Considering the nature of this case, I can see how it would be hard to come to a quick decision on this. Since it is not a fairly worrisome warn and there are multiple people saying they witnessed toxicity I am at odds as to how to go about this. It was a false report even if you didn't know at the time, and basing rules are written in the rule page. Regardless of any toxicity that may or may not have been involved, since we have no video of this, I have to base my decision off of the rule broken to receive the warn, and from what I can see it was a false report. -1