the server, IRL shit and whatever. The hype was brought back because something new and big was coming, which definitely attracted a large majority of people back and kept new players playing because it was unique. But, it definitely could be said MRP could use a change in it's scenery and current environment. This suggestion fits well and would very easily bring a large amount of players back and hook a lot of people back into the server with fresh content.
57 minutes ago, Horseyy said:Summarized:
What you are suggesting is that we completely erase everything we have built up for the last couple of years to go back to an age of toxicity, MRDM'ing, and FailRP. There is absolutely not a doubt in my mind that Taliban will become a cesspool of negativity and toxicity because that is just what comes with a terrorist faction. Not to mention alot of shit on every map would have to be re-edited by garnet himself inorder to look less like a Russian FOB and more like a Taliban FOB. Honestly, stop trying to rework the entire fucking thing and focus on small things that gradually work towards a better server. If this suggestion were to be accepted we would end up in the same situation we were around 2-3 years ago having to cut down regiments and Re-work the entire system.
Again, it's a large assumption to think the server is just gonna end up a cesspool because it gets changed to Afghanistan. Stereotyping is a general thing, and that's not gonna be stopped no matter what. Even the remark you made; People think Russians are these tough vodka drinking chads! And people think Afghistan fighters are murders and terrorists. This isn't what will bread the toxicity, FRP, and MRDM. It's the leadership and players that can influence that enviroment. Just because the server goes from RU vs US to AFG vs US, does not instantly insue chaos, but for some reason you wanna believe all this random shit despite being one of the most toxic, mingiest and disrespectful people that bread along with the other outcasts on the server. Your experiences during that time do not speak for a lot of other players who experienced it, and it certainly doesn't validate much of your false, and flat out incorrect statements towards not supporting this suggestion considering you're going off assumptions on some of your reasoning.
57 minutes ago, Horseyy said:P.S
More than 85% of the veterans who were around when Taliban was still a thing are no longer here and have moved on from garrys mod. if they were still interested in GarnetGaming no matter if there was a bunch of taliban on the server or not they'd be showing atleast some yearly or monthly activity. but, their gone.
It's insane that instead of actually looking into the suggestion itself, you literally just spewed a bunch of nonsense about old Afghan. None of the points or disagreement you've presented at all reflects on what the current suggestion has. Simply basing it off of your own experiences which again, were nicely summed up in the statement above this. With current light shining towards the Middle East in current real life, it's not terrible to reflect the server towards that. There is now a lot of information being given as said by Bishop towards the way some of their groups and military operates, giving a chance to actually provide more for the server instead of just being basic and going "haha terrorist boom". There is actual content to be had with this. I'd suggest reading the suggestion, and reading the replies you recieve cause I'd like to think I'm not the only one who can attest for what you said to be pretty untrue.
-
8
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
Gamma was one of the kindest community members. He appreciated people and could talk for a damn long time about shit. You couldn't ask for a better person to have a conversation with because he listened to you if you listened to him. I frequently reacquainted with him during my returns and exits within the server and never would of took him as someone who was having a bad time in his life. Even if you never got to talk to him or enjoy his company, this entire community has shown that he was well respected and a great friend for many. He was loved more than he could know and its hard knowing that he didn't get to see how many people he truly impacted by just being a good dude. May he rest easy.
o7
-
4
-
-
18 hours ago, Garnet said:
C.
Bringing back a 3-way or 4-way faction set-up would bring all the veterans back and re-boost population.
When we had 3 or 4 factions available, they were hardly ever managed properly, and we do not have enough influential leaders that'd be able to lead the addition of 2 more base-factions and 2 more sub-factions. If we had some solid veterans speak out and say "I will most definitely come back if we went back to CSCDesert in a 3/4-way faction setup, along with 4 other members to play Taliban" I would most definitely consider the idea. Otherwise, it seems to be all talk from people being nostalgic. More than likely when I/If I switch to CSCDesert, players would cry the map sucks and the playerbase isn't the same.
Definitely a lot of it is nostalgia, and you're probably not wrong that there would be a large portion of people who like, and dislike, csdesert coming back. I personally like the map because it was simple and there was a lot of open ground but solid objectives to play on.
Four-way factions is also a tough call, because you wouldn't be wrong again to assume there is going to be a population struggle occasionally but it always shifts somehow.
I can't really tell if you'd consider me a "solid veteran" because I know you like to group me into a lot of the dumb shit the people I talk to do, but I would actually consider coming back to at least help jump start the process if a lot of people want that to happen.
-
1
-
1
-
-
13 minutes ago, Topshot1 said:
You don't even play on the server. You are irrelevant to the whole topic of the current server state.
Considering that Garnet was the first person to comment on this topic, and ask Jackal specifically in his post to comment his thoughts regarding this appeal because it actually involves his opinion, it could be said otherwise.
Anywho, Honestly wouldn't wanna see ya come back to the server. When I was somewhat close with you, I constantly got messages from you about how you didn't want to be on the server and you always had intentions on leaving and not staying. Yet, you always came back just to try and grab something like the majority of players who come back. You may not be a shitty person personality wise, but you don't hold any standard when it comes to actions. You're just extremely carless.
Honestly just looks like a typical appeal from someone who couldn't wait to leave until you got locked out of the community then came crawling back for another chance. And there is plenty of people to reference in similar situations as this. Hard to keep trusting people saying they've changed when really they haven't.
-edit, okay so I guess garnet was referring to the disagree Jackal gave, but even so this was around the time he was on SWRP. Liked or not it's a reasonable opinion considering he was active at the time of situation. that's all-
1
-
2
-
-
One day ban appeals are pointless. Unless you're reporting the staff member in question for doing something wrong, youre probably not even gonna get a response on it and will be way past unbanned. Also it's a struggle to read anything with the amount of grammatical errors
-
1
-
3
-
-
1 minute ago, Garnet said:
Multiple threads, community meetings, and discord groups. This idea dates back to shrimp being staff.
ALWAYS and frequently requested
Okay, wasn't asking it like a dick either if it came off as such.
But another question would be what does this mean for those that prestiged? Understandable if that's a later problem but it seems like the buffs from prestiging are somewhat obsolete considering the damage buff and nerf (armor). Would the benefits be swapped for prestiging or would the values be highered? -
5 minutes ago, Garnet said:
when it comes to player retention, this is the best the player base came up with
Was there some sort of post regarding the skill tree system that you made where players came up with these ideas?
-
Honestly, I think the first two beats you made are better than the three a year later
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Well, some people did put thousands of hours towards the server and although it's not stated they deserve anything, a reserved rank wouldnt be the end of the world especially if it didnt hold any power at all. Reserves shouldnt be something people act entitled to but for those who have done good changes for a specific faction could have a reserved rank. Its very manageable to remove or monitor how reserves are given out and take away from those who have shown they dont use it fairly or abuse having the whitelists
-
5
-
1
-
4
-
ban appeal
in Denied
You made an appeal but leave both the most important parts blank. Huh?
-
1
-
-
I mean, kinda weird how you were banned for cheating on another server 2 weeks ago and get banned on here for cheating. But a coincidence, right?
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, BrianD said:
Unfortunately not, I tried to get some footage by baiting them again but there are nakeds outside shooting me so... Not possible to collect anything at the moment.
Well most likely the report will be denied or overlooked, but if you manage to get footage I'd recommend editing the post or just creating a new one
-
So, you got any proof with the claim?
-
1 hour ago, AwesomeAidan said:
MRP Community Meetings
These meetings will be for all of SOC and all of the base faction officers on the server
Any player who does not fall under these conditions will not be able to attend these meetings
They will happen every month on the 4th Saturday.
Topics of Discussion: Map problems, Glitches, general server toxicity, and anything else
If it's called a community meeting it should be a community meeting. A meeting between officers and SOC neglects non officer entry players and makes it seem like they dont hold value. Many players could be old, come from other servers with experience, or just players with good ideas who are seemingly shut down.
This should be the meeting that welcomes absolutely anyone to come into the channel and provide feedback or be able to at least hear what others are talking about to possibly add to the subject. Just my take, though. Maybe theres a reason I'm missing to why you would limit it as such.
-
2
-
-
15 minutes ago, AwesomeAidan said:
Seems like he understands that he had no reason to be doing it, and considering you mentioned you had told him to stop and didn't serves just to the ban. Shouldn't be throwing nades in base tobegin with. It's misuse of the equipment and entirely his fault
-
4 hours ago, Gualla said:
Its only benefitting Shrimp and his friend group. (Messed my quote, this was for benefetting who question)
I'm the only person from his "friend group" that joined the faction, which was something I had asked to be apart of and was then offered before its implementation because I liked the idea behind the faction and knew shrimps needed someone he could trust and rely on if needed.
I'm gonna take a wild guess that you're a newer player who feeds off of information from the people around you instead of actually finding things out yourself and decided to pull this comment out of your ass.
-
I'm really confused how you're going to dive into this suggestion to change the faction when it's not even setup? I havent played for maybe 2 days and that apparently means that I've been inactive and havent done anything for the faction. Sorry that I didnt feel like getting on because I wanted to enjoy a different game while I patiently waited for the faction to be implemented correctly. Literally cant do anything without the faction being setup on the server OR the event server which while shrimps was still GM wasnt even on there at all. And again no idea how you're going to claim I have no involvement yet I have my own modules created that I was told to make. I've been on the server practically everyday besides maybe a few days this week because of the mentioned reasons above.
No idea why you're trying to speak for others but its probably best you didnt.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
-
I love looking at shit like this. Wish I was better with cooking but it's always really cool to see people make food for some reason. Always dope to see someone passionate about something. Looks like it was fucking great, and you should definitely post more cooking
-
1
-
-
2GA T1 & T2 are both capped at 5 players max but US Army has an unlimited cap. Are they meant to be unlimited since entry or is it actually supposed to be capped?
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, Covid-19 said:
anyone that wants game play from 2 days ago drop emails ill send
The point of the proof section is to provide the evidence you have to counteract the fact of you cheating. It doesnt make sense to not post it but then say you'll send it to people via email. Regardless, evidence of that nature proves nothing anyways. You simply could have prerecorded gameplay as a way to think ahead incase a ban was placed. The only reason it would be valid or prove anything was if the video you have is of your POV from the clips D Rose gathered and put on the thread.
Also your reasoning to why you're not cheating is sounding like you're playing dumb. If you cheat on a server you like and have shit to lose, I wouldnt assume you're gonna go out and make it blatant. You're gonna hide it, trace occasionally, toggle occasionally. Clearly the videos shown show good enough proof that you're suspicious and more than likely are using some sort of third party.
(Edit) also, I'm pretty sure the whole point of the screenshot of you getting three kills was to show the fact that you got three consistent kills, back to back, with an m14 all headshots and for the same damage. Mk14 is pretty trash, and even for players who are veterans and may do decent with it definitely dont hit all back to back headshots without their being a chance of them cheating.
-1
-
Could just setup a text screen in the cc spawn
-
You're really out here trying to say that because it's not strictly mentioned to not tell people to kill themselves it's not against the rules. What a moron
-
Y'all -1 shit for one grammatical error yet you're +1ing basically a shitpost. The dude is an immature 17 year old who thinks he's untouchable cause he was friends with DRP staff that circle jerked eachother in the past lmao
-
4
-
MilitaryRP Update [09/21/2021]
in Server Updates
Posted
He did already mention these will be in the second part, as well as weapon fixes and adding the proper weapons cause it's not just those two classes that don't have them