empty warn appeal

[empty was taken 3]

In-game name:empty
SteamID (https://steamid.io/):STEAM_0:0:540626732
Staff members in-game name:zenmemes
Staff members SteamID (/id (name):STEAM_0:1:198194779
Date & Time of incident:
Timezone:pst
Warn Reason:rdm
What happened? (include any proof):he had no proof of rdm and warned me aiden was there
Why should your warn be removed?::he had no proof of rdm and warned

[aidanpoppas123 512]

To add some context to this situation, zen needed some help with a sit, and empty wanted his warn removed due to there being no video. Zen informed me that empty had previously not argued the reporter's claim so he warned him, but after I got there empty claimed the reporter was in his base. Logs don't provide locations, so he would've needed a video to warrant a warn there. According to zen, empty started making the claim that he killed the reporter while he was inside his base after he had been warned. I was only called in to help after the warn had been given, so I can't tell you how true that is. 

[ZenMemes 157]

You must have video evidence to justify a warn when provided with two conflicting stories by both the reporter and the reportee.  You provided me with no story that would justify you killing him (other than claiming you didn't RDM him, and that I need video proof to warn you) until after I warned you.  

 

[raqi 734]

Denied

I got a vide of the sit and throughout the sit, instead of making a counter claim, all you did was say "he doesn't have proof, he doesn't have proof". You gave no counter claim in the sit which was your responsibility to do in a sit. Zen had no other choice but to go off of what logs say.

https://streamable.com/ixyjg9
https://streamable.com/b1cit3
https://streamable.com/0i81am
https://streamable.com/dvtrlo
https://streamable.com/p4r7ax
https://streamable.com/1t6v3s

Next time, don't be immature and just hope he doesn't have evidence without a counterclaim.

@Clicher please lock and move

 

Edited July 13, 2021 by Papiraqi

[DiegoZavier 612]

Honestly was told to review this decision, and I couldn't agree more with what @Papiraqi has said. Next time you get in a sit try to explain what happened instead of trying to be a arrogant child, grow up please.