AlexConway

Grim (as in reaper)

+1, this is a very nice suggestion, well written. I've only played DarkRP a few times, but the no-collide is a huge issue. Tt allows people to loophole and makes raiding incredibly biased to someone whom already has "Home Field Advantage". I think 80%-70% Opacity is a bet on NoCollide props. Additionally, I think that EMPs could be useful, especially because 4 fading doors opens you up to unintentional/intentional kill mazes, the EMP grenade would definitely force people to be less reliant. Good work buddha

Oh wow Anyway - credit to Shrimps and everyone who worked on it - despite getting called retarded ever 10 seconds by Shrimps; it came out really well. I am excited to see the events that come out on this server, and see how it improves the main server/community. Good work @shrimp @Bendak @Swigs @Jake @Lark @Fluffs @Romulus @Soappppp@Pencil!

-1 As the banning staff: Yes Kruger did claim an area of base, however he claimed it for "NSWG1" being as you are a SEAL and that's the SEAL prefix, he can't enforce the claim against you, as he claimed it for "NSWG1", unlike "Marine LMG Tryouts Claim ___" which is exclusive to Marine LMG Tryouts, so USMC not in the tryouts may be KOSed if stated, unlike your case. The "weapons in base must always be on safety rule" has always applied for this reasoning, so it's assumed no sims in base. Yes it's not a "written rule" for no sims in base, but it falls under the common sense aspect, and is partly under FailRP, as you would never host valid sims in your own base. Regardless of all of this still, if I had overlooked the sims in base, you all repeatedly killed each other, coming back after death(s) - ergo the continuous sims which in it's self is against the rules, and nor adverting any form of Sims Start/Stop. You additionally as I have stated before warned by your CDR (Nightmare) to stop. Most of these rules aren't written because they fall under another rule (FailRP, etc), and it's assumed those ranks who can host sims know them. TD;LR - No Sims In Base, No Sim Stop/Start Adverts, Continuous Sims, False Claim, 3+ Kills.

Just because this is shitpost doesn't mean you can Mass Hate on each other. Topic Locked. Some of you will be getting warned. EDIT: You will NOT target or harass members of this community, especially in an attempt to be little them. It will not be tolerated, regardless of "Shitpost Central" or not. There were BLATANT attacks on members of this community. "Do not harass other users of the community, or otherwise post content that would induce drama." "Use your common sense when appropriating your posts/responses." "Hostile behavior is strictly forbidden" "Members of the community must respect one another at all times, even at times with conflicting interests." Rules are found here: @Bishopil - I would like to apologize on behalf of the people involved and the forum moderation team, I'm sorry I didn't catch this thread as soon as it went up. Especially I am deeply sorry you were attacked multiple times on this thread. It has been dealt with. As for the SEALs who insinuated this thread - I am very disappointed in all of you, extremely; you got banned, so fucking what. Move past it. @Kruger did as well and he didn't comment on the thread. You all recieved warnings, when your game bans are up move past this. Next time the warnings won't be so lenient, we all know I can be more Authoritarian than I was. @Acer @Volatos @Fidelity

-1 As the banning staff: Yes Kruger claimed but for a completely INVALID reason. You repeatedly sim-ed with continuous sims, which are not allowed. Never once did anyone advert Sim Start/Sim Stop. Despite that you held sims in US Base, which is not allowed. You repeatedly did it so it's intentional, it's not you accidentally threw a grenade and damaged 3 people. You killed Kruger twice and damaged Acer, hence the AttMass and the matching 2 week ban. I had confirmed with several staff that sims in base are not allowed, still disregarding the fact no-one adverted Sim Start/Sim Spot. I do have video of me initally banning and checking logs. As a side note your own Commander (Nightmare) told you to stop in TeamSpeak.

Warned and Locked. You will not target members of this community. Thread has been locked till a DarkRP Manager looks at it.

dad jeans

+1 This absolutely needs to happen. The CZ is an absolute crutch, naturally there will be some backlash from people whom rely on it; but this definitely needs to happen. I would suggest more Aim spread, since it seems it's a bit of a laser, although the damage nerf may be enough on it's on.

Bird is DarkRP staff and doesn't count for MRP, it's not a valid referral. -1 I know you from US but you don't take time to interact with members from other factions and especially RU. Additionally your paragraphs are quite short, and feels a bit rushed; the prompt is meant on how you will better the server in terms of being staff. Additionally, prior to you getting LtGen; your activity was inconsistent.

This is the Rust section of the forums, please see the DarkRP Ban Appeal Forums if you wish to appeal. https://garnetgaming.net/forums/index.php?/darkrp/reports-appeals Be sure to follow the format. Locked [ @evity can move ]

+1 I know back in your GB COL days we never got along, AT ALL. After, fully getting to know you, you're someone with an opinion I can truly count on. I can confidently say you were always helpful in sits, and it'd be great to have someone else on the staff team with knowledge of game mechanics/coding. @Torch - Add me to refs

In-game name: Alexander Conway, Conway Age [minimum 15 y/o]: 21 SteamID (https://steamid.io/): STEAM_0:0:138807332 Warns: 1 (RDM - I shot someone right as war ended) Timezone: EST Playtime? [minimum 75 hours, use /playtime in-game]: | 11AR 2LT Alexander Conway has played for 1755:40:05. Do you have access to TeamSpeak and a microphone?: [YES/NO] YES Do you have the ability to record Garry's Mod videos?:[YES/NO] YES Referral(s): [What administrator recommended you to apply?] @Garnet@AwesomeAidan@JimTrash@Jerr Past experiences as staff: [Optional] I am a current Forums Moderator, additionally I serve as TeamSpeak staff/guardian. In the past I have staffed for Garnet Gaming MilitaryRP, once as TAdmin (2016) and another time as Admin (2017). As well as Community Manager/Media Manager for a medium sized Garry's Mod community, many Arma 3/FiveM communities, and Graphics Developer in the early days of [Redacted]Fuse Networks. How do you plan on benefiting our server? [minimum 2 paragraphs] Aside from dedication to activity in game, on teamspeak, and on the forums. As a previous staff and a long term member of the community, I find I have an advanced almost questionably good knowledge of the server's dynamics and it's rules. This can definitely pose helpful for members and current staff of this community. I would sincerely consider myself dependable and accountable, which I feel as if the staff team can benefit from. Though I do tend to joke frequently, I have no question whatsoever that I would competently and effectively be able to be mature, unbiased, and a neutral viewpoint in any situation where it is required. From being a Career Counselor to 75 US Sailors and 32 Marines, I have a great way with handling strenuous situations, when tensions are high; I always have found myself able to manage to diffuse tough situations. Understanding things from a factual basis and a neutral viewpoint has always been something I have found comes natural. Additionally I can benefit the server in more ways than simply being a "sit taker", I have always found it important for the staff to reach out to members of the community when they are going through rough times, or simply getting more involved with the community. This is something both I have actual military training and practical experience. I would kindly like everyone for reviewing my application, I would love to join the staff team once again; Garnet is definitely a place I call home and I would love to be involved on MRP once again. Have you ever been banned or punished on GG MRP? If so, Include details 1 ban in Fall 2016, it was appealed and accepted 3 hours later. Have you made any previous applications, If so when?: I have made 2 application on the old forums, once in Spring 2016 and once in Fall 2017, as well as my Forums Moderator Application; all of which have been accepted. How much time do you have to contribute to the role?: Currently I do have obligations to the Forums and Teamspeak, however to MilitaryRP I can fairly dedicate 4-5 hours a day on the weekdays, and 7-8+ on the weekends.

dad bod

prescription

This is a fix purely for the DONATOR variations of these weapons. Description: Removal of the Orsis into the SR-338, and nerf of the Mosin to be better suited for practical use on the server to fix a number of issues. Including 100 base damage per shot weapons, that you can buy and are completely unrestricted. Again, this suggestion is not aimed at removing all snipers; SOC should be able to keep them and utilize them. ORSIS: The Orsis is a powerhouse of pay-to-win, which turns any class into a sniper class; difficult to combat and counter snipe, taking draw away from factions that have snipers such as 75R and Vega, whose snipers can't compete with 80% of the server with the Orsis. The replacement is simple, with replacing the Orsis to the SR-338 similar to the SR-25 that the Orsis was originally back in 2016. The SR-338's base statistics are balanced and require no tweaking, or very minimal (such as reload speed and other minor stats). Current Orsis (LEFT) - Replacement SR-338 (RIGHT) MOSIN: The Mosin is a different issue to the Orsis, in the sense upon tweaking some damage of the Mosin, it becomes effectively balanced. The suggestion here is to change the damage of the Mosin to 65-70 range base damage. Allowing for a similar damage to the new SR-338 due to the price points. Again, difficult to combat and counter snipe 100 damage base, taking draw away from factions that have snipers such as 75R and Vega. The full list of Mosin changes are: Damage from 100 to 70, Decreased Range from 350 to 250, Change ACOG Scope to Short Dot/Aimpoint, Keeping the PU and Ironsights. Current Mosin (LEFT) - Default CW Mosin (RIght) [For Comparison] Reasoning: I. The Orsis and Mosin depreciates the value of SOC Recon Classes, their strength and accessibility has negative impacts on Sniper focused classes. II. Explain that so many Orsis/Mosin users creates a supported environment for Sniper-Heavy combat. Although it doesn’t 100% dominate, it does play a HUGE role in wars, a lot more than a single weapon should. Removing the Orsis/Nerfing the Mosin would allow for less-sniper heavy combat, and more CQC, while at the same time still keeping some CORE sniping. III. Going off of how often its used, explain class weapons no longer are apparent in wars, the L115 is never used by Rangers. The SV98 is also barely used. Top Tier SOC’s never use their HARD weapons to get. Some would argue it is harder to pass Ranger tryouts, then earn yourself the money for an Orsis. IV. Transition off of the idea that class weapons that take TIME to acquire should have more purpose and use. V. Class benefits should be utilized more than they currently are. The advantage to an SMG class should be the CQC capabilities that are specific to that class. A stacked sniper/DMR should be an added ranged capability that they CAN use, not RELY on. A medic’s advantage should be the medkit. Having a long-ranged weapon is something that can be donated for increased use with a medkit. Credit to @Soappppp @shrimpfor help on this suggestion. EDIT: Since I assumed it was obvious the donation portal listing of Orsis would just be changed to the SR-338, it's simple rename, and change of 1 line. No-one has to even fill out donation supports.

Dance

DM screenshot? -1 Still regardless of your age, you're one of the more toxic players. When I demoted you on reserves you acted childish, shit talked me - it was childish; though you owned up to it and apologized you still exhibit these behaviors. I do not think you would be a decent fit for staff. I personally am not a fan of your comments in OOC either. TD;LR: -1 Age, Immature, Petty, Childish, Toxic Tendencies.

That's so toxic, you're going to say that after he is trying to say he got into an accident. I hope you get a forums ban (off topic sorry) @Garnet

Are you doing okay? That's fucked up, other drivers are my biggest fear when driving. I hope you feel better, take your time and heal up, don't worry about us, focus on your health.

-1 Back when you played US you were very immature and kind of mingey, recently started playing RU more and I still see many of these behaviors. You're active and funny in game, but I can't give you a plus one for being active and funny. You need to change your mannerisms and behavior. As well I would tone down your comments in OOC.

+1 You've got to be fucking joking me with this shit. I know I'm not involved but I think this qualifies as relevant. "Before anyone says "You're Zach's Friend", I warned him 3 times on the forums, and he shit talks me in chatbox, not anywhere close to someone I consider a friend, but I will defend him from a powerhungry witchhunter. 1. You banned a T.Admin, you are a T.Mod - A T.Mod. You banned someone higher than your rank off of 2 screenshots? 2. This is a fucking witchhunt, trust me I've led plenty of them to know when one is a witchhunt, you conspired to get him banned. 3. He was cautioning her/him about that anyone could find her information, so she/he would change it. How the fuck is that doxxing? Doxxing is exposing information, like me leaking your real name, IP, address, phone number, snapchat. NOT telling you if someone googles your steamid they can find your information. 4. You were in a discord channel CONSPIRING against him. 5. You quote Discord with is a 3rd party application and you can't even USE it as valid evidence, it's like snapchat DMs 6. Your permission is from someone ONE rank higher who STILL isn't MANAGEMENT. So what? It's staff chat. Not OOC, even if he did say it in OOC, it's not a Dox, you banned him by him saying "Change it so you don't get Doxxed, don't know if you know that". No your behavior as a T.Mod is disappointing, you can't ban someone higher than your rank. You had no management approval. You should be removed from staff for this shit. How you got to T.Mod with this logic is concerning. STEAMIDs are public, so what? I can search them up... Wanna ban me to? You can't be serious. I searched up reflex's STEAMID to find other bans... Did I dox him? TL;DR - Ark this is a witchhunt, you conspired with other staff, banned someone of your same rank, you're not management. This is a POWERGRAB. You need to be removed and so does this ban. Your logic is flawed. How the fuck another T.Admin issued this ban is confusing.... Ark and the banning staff need to be removed, this is fucking crazy.

-1 I think you're over thinking this, it's funny; it's not meant to diss a faction and think that "edgy" is a marketing point. Also Garnet isn't originally from America so don't understand your point here. This was the issue US had for months, it was just changed give it a week, the fair and neutral choice on civilian will balance numbers out. Text screens are not having an impact on recruitment, I think it's the actual recruiters which to avoid any controversial issues on the thread you can DM me about, even though I've said them 20 times to no avail ^^^ Very very early to predict this, US dealt with this problem for months and managed, just give it a week or so. Afghan managed for years on this system, and RU on Tiaga, Tundra Forest, etc

Tasty Food

+1 - Over the course of many weeks, I have gotten to know you; you are definitely someone who has a unique approach on issues, and I can competently say you are fair in everything which is extremely needed in the staff team. Active, Mature, and a great fit for staff. Good Luck