Bendak

No im not reporting cause i dont like him. It's cause it was very obvious we would not be interacting with the raid since we were in a claimed area being busy with something. If anything is petty it's targeting people that are not going to interact with a raid at all.

Mhm. And the normal rule says anything inside the base is fair game. Says nothing about outside. It doesn't say that you can either

We would only be subject to raid rules if we were inside the base walls or firing back outside of base. Nowhere in the rules does it say, "If you're close enough to base walls you can kill them". And we still didn't fire back at anyone after the raid was called until you blew everyone up at OC. The fact we were in a claimed area and busy at OC should be a big enough hint that we aren't doing anything with the raid and we are not going to interact with it.

The raid rules are made for raiding F.O.B.s, not claimed areas. If that was the case then everyone would be raiding simulations and trainings left and right. Plus it was obvious you didn't even have intent to raid the base since you immediately went for targets outside of the base walls. We still were not in the base and were not firing back.

Who are you reporting? [Staff/Player]: br0ken Your in-game name: Bendak Your SteamID (https://steamid.io/): STEAM_0:0:95273474 In-game name of reportee: V br0ken SteamID of reportee (https://steamid.io/): STEAM_0:1:56201000 Date & Time of incident: Around 1:25 PM | April 13, 2019 Timezone: EST What happened? (include any proof): Me, Mark Duglas, and other Army Officers were making the enlisted to PT at OC (Making them continuously run it until we say so). OC was claimed by me at the time and was claimed for the entire situation. While we were doing our stuff at OC, br0ken calls a raid on the US. We stayed at OC so we would not get involved because we were in a claimed area and we were not going to interract with the raid. After he called it, he intentionally targeted OC and grenaded almost everyone there. You can't raid a claimed area. We were not firing back. We were not inside the base walls. And, they did not call a briefing prior to this raid. Proof of Claimed Area Proof of No Briefing Proof of Mass RDM

How about you like...move away from him?

Follow format, stupid.

Ass-Kissing pussies Well if the U.S. doesn't let someone speak their mind in a good manner on the forums then the U.S. is just retarded. If an officer is ridiculing someone for +1ing or -1ing a suggestion with valid reasoning on a forum post then that person shouldn't be an officer. But if someone is not posting because they are thinking, "But what if they don't like it?" and just that, then they need to grow thicker skin and pony up. If you're too afraid to post something on a Garry's mod forum then you shouldn't even be playing the game.

Bias would mean that the "RU Biased Staff or Players" Would be -1ing or denying just because they want it that way to have an upper hand on the US. This is not bias. It's not bias that more RU applied for staff than the US. It's not bias that the U.S. doesn't have as much forum presence because they are too lazy to get their ass on the forums and speak their mind about the topic. That's their own damn fault. If they don't want to get on and speak about it then they don't care. Maybe because you guys don't raid as much. Or maybe it's because they have people watching it. If you're also saying that there is bias here too, then hell this server is doomed. Huh...would ya look at that.

Yes...Do enlighten us on the current bias issue that we are missing out on.

Are you typing on your phone again? That doesn't make sense.

So is randomly screaming "BiAs!!!"

Oh no. Oh no. What you trynna say now? Garnet was biased when making the map? This map was made years ago and nobody threw a fit. There shouldn't be an argument about who has a better briefing hall and what is fair because it's all fair. In fact, it's not fair to the RU because if we put people on post and alert the troops that the enemy is coming, WE HAVE A BUNKER that the U.S. never uses because they're too blind and ignorant to put even one person out. If you close everyone in the bunker, there's only 2 entry points that they have to come and kill us. MP Hallway and GS tunnels, which can be easily defended if you put men in the right spot. That would require another addon to the server, which most door addons are not able to be perma-propped easily and without issue. Or that would mean Garnet would have to edit the map (which is not happening). Even if you got a garage door that could close, that won't stop you from getting blown up. In fact, that just makes it worse because you kill everyone outside, you open up the door to the people that are TRAPPED IN A WIDE OPEN AREA AND IN CLOSE PROXIMITY WITH EACHOTHER, and throw all explosives in there and around the front entrance and BOOM. Everyone is still dead. A simple door will not help. And last thing: That's because all the US Mains who are +1ing have the IQ of a rock and the RU -1ing have been playing before you even existed on the server and know better. (Oh, was that a little toxic? Boo hoo. Make a straw poll asking for my punishment.)

That poll is not going to change anything.

Acid Drop, STOOPID Idk why this was even put in this thread. The use of explosives in a raid was not the topic of discussion on this thread. It was just the topic of raiding at all.

Suicide bomb wont get removed. And a suicide bomb class will not happen. Maybe what could happen is that the old 3rd Rule of Engagement could possibly be a thing, with the thought of the fact that when anyone pulls out an explosive they definitely intend to use it. Just throwing ideas out.

-1. And here's why to all 3 solution points. Point 1: The rule before was that you couldn't fire into buildings. Buildings provide great cover for both attackers and defenders which makes things more interesting for breaching and what not. This can make things more fun instead of just throwing US into the front gate of RU and just saying, "Go kill ruskis" and the same equivalent for the RU Raiding US. Point 2: Basically you are asking for a safe space because you, or whoever is leading the briefing, or whoever the officers are on, are too lazy to assign people to be on watch for people that might advance on the base right after a war. Just assign one or two people to keep a lookout and call attention to people and get them ready for an incoming threat instead of just assuming "They're busy with their own briefing". Point 3: To explain what I'm about to say, lets give a perfect example. That feed made by Ethan was after a war that the Russians had lost. If you lost the war, would you just want to take it? Just let them take that win and not take a punch back? No. You would want revenge. You want to strike back and show you mean business. This rule proposal is to supposedly stop the interruption of briefings so that we can all communicate with each other without interruption because it's important to do because there's so much to talk about. Let's be real. (this next number is fabricated but it will prove a point) At least 90% of briefings follow at least one of these formats: 1. We won. Good war, nothing to say. 2. We lost. You all did garbage. 3. We lost but we did the best we could. "wE gOt BaSeCaMpEd!!! REEEEEEEEEEEE" Most briefings don't actually point out shit that people did wrong. There's nothing special that happens in these briefings. It always follows the same DB Template that has been used for years. So what did we learn? How about we put people on posts after war and be vigilant and watchful of our enemy, instead of just be complete sitting ducks in a building with only one entrance (which happens to be a very big door that is easy for explosives to travel through)

Mass RDM is a type of RDM so it would fall under that category. -1 If you want to kill then go do sims or some shit. RDM is RDM

And the skill tree of about half the players on the server bout to fall off the deep end. Epic Gamer Moment. SUA SPONTE!

I'm with ya on this one. I've put so many dumb and 300IQ reacts on this post alone that I can't react anymore xD

There's no way you could see me on the edges of the hills when you flicked to me dude. I was waaaaay out of that range. Not even on your screen. Nice try.

+1 Plenty of clips where there is insensible tracking through hills and a 180 snap clip when he isn't even notified legitimately in game by any source.

Hey I'm just trynna have a laugh here. I can't talk for the rest of rangers on the laugh shit tho. They need to grow up. I agree with you on all that.

I think it's time to lock this post. This SHITPOST got way too much traction than it should have.