Jump to content

Pluto_

Member
  • Posts

    665
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by Pluto_

  1. No, he gave me his profile link and I put it in steamio and thats what it spit out. The problem is the Ban list broke, nothing shows even without searching IDs
  2. Of course. I got another guy now STEAM_0:1:46880624 but when I go to ban list there's nothing there at all, like even without searching anything there's nothing there
  3. Yea I looked and he was banned by Waco for reason checkmate, just put the ID in the ban list and there wont be any issues
  4. Unbanned. @DarkAlias I can do this right? for the unban glitch at least
  5. Searched this ID and nothing showed
  6. Basically, think that's what G said so he removed it
  7. Ok so /unban got removed and it broke bans. Basically if you were unbanned with /unban your ban was put back in, a glitch of course. My path to this was me getting banned for reason "Appeal accepted" which is what happened when I reported a guy on the forums and Dark accidentally grabbed the wrong ID, also Edshot was banned for reason "Checkmate" which was put in by Waco (I guess when he banned everyone) which confirmed the idea that if you were /unbanned it got put back in;however, it was not put back in the list when the glitch rebans went through, also as I'm typing this Abides is also banned so everyone that Waco banned is rebanned. Currently Entity and I are not banned so hit us up I guess I don't know who all Waco banned I have SS n all but idk how to size them in this. Leave your ID's in the comments to have your ban updated if you were rightfully unbanned so we don't flood the Reports and Appeals section. They will be looked at and decided upon ASAP. Edit: Here's Waco's ID if that helps any supers' idk if you guys can search to see who all he banned. STEAM_0:1:463410670
  8. Yeah I don't want to speak for Rohan directly, but he said anyone who gets in trouble during the time of error basically gets a pass. Giving them a 4 day is definitely a pass, but IMO literally every person on the server was MRDM and propblocking spawn during that time and it's not quite far for the four people who got caught to get a 2 week ban.
  9. I like you Kilo, but this one is a miss dog. It will be abused and mishandled to the extreme, the vote to demote is good enough against afks
  10. I have a few questions about this. 1. Why an advertisement ban for 80 days? (they're perma) 2. The ban reason says "adv"? 3. Why go for a ban of Garnet Gaming promotion? I get it's not a direct forum/discord/TS link but this man was promoting GG on twitch and if his honest interpretation of the advertising rule was "just don't promote other gmod servers" He shouldn't have been banned imo. +1
  11. Yes Yazzy is an upstanding player +1
  12. Pluto_

    Unban Request

    I was there can confirm +1
  13. I get it but like why should you skip the line when you keep leaving? just sayin :shrug:
  14. @Garnet Please add a "Shocked" emoji, something similar to 0.O so I can properly react to this statement.
  15. Yes, I too believe this ban was HEAVILY influenced by snippy because of their beefs and NO ONE should get a mass ban off of a single report because there is simply no context of the reportee's reason to kill the others, could be past kos line, could be just having fun, ect. Shadow shouldn't have been banned.
  16. Correct, there is no consensual rdm; however, what everyone is talking about is that only one person reported him for rdm and you can not report on others behalf, therefore it should be seen as rdmx1. Now, that being said, if even just one other player reported him for rdm, and shadow also killed enough people to be banned for mass and was confirmed to have not been raiding/countering/assisting, so 4 or more kills, and at least two reports against shadow for rdm within the same event, then I can see a mass ban, but just one person reported him so it should be counted as rdmx1. To add onto this when shadow and his friends were rdming each other, dmg logs either most likely wouldnt go back far enough to show the full record starting between shadow and his friends (who again did not report him), or show that shadows friends, the people being included in the "mass" ban (correct me if I'm wrong) started shooting at shadow first; therefore, not rdm to fire back. Either way, if just one report came against shadow the whole time there is no way possible for it to be a two week ban off of one report of rdmx1. The only thing that is accomplished by banning shadow for two weeks is we're down a senior staff member, which we need as many as we can have on to assist all our new underclassmen staff who may have only been staff for a handful of days and simply aren't ready to handle running a server with an average of 80+ people on a day. We're already low enough on staff with school being at it's peak right now and many of us still in high school or college and getting rid of shadow for two weeks for what is basically rdmx1 is simply the wrong move and imo ridiculous
  17. Yea the rank skipping parts gotta go -1 Edit: Took out the rank skip thing so +1 now
  18. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ THIS
  19. You may not report on another players behalf, so if only one person reported shadow it's a rdmx1 in my eyes tbh. Also Snippy and Shadow were beefing mad hard in @ say last night so lowkey it almost seems biased. a mass ban for rdmx1 is false. +1 (and I got them beef ss if yall want em)
  20. Pluto_

    1 More light

    One more light, and one more button
  21. Pluto_

    1 More light

    I would like to formally request the addition of one more light. No reason, I would just really appreciate having one additional light. Thank you for your consideration.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Guidelines