Correct, there is no consensual rdm; however, what everyone is talking about is that only one person reported him for rdm and you can not report on others behalf, therefore it should be seen as rdmx1. Now, that being said, if even just one other player reported him for rdm, and shadow also killed enough people to be banned for mass and was confirmed to have not been raiding/countering/assisting, so 4 or more kills, and at least two reports against shadow for rdm within the same event, then I can see a mass ban, but just one person reported him so it should be counted as rdmx1. To add onto this when shadow and his friends were rdming each other, dmg logs either most likely wouldnt go back far enough to show the full record starting between shadow and his friends (who again did not report him), or show that shadows friends, the people being included in the "mass" ban (correct me if I'm wrong) started shooting at shadow first; therefore, not rdm to fire back. Either way, if just one report came against shadow the whole time there is no way possible for it to be a two week ban off of one report of rdmx1.
The only thing that is accomplished by banning shadow for two weeks is we're down a senior staff member, which we need as many as we can have on to assist all our new underclassmen staff who may have only been staff for a handful of days and simply aren't ready to handle running a server with an average of 80+ people on a day. We're already low enough on staff with school being at it's peak right now and many of us still in high school or college and getting rid of shadow for two weeks for what is basically rdmx1 is simply the wrong move and imo ridiculous