Jump to content

StillWohMi

Member
  • Posts

    175
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by StillWohMi

  1. StillWohMi

    Rule Update

    naw man, the new cubes are great, ESPECIALLY if there's a duel going on underneath. it's fuckin sweet lmao
  2. StillWohMi

    Rule Update

    seeing as how admin roofs are no longer a thing... yeah -1. I love roof hobos.
  3. if you're gonna -1 him don't be cryptic tell why you -1'd him
  4. +1 Truly matured. Edit: Also, the google doc of Frank being toxic? Not really the best material where most of it is him fucking around in a friendly environment. If you wanted to expose him for being toxic, get better examples.
  5. When was this confirmed??? This fucking sucks I half want it to be fake... R.I.P. Heaven... Someone please post proof in here though.
  6. In-game name: WohMiSteamID: STEAM_0:1:212219498 Staff members in-game name: JackJJ (although darkrp/bans says "Strapp9d" (never heard of them before?)Staff members SteamID (https://garnetgaming.net/darkrp/bans) (/id (name): STEAM_0:1:70210533Date & Time of incident: 2021-07-29 - 03:30:46Timezone: CSTBan Reason: "Mass ARDM"How long were you banned for?: 2 weeksProof of Ban: https://garnetgaming.net/darkrp/bans/index.php?page=1What happened? (include any proof): I was shot on the street, and I defended myself using nerve gas (and a Knife, too, but the nerve gas was the main issue). Apparently enough people got nicked by said Gas that it counted as Attempted Mass, and I was banned.Why should your ban be removed?: I've got a couple of issues with this Ban, but it's late here so I'm going to try to make it quick. Issue #1: The Person who originally reported me was doing it in a joking manner: As far as I could tell from the sit, Bearboobs (who I believe was the one who reported me) was not interested in any sort of formal punishment. I've seen Bearboobs mess around before with behavior that could possibly be considered RDM, but with both parties knowing that it was light-hearted fun, and I don't feel that they would try to push for me to get banned. Nobody besides Bearboobs reported me, which makes me believe that either they didn't care/did it due to my second issue.... Issue #2: Deliberate Entry Into the Nerve Gas: While the Nerve gas was on the street, there was still quite a bit of space to maneuever around it/ avoid it. From what I saw, I saw at least ONE person deliberately running into it. I am aware that Jack had a recording, and I feel that if Jack were to reply with said recording, it would clear a lot of these things up, including the possibility of purposeful damaging in order for a mass RDM ban Issue #3: Promised Reduction of Ban, Followed By No reduction: During the sit, Jack questioned if I would rather have a 1 week ban or a 2 week ban. I was trying to defend myself, so I didn't want to take any of those options. (After all, nobody likes being banned.) However, when I was banned, it was for 2 weeks, and not the obviously more attractive 1 week ban. Issue #4: Possibility of this not even being "ATT MassRDM:" I never got a chance to see the logs, however now that I am thinking this over, I was damaged by at least 1 person during the incident. If Jack still has a recording of said logs (which I'm sure he does), I feel that there's a chance that instead of it being "ATT MassRDM," it could've instead been justified due to me defending myself, at least against the person who attacked me, thus possibly making it not MassRDM. Issue #5: It was never my intention to "ATT MassRDM": I understand the circumstances, but it was never my intention to RDM. I was trying to defend myself against the person attacking me, and the nerve gas happened to be the weapon that I clicked. God, this is late. Unfortunately, I may be unable to respond for most of tomorrow, due to travelling reasons. I'll try to get my hands on a laptop (or test out the mobile version of Garnet Forums, LOL), but I will probably be unable to respond. Nevertheless, I look forward to the video evidence, as well as the possibility of this ban being dropped, if not reduced. Thank You. Just a quick heads-up, was looking on other older reports and whatnot, I believe that if I am not completely pardoned, this ban would technically classify as Unintentional Mass RDM, which is only a week.
  7. +1 Only because I wanna be a zombie and knife puny humans.
  8. I like this idea, and I like Clicher's suggestion for it.
  9. No issues raised, other than the possibility that it might become an issue of juggling both DarkRP and Rust staff. +1, but be cautious.
  10. Aaagh, the paragraphs were iffy but i thought you would change them, but after reading Frank41's post... Sorry, -1.
  11. When they're spamming, it's obviously advertising
  12. Had this (Sorta) happen to me before, I can see where aidan's coming from. I once accidentally copy-pasted the link of what was essentially Breaking Bad but in Spanish, and was perma-banned for it, however I did some good old fashioned pleading and begging and got out of it with a warning. I don't think it would be too difficult to check if an advertisement ban was accidental or not. While we're on this topic too, I don't think linking stuff like Wikipedia and Youtube (unless it's your channel or something) should be punished.
  13. edit it and post it

     

    do it

     

    you know what im talking about

    1. Show previous comments  3 more
    2. StillWohMi

      StillWohMi

      not the WHOLE video

       

    3. StillWohMi

      StillWohMi

      let me see the video and ILL tell you the parts we dont need

    4. The King of Rohan

      The King of Rohan

      @Zachmanhe could always use the bullshit excuse of "That happened months ago"

  14. The only memory I have of you is of you leaving after I sold your printers, but you were nice enough to give me them. Bye bye!
  15. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! Let's see if I still got it with unscrambling, then. I will out-type them.
  16. That's the entire reason I made the suggestion, so the rules get changed? Sheesh.
  17. That's exactly the reason I made this post, actually. As of right now, there's physically no reason for Cinema Owner to exist or for that building to be locked off only to Cinema Owner. Calling me trying to explain why I based there "complaining and crying" comes of as really douche-y, by the way. The rules are outdated on Cinema Owner, which is why I put this suggestion. I probably wouldn't have made this suggestion if you guys didn't make a big deal out of my base there, but I appreciate it! Now more attention will come to this topic.
  18. Then we should just let normal classes base in the cinema and delete the useless Cinema owner class. Deleting Solution B.
  19. Cinema was cool back when you could actually watch stuff in there. But now, it's quite literally a barren wasteland. The doors are unownable, and only Cinema Owner can base in there. This leads to a large building in downtown being functionally useless, as Cinema Owner has no function, but non-Cinema Owner's cannot base there. I see two one main solutions to this: Solution A: Get Rid of the Cinema Owner class, as it is useless, and allow people to normally base in Cinema. Solution B: Reinstate the Video Player, giving Cinema Owner a reason to live. (I'm not sure why it was originally removed, so if it can be re-added, that'd be good!) Please let me know on what you think of these fixes! Edit: Solution B had problems that were posed, Solution A is now the only suggestion option. Edit Again: Apparently Solution B was fine.
  20. +1 Fantastic older staff member. Definitely should be re-added to the team.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Guidelines