Dan Gardner

I charged back a few months before Garnet switched to Chaharikar so I was never able to play it. It would be interesting to experience it, so that's what I'm voting for

my coc k has beig

Crouch jumping is an integral part of all Source games, and is a main component of movement across all platforms. What is being suggested here is to enforce a rule against using the crouch-while-jumping glitch to your advantage while in combat. MEANING: You can crouch jump in combat if you are using the movement to elevate yourself to a higher plane, (ie: jumping on a box or some shit). What someone could NOT do if this were enforced would be an example from either one of the clips provided. One can break their hitbox up to 4 TIMES in one jump without losing momentum. With a script, you can bind a key to break your hitbox, and it has been done on this server, and may even still be done (I haven't been on in 2 weeks)

Correction, it cut the server's playerbase in half for a month. With a protocol like that, it would take someone two warnings before they get banned. For anyone with a brain, this is plenty. Think about fast-fire, just because some people do it out of combat doesn't mean its okay for them to do it in combat, even accidentally. This is even more of a game breaking glitch as it literally makes the hitbox have a seizure, causing the person shooting at them to ultimately miss 75% of their shot attempts. This is INSANELY unfair. I don't see why people don't put this under the same light as fast-fire.

This is the reason I stopped playing MilitaryRP. So I won't give my official +/- as it would be biased. I will say that enforcing this rule will have to be based on video evidence ONLY. There is no way to prove the rule had been broken without this, so there would be no way to enforce it effectively without said evidence. I would also like this to be enforced as Exploiting, so I would say evidence would need to include the player using this glitch to their advantage at least two times in five seconds, to avoid accidental key-presses from being seen as a perm-bannable offense. Basic protocol is you can't be convicted for breaking a rule before it exists, that'd just be silly.

Description: DarkRP has VIP, which allows users who bought the perk to use jobs not allowed by default. What I am suggesting is a new VIP feature for MRP, which would allow a user to use a random gun throughout the course of a month, with the option to purchase the weapon at a 15-20% discount. Feel free to suggest additional features below, I will add the ones that make the most sense. Reasoning: It would be very simple to code, and would add extra revenue possibilities for the server.

Cut Grass

-1 Furry gets necked at 100m by a stud with an orsis and cries about it on forums, yep, MRP hasnt changed

Die alone

Run Away

That would get extremely excessive with the amount on the TS server right now, but I'm sure adding the channels won't be that hard. I'll put my piece here as I have not yet, Pros: - Discord is more popular with the overall gaming community, making it a viable choice for gamers to have an easier experience getting connected with the community - Discord is more user-friendly (easier, more simplified permissions) - DiScOrD iS FrEe Cons: - Discord does not have the ability to include a description with a channel, a mechanic almost EVERY MRP and personal channel utilizes. - Discord roles do not get icons - Discord is easier to DDoS - Public Discords can get raided by ANYONE - Locked channels would require a separate role in order to allow entry, meaning if the owner of the channel isn't there, (or someone they trust enough to give channel mod), there's no way for them to enter the channel except getting moved - Say goodbye to pokes, the only way you can get a hold of someone directly is by PMing them, and if they have permissions set, they have to have you added as a friend to accept messages That's just what I came up with on the spot, may add more later.

Have you tried cl_drawhud 0

You were cheating when I 4-1'd you in Vega Tryout sims pog

dddDWWWWWWWWWWWVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV

To be fair my ban was a lot different. Chargebacks and Cheating bans are the only two things I think you can't come back from. Then obviously advertising and Dox/DOS threats are in there too but that's pretty self explanatory and people that do that don't tend to come back anyways. That's just my piece, Homast's bans were a long time ago and insignificant (some staff members have outright gotten away with MassRDM and were allowed to stay on the team, including myself around the time his bans happened), and from what I remember he's always been a genuine and trustworthy person. +1

big talk for someone banned for cheating

Great work @Garnet! Very cool map, the new roads are a lot more satisfying.

Nice! No more waiting 10 years to craft a stack of 5.56! Also I'm moving today but as soon as I'm done I'll try to contact you.

Love the overhaul of clans, too bad my clan lead is inactive, I do like the squadW name. If you can place doors, can we assume you can place codelocks and keylocks? Also add Shop Fronts if door replacing is a thing as well.

Nice! People have asked for that a few times and I'm glad to see it added.

What's up with these bans being supported by 1 clip? MRP fr needs a Manager to regulate because this is the second time in a month someone was banned and only one clip was able to incriminate them. This clip is fishy for the sole purpose that this person was looking at the wall while creeping up, but if you look closer you can deduce this; He is using 3rd person to peek into the building, we can assume this because when he found his target, his gun moved to the left (to correct his aim onto his enemy after it was facing a wall beforehand), and he fired. Anyone walling wouldn't hesitate to just shoot the person as soon as their line of sight was clear, but the hesitation was blatant, and his aim had to be corrected, meaning he DEFINITELY is NOT tracing through walls. The next person he tried to fire at he MISSED and had to correct his aim AGAIN to find the other target, but they were to fast for him to kill. Overall, +1, at least until more evidence is posted. I don't know why staff has devalued actual evidence and goes off a single clip, which, after watching once, anyone with a few brain cells can see this is normal gameplay.