Jump to content

Phantom

Veteran Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    967

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    42

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Phantom

    RailGunners Ban Appeal

    in Denied

    Posted

    At the end of the day, if upper staff think someone is cheating, they are in their right to ban. If needed, Gildarts and I can review it to be sure. I don't think there needs to be a community opinion on who cheats considering it is easy to give BS excuses for someone.

    • Like 2
    • 300 IQ 1

    This isn’t cool

    in Denied

    Posted

    1) I've been told by multiple people that you pretty much intentionally massed yesterday but you got off wit ha 1-day ban.

    2) I was listening to you and others in a GG TS channel yesterday talking about your server.

    3) I was told today that multiple GG members have been going to play on your server (which is fine, but it is highly suspect as to the reason this is happening is because you are using our platform to advertise it, no matter how minuscule).

    4) Gotham told me you have 3 bans, which is why I went ahead with the ban. However, maybe he was mistaken because I'm only seeing 2 bans?

    Regardless, this isn't the first time you open up a server and GG members are going to it. With all stated above, I would say I have reason enough to issue a permanent community ban on you and any others that are involved with your community and use our platform to get more players on it.

    • Sad 1
    • Winner 1

    Ban Appeal - Escanor

    in Accepted

    Posted

    Just now, br0ken- said:

    It was written as Mass RDM when I checked it 

    Okay. I wasn't talking about what it said. Communicate with your staff team and find out the cause instead of making excuses.

    • Like 1

    [Austin] Staff Application

    in Accepted

    Posted

    36 minutes ago, Kicks said:

     

    Bonnes heures, bons paragraphes, la seule chose qui m'inquiète est l'exploit mais je pense que cela a été clarifié dans les commentaires? +1

    (Good hours, Good paragraphs, the only thing that worries me is the exploit but i think that was cleared up in the comments? +1)

    Cleared up? If the decision were up to me, I wouldn't allow him to be staff just for the pure fact of he cheated and was banned for it after lying and eventually coming clean. There will be people who use the argument that people change, but it doesn't change the fact that he did it. There should be some level of standard.

    [Austin] Staff Application

    in Accepted

    Posted

    Just now, AustinDatDude said:

    I exploited using a aimbot system and I was banned, my fault entirely, thanks for clarifying 

    Just wanted to make sure that was clear because exploiting can be anything from glitching underground to cheating.

    • Like 1

    Military RP Staff Roster | Month of June 2019

    in Staff Roster

    Posted

    Promotions

    br0ken - Admin > HeadAdmin

    Trip- T.Admin > Admin

    Mark Duglas - Mod > HeadMod (Contact Ethan or br0ken to join a division)

    Ghost- T.Mod > Mod

    Landon - T.Mod > Mod

    Viva- T.Mod > Mod

    AwesomeAiden- T.Mod > Mod

    Gotham- T.Mod > Mod

    Mikel - T.Mod > Mod

    Huskaii - T.Mod > Mod

     

    Demotions

    Hind - Mod > User

    Skye- HeadMod > User (Resigned)

    • Like 6

    [Suggestion] Increase the maximum amount of slots for the 2GA/Army/Marines officer jobs

    in Accepted

    Posted

    28 minutes ago, Ethan said:

     

    Why should staff be needed in something Officers could easily do on their own if they have access to the whitelist slot? Why does 2GA/Marines/Officer need a limited Officer class slot? The change wasn't necessary. Staff can do it if needed, but shouldn't be the excuse to slow down how things run. Staff should only be used if needed. Officers could handle those simple whitelisting issues on their own easy. I don't know where you got "status" from Pencil, they got the "status" of their rank already, the whitelist just has the ability to handle whitelists. Why was it taken away? There was no explanation given besides Special Forces Officers can spawn vehicles, so they shouldn't have a lot of slots for spawning vehicles.

    It's not like factions usually have more than 1 tryout going on at a time. The officer leading the tryout uses the officer class and whitelists anyone who passes at the end. No need for more than 1.

    • Like 2

    MilitaryRP Update [6/21/2019]

    in Server Updates

    Posted

    6 minutes ago, Oatlife said:

    Honestly after playing one war with the new stamina system i don't think it fits very well the server. Stamina feels like its draining very fast, making you nearly walk to objectives and it puts a dent in the jumpy combat that a lot of people learned and use.

    I think the "jumpy combat" is what needs to be stopped, but I do agree that the stam system could be reworked so that you lose stamina more slowly and gain more when standing still.

    • Like 4

    Stark - Ban Appeal

    in Accepted

    Posted

    Despite already solving this weeks ago, I understand how the other side feels. The ban will be reverted, but I do not condone using alts and it doesn't change the fact that some of the clips are still suspicious.

    • Like 3

    Stark - Ban Appeal

    in Accepted

    Posted

    I don't know why you waited this long to make an appeal, even after we talked about it. At the end of the day, you don't need to be on the server with an alt. Most of the players on at the time were calling you out a hacking, and it looks extremely sus. Even if it is not "100%," many more have been banned with less sus plays by other staff members. I already talked this over with you weeks ago and it doesn't need to be brought up again now. Enjoy the fact you can play on your main.

    • Like 2
    • Dumb/Shitpost 5
    • Winner 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Guidelines

  I accept