Jump to content
DarkRP Rules Updated (4/28/2024) ×

Theos

StarWarsRP Management Team
  • Posts

    358
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by Theos

  1. Placing my opinion here because I've considered something similar.

    In my opinion, in terms of looking forwards with our GM team, I feel Factions should take some responsibility in terms of what events they wish to participate in. If members want to do a style of Operation, they contact a GM to help them make it a reality. This way it is still the faction members' responsibility to keep their faction active and doing interesting activities, and GMs aren't always being expected to come up with all the ideas and hope players like it.

     

    Using a quote from your suggestion:

    2 minutes ago, Dillan said:

    An example being if I was assigned to Green Beret. GB would type up an operation they wish to perform based on information or information gathering. Say the information is to be used to PK a player, a 2LT for example. The GM would look at the OP plan, discuss what the options are for it, and approve a final copy. The final copy would be oberseved by the Head GM, depending on what it is, and it would be executed by the Soc team and GM. A GM could set disguises to enter the base to allow for a spotter, make a nest for a sniper to observe from, and execute the player during a peace time.

    This section I already completely agree with, however specifically assigning GMs is the part I'm not sure about. If you took out the bit saying assigned to Green Beret, GMs and Officers could potentially do more as they wouldn't need to organise it with a specific GM, just any available GM.

    • Agree 1
  2. Just going to note that evidence on its own is literally nothing, the warn is only remaining because he stated in his appeal that he didn't value his life.

    (Apparently there's a longer clip but it wasn't posted for some moronic reason)

     

    Also, claiming some names 'are obviously fake' @Soappppp in this case was just metagaming because we do get some bizarre names that, if true, you wouldn't have followed with disbelief.

    • Dumb/Shitpost 1
    • Haha 2
  3. Locked until someone relevant needs to comment

    28 minutes ago, PappaEric said:

    "Exploiting bans for fast fire require a picture of logs showing them hitting twice within one second and a video showing what happened."

    Outdated rule I cant physically edit

    • Like 1
    • Dumb/Shitpost 1
  4. Bases (carrying over from proggys comment)

    Underground areas that would contain the SOC bunks and a war room. Overground would contain Base Faction bunks, DB, Jail and everything else

     

    Construction (in your second image)

    Should be reduced to a maximum of 3 floors, will be useful to those who can use it well but won't just be an 'easy sniping spot'

     

    Random Areas on the Map

    Comms - I know it's a frequent feature on maps but its useful for tryouts and Breach and Clear certification

    Wood Cabin - You mentioned on TS the addition of dense trees, and I feel there should be little clearings with things in them, such as wooden cabins like here.

    • Like 1
    • Agree 3
  5.   

    On 2/19/2019 at 1:40 AM, evity said:

    In-game name:
    SteamID (https://steamid.io/):
    Staff members in-game name:
    Staff members SteamID (/id (name):
    Date & Time of incident:
    Timezone:
    Ban Reason:
    How long were you banned for?:
    Proof of Ban:
    What happened? (include any proof):
    Why should your ban be removed?:

     

    Please correct your Appeal to match this format, otherwise the appeal's going to be denied.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Guidelines