Jump to content

snowkitkat

Member
  • Posts

    18
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About snowkitkat

Recent Profile Visitors

291 profile views

snowkitkat's Achievements

Contributor

Contributor (5/14)

  • Collaborator
  • First Post
  • Reacting Well
  • One Month Later
  • Dedicated

Recent Badges

3

Reputation

  1. Stryder is a really good guy. He is dedicated and I know he will do his job well its a +1 from me
  2. -1 Use the format. Also you put no effort into this. Fix this application or it will be denied.
  3. -1 A couple things I would like to touch base on. 1. Your event ideas are not detailed enough. They need to be more detailed in order to be a quality event. 2. Your application looks like a copy and paste of your other two previous GM Applications with a few words swapped for others. You did not change your event ideas at all from your previous two either. 3. You still lack an understanding of the responsibility of being a GM. My suggestion, before you apply for the role make an attempt to get a good understanding of the position you are applying for. I would love to give you a +1 but I simply cannot for these reason. If you fix your application I will reconsider changing my vote, but for now it stays as a -1.
  4. Jockstap deserves the +1. He is active on the server and a really great guy. He also has some creative event ideas that I believe, with some adjustments, could be good off-worlds.
  5. Confirming Referral/+1 Booker is a really great person and deserves to have the chance to be on the staff team.
  6. Confirming Referral | +1 Quix is a very good person and is one of the better members of the community. He is a good leader and really good when it comes to roleplay. He is also good with enforcing server rules. I believe he 100% deserves the chance to become staff.
  7. -1 Change the color. The application is unreadable. Once it is changed I will change this to a +1. However it is a decent application. I feel as if your ideas for events could go more in-depth though.
  8. Description: Essentially, what this is suggesting is an addon where it allows players to buy weapons, such as a Westar, permanently. Now some might argue that this would take the purpose of Requisitions away, however to counter this, these permanent weapons could be more expensive than weapons from Requisitions (so something like $30,000-$50,000). Now the pros of this would be: • Gives an incentive for players to do quests and other missions for money. • Allows players to use new weapons they may have not been able to use before, which will put more use to the wide variety of weapons we have available. • This will significantly improve the economy as you could trade/sell/auction off weapons for others. However, the cons of this would be: • Some may argue this takes away the purpose of Requisitions. • Some may also say this will take away the purpose of weapons that donators get. • Some may argue that this will make different loadouts battalions have “useless”. However, there can be a solution to all of these. • These weapons would be permanent, meaning they should be more expensive. The contrast between this and Requisitions is that we sell weapons that are temporary. • For donator weapons, you unlock a weapon, such as Dual DC-17, however some classes already have this (such as 501st XO), so perhaps making it so that the weapons donators get have a slight damage buff, and something signifying they are donator weapons and that they bought them with store credits? • For the argument about battalion loadouts, some classes/battalions have special items, such as a Wrist Flamethrower, Sniper, Jetpack, or a Z-6. The weapons that make a class what it is should be kept, however the other weapons such as something like a DC-15s that every battalion has be removed from the WL to make room for permanent weapons, and perhaps only allowing 1 permanent primary, and 1 permanent secondary to be equipped at a time? So essentially this would create a system where you can customize your primary, and secondary, however keep your specialized weapons, such as a sniper a 41st may have. To keep the purpose of specialization specific weapons, perhaps refrain from selling those weapons on the permanent weapon shop? Example: not selling the sniper 41st have as their special weapon that makes them stand out from the rest, or not selling the Z-6 so the “Heavy” class can stand out from the rest and keep its purpose. Even though it may seem like it will put specialized roles into a bad place, there can be a lot of good things to come from this, such as the economy improving.
  9. +1 this man deserves this.
  10. +1 INSANELY GOOD hours, and you have creative event ideas! Best of luck on this application!
  11. Neutral Although your application is well thought out i believe you need to get more hours as as get to know the community more before you apply for staff.
  12. +1 Solid application and you are also a really great person.
  13. -1 From what I have seen you are mingey. Not only that but it looks like you put zero effort into your staff application from constant spelling errors to lack of detail in your responses.
  14. It doesn’t make sense to me how you are 14 then 4 months later you are 16. Not only that but your behavior on the server causes me to -1 your app
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Guidelines