Shin_Tsukimi

I went ahead and did some work on my end for you Olimar, This displays the STEAM ID that format is looking for from you (I converted the one you provided) and the one of the admin that banned you. It looks like a admin named "Stocking Anarchy" requested the ban, and "Wagon on that wheel" simply put it through for them? Hopefully this helps you! Good luck with the appeal. Fill out the format Korn provided as best as you can, and the administration team should be able to help you.

I'm rather neutral on this situation to be honest. Hobos have been using guns larger than a pistol for a long time. The real reason nobody complains is that this rule is rarely enforced. In my experience, the only times I've ever seen people actually gain a punishment for it is for two reasons, both of which tie into eachother. One of which is someone just witchhunting keeping an eye out for hobos who pull out a large gun for even a second just to clip it and report it, and the other being people trying to get people higher punishments by stacking it on top of RDM, or even just trying to get someone punished for defending themselves from them. I've seen plenty of sits where players have demanded that both themselves and the reported get punished as they tried to RDM them, but the hobo used a big gun out of instinct. While in the end, this DOES fall on the hobo (before any of you say I am saying the hobo is completely innocent) there's a certain amount of witchhunting you can do with this rule. The big issue with this is you see a lot of report bias, you can see old players walk around with a sniper and nobody will bat an eye, but if a new player walks around with a shotgun, there may be someone who simply decides they want to try to get this person in trouble. These same people will not report those older players or players they lkke. This turns it into being not a rule that's enforced fairly whatsoever, and just an easy way to get a player you don't like in trouble. That being said, it does make sense from an RP perspective to only have a pistol. I could MAYBE see a gun like a shotgun making sense, but I don't see a semi-auto or beyond making much sense. There are not a lot of reasons a hobo should be shooting people, in fact they really should only be defending themselves after being shot and that's about it. As such, I don't necessarily see a need for a hobo to have anything beyond a pistol from a role-playing perspective. To give my view, I personally don't give a shit. I think adding them isn't a big deal, but I can see why others may see that as a unnecessary change. I'll make a final decision on my own thoughts after I see some new viewpoints. We've overturned other small rules like this, such as hitmen not being able to base (which they are now allowed to solo base) so I don't think it's necessarily fair to argue rules shouldn't be changed based on how old they are. Rules should be changed based on what the player base wants, not what they wanted years ago. This is why suggestions exist.

-1, Hama sums it up well, however I would also like to point something out. Dahli, we've hung out on the server a bit, and I think you are pretty fun to be around, but im not sure how youd be on the team. Despite this though, I think you should spend some time making a name amongst the staff team, ESPECIALLY due to your bans. Even 1 mass RDM ban can make things a bit shaky, but 4 especially means you need to PROVE you've changed since you were banned. I think you could possibly have some potential, but I think you should prove yourself. Not just to me, but to other staff members, so they can vouch for you. With the right amount of determination and if you give it some time, I could see it happening one day, just not right now bud. Good luck though! To all people commenting on his age, I agree, 13 can be a red flag, but an interesting thing to point out is while I was a manager for a long time and even before that, I've met 13 year olds who were WAY more mature than full grown adults ive met on drp. It really just depends. Give him a chance to prove himself to you all, so maybe the next time he applies, he just might get it. Good luck buddy.

Hello there! If you would like to appeal a warn, please fill out this format and explain what warn in particular you are trying to get removed and why. Also, after gaining a large amount of warns (I think 8-10 maybe?) you get autobanned 1 day if you gain another one. Warns go away after 2 weeks, and you cannot be permanently banned for warns. Hopefully this information is helpful for you!

Good Evening Joe! I took the liberty of grabbing your steam ID for you through the profile you provided, STEAM_0:0:611290917. In order for the staff team to further help you, you should edit your post and follow this format: Good luck on your appeal! Also, nice steam profile picture of 049 and 999.

Also I'm coming back as SA, they forgot to mention that >;(

I believe there is a tutorial here to cancel the subscription for guest checkout payments

-1, the whole point of being mayor is being a tyrant. The cool down is there to prevent someone from being mayor indefinitely, however I think it's fine the way it is. One major issue I could see is of course, being rdmed. As fish said, a admin can set you back to mayor, however given some admins don't always see a request for /setjob or are not on, this isn't a solution for every hour of the day. If you have to rely on the cool down, you already lose a ton of the police force at times, and increasing that may make more people quit being police, which can be very harmful if you were RDMed. I can 100% see high level players rdming people while admits are offline, it already happens. Also, 2 minutes is more than enough time for someone else to switch to mayor. Generally speaking, whenever a mayor causes a ton of issues usually some other level 50 yoinks it from them. If nobody does, I don't think increasing the cooldown is going to change someone from switching to mayor or not. You'd just be delaying the inevitable by a bit more time, adding a longer cool down doesn't fix the problem of being able to switch back so fast, unless you go above 5 minutes. If you go above 5 minutes though, frankly I think that'd be unreasonable. 15 minutes can literally KILL a mayor's PD force, and again if they were rdmed, they shouldn't be punished if no admin is online to give them their role back. Making it a harsher punishment or giving lower admins doesn't give a solution, I've seen PLENTY of high level players manipulate their way out of rdm cases after blatantly rdming mayors, and again, if nobody is on to set their job, nothing can be done. Letting lower ranks set people to mayor also just opens up more chances for exploitation.

Hey man! Please rewrite this appeal in this format so we can help you further.

Guess that didn't last long did it considering your banned now. Cya later, I guess. Thanks for ending your time off by being a fucking creep if what I saw on the ban reason is true. Very ironic you are banned for this, and call other people toxic.

https://streamable.com/z8grc1 Tells a guy to "kill yourself fa----" right in front of me, I clipped it and reported it to Proggy and Kingmash. They decided a 1 month ban was appropriate. Given you were just told to not be toxic in an appeal, this was a very stupid move. What I find sad too, is after your ban people were talking about how you had finally been banned after being toxic towards them today. You need to do some self reflection and try not to be such a jerk dude. I'd love to have you around once you chill out! People have been banned permanently for telling others do kill themselves before. Honestly, consider yourself lucky. It's not a light matter in any sense, but especially in the way you used it. Streamable recently has been saving videos for only 1 day, so if needed I will reupload it. Apologies for my bad mic quality.

No I don't, I'm not a staff member. I don't record 24/7, as I said above I have proof for the warn, because that's all I was pursuing. Since you decided to ban, that part fell on you. I assumed you recorded your sits, since you didn't mention clipping it I didn't clip it. If you don't have a video of the sit, this should probably be accepted imo. That being said, This guy is also admitting to going around and continuing to use retard in this sense. It's clear he hasn't learned anything, and should be on thin ice if he can't chill out.

This is, unfortunately, a lie. I will not be commenting further on this, as you can see in these two screenshots these are what caused the original warn. It is up to the admin who banned you to provide proof for the ban itself. Have a great day, and again, no hard feelings friend

I was there for the sit as I was the one he called a retard multiple times. You were only warned once as far as I saw, however I could be wrong. That being said, you were banned for harassment after you continued to say that you meant what you said after being told to chill out and I told you myself we were cool, and we could just put this behind us. To be frank, I don't really care of you are unbanned or not, and @GanjaGoblin I'm sure has proof, along with my own sceeenshots of both times you called me it (once in advert and once in ooc, before pursuing it on the sit roof) which I will upload later if the need arises. Whether your unbanned or not, I hope you aren't going to continue this behavior and we can be cool on the server lol.

I've met kids who are under 15 who are more mature than 30yos who act like babies on the server. Age is a factor, but I'd be more comfortable if I knew more about you. Neutral for now, will change to a +1 or -1 based on people's actual experience with you, not just a assumption based on your age.

-1. You were given criticism, and rather than choosing to edit or improve your staff application, you chose to keep it as is. You are a decent guy, and I have zero issues with you, and was gonna give you a +1, but I can't in good faith if you ignore people's criticism man. If you can go fix them up and make people happy, I'll gladly change it. My hope is you didn't know you could edit your application, because ignoring criticisms doesn't sit right with me.

And you'd also kill off a ton of people playing the server lol, that's the last case emergency scenario

Best outcome, I thought I was getting User Minus lets goooo And nobody was shocked, but everyone was happy.

-1, Chris sums it up well. You broke trust that's gonna take a while to fix.

+1, if this is a viable solution, why not? I assume this would apply for the PD vault and the Bank vault, I'm not sure if CCs can raid the PD vault but if they can, why not the Bank Vault as well? I'd love to be able to stay on my CC and rob the people of their savings, before robbing the PD of their tax money to derive the town of their funds for paying CPs, roads, post offices, etc. without having to change jobs first. It's understandable if it isn't possible, but it might not hurt to try

+1, would be an easy hat to implement, maybe even as a premium hat to add incentive to donate. I think Itd be awesome for any gun dealers/post office managers/bank clerks/drug dealers/etc. Who want to show off wealth while selling shit and preforming services

-1, not needed. There is no actual reason to do this, even for a limited time. I mean, if I was running a shop or even a post office I'd be freaked out if I saw the halo sky lmao. Fr tho, we don't need it.