t3rr0r

god you annoy the shit out of me

use the format bruv

wait so you want him to show proof, that he didnt say something, so essentially you want all of his chat logs from the first to last?

big dab

nah u wrong -1 ez buddah best staff

love how much people care about their internet points

"im not going to give an opinion but im still gonna comment"

its quite obvious that he shouldn't be in peoples bases while on duty, especially what was happening in the second clip. and those of you saying "but you were doing stuff as well" thats not what its about, if you want to give andrew a punishment then make a seperate post with sufficient evidence. this post has well enough evidence to show that blair was breaking a, if not multiple rules, and should be punished as fit.

warnstacking another mod... are u dense

quoting incase he edits it

your last application was 2 months ago and youve only gone up 40 hours in playtime. play the server more consistently if you want to be considered -1

kerry has aspergers confirmed

youre legit a chad i want to kill you

dude goes to stamford and wants to be staff on this server lul +1

agrees with post and -1 ?

demote demote demote

-1 on an old server i was a super on, after i resigned the new super made a rule where saying kys in any way was an instant perma because he got triggered by it. if this community turns into that same snowflake bullshit i will mass rdm a kindergarten

well no sufficient proof has been provided for him to stay banned so unban the man

so here's what a normal person would do that doesn't get immediately defensive when they fucked up, screenshot the kill log, proving that they rdm'd, screenshot the advert log where both time stamps correspond, showing that (hypothetically) he didn't advert before killing the reportee. use your brain.

im sorry but from someone who was staff on mrp these kind of posts make drp staff look like complete fools. the idea that the person banning someone requires no further proof for someone to stay banned other than word of mouth is idiotic, huh isn't it just so convenient that the logs have wiped and that YOU are innocent until proven guilty, jesus the entitlement of these guys "im practically invincible until a skid learns to take a screenshot after i perm them" i don't understand this shit. if you are a staff member and ban someone, it is your responsibility as STAFF to maintain proof of the situation so in a case that they appeal, you can rebut it with the solid evidence, not make the players (who are the victims by the way) have to disprove something which is a nearly impossible task when 4 staff members gangbang them in a post.

whoa this guy definitely owns a dictionary

why post it then -.-

This gonna get denied for two reasons. One, you don't have enough playtime (minimum is 75 hours), and two, you aren't at least 15 years old. If you're under 15 you need permission from a Super Admin to apply. Fix those things and you'll at least have a chance.

make them 69

same ;-;