HtmlRoot

In-game name: None (never joined) SteamID (https://steamid.io/): STEAM_0:1:127357723 Staff members in-game name: Proggy Staff members SteamID (/id (name): Proggy (not logged in the swrp ban list) Date & Time of incident: 2023 Timezone:CST Ban Reason: community ban How long were you banned for?: Proof of Ban: https://imgur.com/a/AWmPsi5 What happened? (include any proof): I sent proggy's publicly available face to his DM's and was promptly permabanned. I did so out of reaction to him raiding me for not taking reports when there were a lot of staff on anyways. Why should your ban be removed?: The community ban was appealed and It was lifted atleast in DarkRP. I'm an avid Star Wars fan and have played other servers such as Superior Servers. It would be worthwhile to have me around as a roleplayer as Star Wars is one of my main favorites.

we didnt talk much, but the few conversations we had together were fun and well remembered. i hope you have a nice life wherever it may take you. chug along brother.

-1, i love surprising players who damaged me for no reason 5 minutes later with a dlore to the back of their head.

if only bro joined the ancient universe genre in roblox there are some corners of that game that even to this day are considered toxic and harmful to sensitive people. i get your point though. on another note, +1 good job idea

I didn't really interact with you much but thanks for everything you did in staff and I wish you well.

Quite an odd choice of words to describe how I feel about the rule. I just think as the server evolves over times, some things can change even if the OG's think it wouldn't be beneficial or have any lasting effect. I wouldn't say I'm "salty" over the rule, but I feel it to not really have anything that does good for the server. Other then realism, which isn't really a thing on this server I mean for gods sake we have Venom and Spiderman. To each their own I suppose. Yea but a lot of those weapon restrictions were most likely implemented to serve as a "meta" which in my opinion doesn't really do much for the server considering those same classes can't participate in the same stuff as raiding classes and other classes. for the most part I don't get what your saying. How would this remove any role-play from the server? If anything it opens the door for more role-play, just different then what the status quo would have you with. Most of the times its enforced is when someone who's played the server long enough to know all the rules big or small, and its when that person just wants to get someone further in trouble because they don't like the person or some other reason. Nobody really reports it outside of that. Now your just nitpicking my philosophy as if its all or none. You have to look at it from an open-minded perspective and not a narrow minded traditionalist perspective.

While there might not be a problem with the rule, there is no reason change cannot happen. Change can be good even when it affects something that isn't controversial or a problem. I feel like some people just don't like the idea of seeing hobo's running around with rifles and thats the norm, but I feel like mayors could simply impose unlicensed weapon laws to fix that. I feel its an in-roleplay issue to solve a thing like that and changing this rule might spice up the roleplay factor of the server significantly, especially for law enforcement. Edit: Also I don't quite see how in any of my statements that id been toxic. Never called anybody any bad names, slurred at anybody or otherwise yelled at anyone. Feel free to repfuck me more please. I'll continue to defend my suggestions and have intelligent debate.

So if the immersion of DarkRP (specifically Garnets Darkrp) isn't meant to be based on the realism of real life or a facet of reality portrayed through movies (superheroes and villain jobs) that have our real world, then what is DarkRP's world based on? The very core concept of DarkRP is centered around roleplaying as a job in a city/town/neighborhood as it were in a set period of history. Modified versions of DarkRP might be based on World War 2 times, and they have their own set of immersion policies. I see no reason why it can't be changed just because you contrarians hate change and want to stay traditional. Because ADVDUPE said that there's "discrepancies" between jobs, so settle down big man. I felt the need to do that because I am weighing the balances of different rules on jobs and what might offset that delicate balance. I'm defending my suggestion as I'm allowed to so it sounds like your not happy I'm refuting y'all in a proper manner. Why does a roleplay scenario have to be so mundane and simple? Your the type of buzzkill mentality person that ruins the joy of DarkRP. Why can't I roleplay as a homeless person selling illegal arms such as rifles, handguns, knives, shivs and so on. That would also make sense for me to then carry one of those bigger weapons for protection. You clearly did not read the full original post. Read below please. I did not complain about the fact they could die to hits here, I simply said that it sucks that hobo's cannot adequately defend themselves from said hit men. Please check your eyes and or glasses. This supports homeless people being able to own bigger weapons. If it doesn't seem unrealistic for them to have them, whats the fucking point in such a lame ass rule? Obviously because its easy for most people to just build and enjoy the job, but some people want to be able to defend themselves properly and if you keep getting killed while trying to build you can't really do that can you? Facts, it just makes zero sense to have this rule anymore. Its just the oldheads that don't want change cause "OH NO CHANGE".

Hobo's can't even mug, raid, or kill unless its self defense. They can't base, they can't have printers or any of that schmancy shit. So tell me how this harms the server by letting hobo's have their rifles.

You don't have to care about those examples. But can you make a valid explanation as to why it would make sense for them not to have rifles at all? Is the in roleplay aspect not meant to be immersive of a life of job roleplay? I missed the part where caring had anything to do with if the suggestion was of good substance or not. Facts precede opinion. Tell me how fun it is to build as a hobo, be bothered by minges and rdm'd, and be unable to adequately defend yourself from those threats. Tell me how fun it is to not be able to conduct criminal activities yet still be constrained by nonsensical rules. I believe the constraint on criminal activities/attacking highly outweighs the effect of the rule barring hobo's from owning rifles. What harm could it do? They can't do anything with them except defend themselves. Tell me atleast one way it harms the server. Its not fun for everybody. Especially people who play as hobo to build and chill, not play tweaker roleplay.

Would you happen to be reluctant to look at the articles cause it might disprove your flawed logic? Either way it proves my point that it makes zero sense in roleplay for homeless people not to somehow have access to bigger weapons.

Description: As it stands, it makes zero sense in role-play to restrict homeless people from owning guns bigger then pistols. There are numerous real life examples of nefarious homeless people gaining access to illegal weaponry in the platform of rifles. To restrict homeless people from owning guns bigger then pistols, it assumes that homeless people cannot realistically in roleplay steal/buy or otherwise illicitly produce such weapons. If the rule isn't outright removed, it should atleast be clarified that certain overpowered weapons such as the Dragonlore, M95 or RPG (obviously cause why the fuck would they have an RPG) among other weapons that are sort of actually ridiculous for a homeless person to have. Reasoning: The fact that homeless people can be killed by hitmen, or randomly killed by a minge and only have a pistol or a knife to defend themselves is ridiculous. Even if there isn't an in roleplay scenario outside of hits being placed its still worth looking into making this change as it really doesn't do anything good for the server considering hobo's can't raid or do illegal activity. Additional Information: [Photos/Videos][/CODE]

Well, technically that assumes that homeless people cannot somehow obtain access to rifles. In fact, there are articles online about homeless people selling illegally obtained rifles and other assorted firearms to people. Just take a couple of these for example: https://okcfox.com/news/nation-world/100k-in-stolen-guns-tools-found-in-underground-homeless-encampment-san-jose-california-theft-thief-equipment-hidden-bunker-coyote-creek-wool-creek-drive-suspects-arrested-charges https://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/national-international/man-sold-two-rifles-to-boy-in-philly/145108/ Would it be uncommon for a homeless person to be brandishing a rifle versus a knife or a little handgun? Heck yea, but it doesn't mean it can't happen. Homelessness can be associated with various things, one of those things being a dumb broke criminal that recently got out of jail. People are and can become desperate in times of need. The whole "hobo's not having anything larger then a pistol or a knife" is stupid. It serves almost nothing. Hobo's can't raid, they can't commit crimes so why restrain them anymore then necessary? Its not the fact of how often it is. What mafia gang would put a hit on some random homeless person? Make sense to you? Didn't think so.

I said I would return the favor, as in I would quite simply ruin their day by getting them in trouble with staff. Whatever.