Jump to content
DarkRP Rules Updated (4/28/2024) ×

Shin_Tsukimi

Veteran Member
  • Posts

    1,627
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    42

Posts posted by Shin_Tsukimi

  1. On 4/22/2023 at 12:33 AM, Olimar said:

    76561198294385902

     

    22 hours ago, Korn said:

    Please use the entire ban appeal Formant

    I went ahead and did some work on my end for you Olimar, 

    Screenshot_20230424_061811.jpg

    This displays the STEAM ID that format is looking for from you (I converted the one you provided) and the one of the admin that banned you. It looks like a admin named "Stocking Anarchy" requested the ban, and "Wagon on that wheel" simply put it through for them?

    Hopefully this helps you! Good luck with the appeal. Fill out the format Korn provided as best as you can, and the administration team should be able to help you.

  2. 5 hours ago, Wendoly said:

    The hobo is one of the most played jobs in the server, and yet, no one complains about not having the opportunity to use larger weapons as such because you have no need for that

     

    2 hours ago, KingMash said:

    Also that would be suck a headache rule to overturn and start to implement.

    I'm rather neutral on this situation to be honest.

     

    Hobos have been using guns larger than a pistol for a long time. The real reason nobody complains is that this rule is rarely enforced. In my experience, the only times I've ever seen people actually gain a punishment for it is for two reasons, both of which tie into eachother. One of which is someone just witchhunting keeping an eye out for hobos who pull out a large gun for even a second just to clip it and report it, and the other being people trying to get people higher punishments by stacking it on top of RDM, or even just trying to get someone punished for defending themselves from them. I've seen plenty of sits where players have demanded that both themselves and the reported get punished as they tried to RDM them, but the hobo used a big gun out of instinct. While in the end, this DOES fall on the hobo (before any of you say I am saying the hobo is completely innocent) there's a certain amount of witchhunting you can do with this rule. The big issue with this is you see a lot of report bias, you can see old players walk around with a sniper and nobody will bat an eye, but if a new player walks around with a shotgun, there may be someone who simply decides they want to try to get this person in trouble. These same people will not report those older players or players they lkke. This turns it into being not a rule that's enforced fairly whatsoever, and just an easy way to get a player you don't like in trouble.

     

    That being said, it does make sense from an RP perspective to only have a pistol. I could MAYBE see a gun like a shotgun making sense, but I don't see a semi-auto or beyond making much sense. There are not a lot of reasons a hobo should be shooting people, in fact they really should only be defending themselves after being shot and that's about it. As such, I don't necessarily see a need for a hobo to have anything beyond a pistol from a role-playing perspective. 

     

    To give my view, I personally don't give a shit. I think adding them isn't a big deal, but I can see why others may see that as a unnecessary change.

     

    I'll make a final decision on my own thoughts after I see some new viewpoints.

     

    2 hours ago, KingMash said:

    rule to overturn and start to implement. It's been around for so long

    We've overturned other small rules like this, such as hitmen not being able to base (which they are now allowed to solo base) so I don't think it's necessarily fair to argue rules shouldn't be changed based on how old they are. Rules should be changed based on what the player base wants, not what they wanted years ago. This is why suggestions exist.

    • Informative 1
  3. -1, 

    3 hours ago, Hama said:

    -1. Too young without ever leaving an impression that you are mature on me. Paragraphs are not paragraphs. Did not read the staff rules.

    Hama sums it up well, however I would also like to point something out.

     

    Dahli, we've hung out on the server a bit, and I think you are pretty fun to be around, but im not sure how youd be on the team. Despite this though, I think you should spend some time making a name amongst the staff team, ESPECIALLY due to your bans. Even 1 mass RDM ban can make things a bit shaky, but 4 especially means you need to PROVE you've changed since you were banned. I think you could possibly have some potential, but I think you should prove yourself. Not just to me, but to other staff members, so they can vouch for you. 

    With the right amount of determination and if you give it some time, I could see it happening one day, just not right now bud. Good luck though!

    To all people commenting on his age, I agree, 13 can be a red flag, but an interesting thing to point out is while I was a manager for a long time and even before that, I've met 13 year olds who were WAY more mature than full grown adults ive met on drp. It really just depends. Give him a chance to prove himself to you all, so maybe the next time he applies, he just might get it.

     

    Good luck buddy. 

  4. 7 hours ago, 7heManOfTheMist said:

    Can my warn bans be lifted? I don't want to be perma baned for warns and i know that i did some bad stuff and im sorry about doing the things i did but i would like if at least 1 of them can be removed because one of the bans was random and i never got put into a sit and just got warned for no reason, so i got banned. If one of them could be lifted i would be very grateful and woud try to not get banned again

    Hello there! If you would like to appeal a warn, please fill out this format and explain what warn in particular you are trying to get removed and why.

    Also, after gaining a large amount of warns (I think 8-10 maybe?) you get autobanned 1 day if you gain another one. Warns go away after 2 weeks, and you cannot be permanently banned for warns. Hopefully this information is helpful for you!

    • Friendly 1
  5. Good Evening Joe!

    I took the liberty of grabbing your steam ID for you through the profile you provided, STEAM_0:0:611290917.

    In order for the staff team to further help you, you should edit your post and follow this format: 

     

    Good luck on your appeal!

    Also, nice steam profile picture of 049 and 999.

    • Like 2
  6. 8 minutes ago, stretchy said:

    DarkRP is going to be transitioning into CityRP within the next few weeks, few changes outside of this roster may occur. Everything currently on DarkRP including money and inventory will remain after the move, watch announcements for more information to be posted (ChrisRid

    Also I'm coming back as SA, they forgot to mention that >;(

    • Like 2
    • Haha 1
    • Agree 2
  7. 1 hour ago, MafiaTacos said:

    I just read that cancelling a subscription is impossible when checking out as a guest. Maybe don't make it an option to check out as a guest on a recurring package then? Or leave a warning that there is no way to cancel the recurring nature of the package when checking out as a guest.

    I believe there is a tutorial here to cancel the subscription for guest checkout payments

     

  8. 7 hours ago, StraightWhiteChristianMale said:

    -1 although I think this would be a fantastic change, this is DarkRP and I think player freedom should be prioritized over everything 

    -1, the whole point of being mayor is being a tyrant. The cool down is there to prevent someone from being mayor indefinitely, however I think it's fine the way it is. One major issue I could see is of course, being rdmed. As fish said, a admin can set you back to mayor, however given some admins don't always see a request for /setjob or are not on, this isn't a solution for every hour of the day. If you have to rely on the cool down, you already lose a ton of the police force at times, and increasing that may make more people quit being police, which can be very harmful if you were RDMed. I can 100% see high level players rdming people while admits are offline, it already happens.

    Also, 2 minutes is more than enough time for someone else to switch to mayor. Generally speaking, whenever a mayor causes a ton of issues usually some other level 50 yoinks it from them. If nobody does, I don't think increasing the cooldown is going to change someone from switching to mayor or not. You'd just be delaying the inevitable by a bit more time, adding a longer cool down doesn't fix the problem of being able to switch back so fast, unless you go above 5 minutes. If you go above 5 minutes though, frankly I think that'd be unreasonable. 15 minutes can literally KILL a mayor's PD force, and again if they were rdmed, they shouldn't be punished if no admin is online to give them their role back. Making it a harsher punishment or giving lower admins doesn't give a solution, I've seen PLENTY of high level players manipulate their way out of rdm cases after blatantly rdming mayors, and again, if nobody is on to set their job, nothing can be done. Letting lower ranks set people to mayor also just opens up more chances for exploitation.

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
  9. 13 minutes ago, stoneybologna420 said:

    I was sitting at a gun store in dark rp when out of nowhere I was banned for 2 weeks for rdm when I didn't even have a gun yet. yesterday was my first time even playing the game I just got it, so I don't know the controls that well even to go on a rdm spree. also, I thought you needed a clip of someone doing things for them to be banned and I know there isn't one of me doing such.

    Hey man! Please rewrite this appeal in this format so we can help you further.

     

  10. On 3/4/2023 at 8:47 PM, Atlass said:

    so i'm going to stop before i get myself banned.

    Guess that didn't last long did it considering your banned now.

    Cya later, I guess. Thanks for ending your time off by being a fucking creep if what I saw on the ban reason is true.

    Very ironic you are banned for this, and call other people toxic.

    Screenshot_20230306_132617.jpg

    • Like 3
    • Spicy 1
    • Winner 1
  11.  

    https://streamable.com/z8grc1

    Tells a guy to "kill yourself fa----" right in front of me, I clipped it and reported it to Proggy and Kingmash. They decided a 1 month ban was appropriate. Given you were just told to not be toxic in an appeal, this was a very stupid move. What I find sad too, is after your ban people were talking about how you had finally been banned after being toxic towards them today. You need to do some self reflection and try not to be such a jerk dude. I'd love to have you around once you chill out!

    People have been banned permanently for telling others do kill themselves before. Honestly, consider yourself lucky. It's not a light matter in any sense, but especially in the way you used it.

    Streamable recently has been saving videos for only 1 day, so if needed I will reupload it. Apologies for my bad mic quality.

    • Like 1
    • Winner 1
  12. 3 hours ago, GanjaGoblin said:

    Shin has a clip of the sit that he could pm you

    No I don't, I'm not a staff member. I don't record 24/7, as I said above I have proof for the warn, because that's all I was pursuing. Since you decided to ban, that part fell on you. I assumed you recorded your sits, since you didn't mention clipping it I didn't clip it. If you don't have a video of the sit, this should probably be accepted imo.

     

    That being said, 

    3 hours ago, imsoretardedauh said:

    that was on discord dumbass 

    This guy is also admitting to going around and continuing to use retard in this sense. It's clear he hasn't learned anything, and should be on thin ice if he can't chill out.

  13. 9 minutes ago, imsoretardedauh said:

    also i didnt call u a retard multiple times 

    This is, unfortunately, a lie.

     

    I will not be commenting further on this, as you can see in these two screenshots these are what caused the original warn. It is up to the admin who banned you to provide proof for the ban itself.

     

    Have a great day, and again, no hard feelings friend

    20230302184428_1.jpg?width=1136&height=4

    20230302184346_1.jpg

  14. I was there for the sit as I was the one he called a retard multiple times. You were only warned once as far as I saw, however I could be wrong. 

     

    That being said, you were banned for harassment after you continued to say that you meant what you said after being told to chill out and I told you myself we were cool, and we could just put this behind us. To be frank, I don't really care of you are unbanned or not, and @GanjaGoblin I'm sure has proof, along with my own sceeenshots of both times you called me it (once in advert and once in ooc, before pursuing it on the sit roof) which I will upload later if the need arises.

     

    Whether your unbanned or not, I hope you aren't going to continue this behavior and we can be cool on the server lol.

  15. 5 hours ago, WohMi said:

    age of 15 to be staff again

    I've met kids who are under 15 who are more mature than 30yos who act like babies on the server.

    Age is a factor, but I'd be more comfortable if I knew more about you. 

    Neutral for now, will change to a +1 or -1 based on people's actual experience with you, not just a assumption based on your age.

    • Agree 1
  16. 11 hours ago, 4orm said:

    I love you no homo

    🙂

    -1. You were given criticism, and rather than choosing to edit or improve your staff application, you chose to keep it as is.

    You are a decent guy, and I have zero issues with you, and was gonna give you a +1, but I can't in good faith if you ignore people's criticism man. If you can go fix them up and make people happy, I'll gladly change it. My hope is you didn't know you could edit your application, because ignoring criticisms doesn't sit right with me.

  17. 3 hours ago, ChrisRid said:

    -1

    As mentioned in your previous applications, this is a major red flag for me. If you truly had the best interests of the player base at heart, jumping on an alt account to cause chaos would never have crossed your mind. While I understand you regret that decision now, I don't feel comfortable with the idea of you re-joining the staff team, given that this took place so recently. Even in general, I personally believe that anyone who wants to join the staff team should realistically demonstrate perfect behaviour for a decent period of time, given that the sole purpose of the staff team is to enforce the server rules. I don't dislike you by any means, and I'd be happy to have a good laugh with you in game, but as for joining the staff team, it's a no from me.

    -1, Chris sums it up well. You broke trust that's gonna take a while to fix.

    • Like 2
  18. On 1/6/2023 at 7:48 PM, ShankNinja said:

    Alternatively however, what if he just blacklisted the classes that shouldn't raid the vault?

    I haven't seen the code but from a theoretical standpoint I think it would work.

    +1, if this is a viable solution, why not? I assume this would apply for the PD vault and the Bank vault, I'm not sure if CCs can raid the PD vault but if they can, why not the Bank Vault as well? I'd love to be able to stay on my CC and rob the people of their savings, before robbing the PD of their tax money to derive the town of their funds for paying CPs, roads, post offices, etc. without having to change jobs first.

     

    It's understandable if it isn't possible, but it might not hurt to try

  19. +1, would be an easy hat to implement, maybe even as a premium hat to add incentive to donate.

     

    I think Itd be awesome for any gun dealers/post office managers/bank clerks/drug dealers/etc. Who want to show off wealth while selling shit and preforming services

    • Like 1
  20. +1, but only if it won't cause issues to server frames. If it does not, I do not see any real reason not to. People are gonna text screen minge anyways, or prop minge, so adding one or more extra textscreens isnt gonna change that. If staff are doing their job, this shouldnt become a major issue. Adding more than one text screen helps with roleplay a lot, such as in a hotel, or perhaps a post office, restaurant, gun store, etc. 

     

    I especially support this if my suggestion about admin perms being updated is accepted.

    • Like 1
    • Agree 2
  21. +1, I like the benefits for roleplay scenarios like a post office box, and honestly I don't see the harm in one more peek. People already instantly win 24/7 with one peek, another one isn't gonna change much. The roleplay benefits are great too, I can imagine cool builds with a extra button.

     

    That being said, for those who do not want to give another peek, I offer a solution:

    Add 4 buttons, make it failbase if a base has more than 2-3 peeks.

    • 300 IQ 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Guidelines