Volatos

+1 Has the previous experience, community rep, and dedication to the server, the army faction, and the staff roster. Great choice for T.Mod. Give me back my superadmin

Well according to the screenshotts of the docs, SOCM is equivalent to the Navy rank of Master Chief Petty Officer, E9. There is still a rank above this in enlisted which would Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy, which would be the equivalent to SMA or SMMC. SOCM, or in common rank terms MCPO, would be equivalent to Sergeant Major. I'm staying neutral in this whole debacle, but would like to point out this as it seems necessary to the main point.

So...

Good look for what? 2GA PVTs?

RU BASECAMPER : TEAM 3 reporting for duty

+1 Love the idea; however, would the attachments from 7 and up work? Cause currently guns like the LR have an attachment on 7 and you can't equip it, unless there's a way to fic this with console the extra slots are useless.

Just a question to clarify, does the rebirth totem work like the MRP rebirth token to prestige the player?

If Jamsin replies somethings wrong

RU does have one, but they've had it, integrating the officers into one faction would be a mess. The generals would become flooded. Seems to make more problems than solve them.

How would this work with Officers in 1MD? Would they transfer over to 11B? 11B has a pretty full Officer roster, this would create a flooded faction it would seem. If 1MD gets removed then would you want to add in say a Navy tryout faction, then have SEALs above them, just like 1MD and MARSOC is now without the tryout for 1MD?

He got banned for enforcing his claim on a specific point? There isn't a written rule stating that you must wait a specified amount of time in order to KOS on your claim. This is completely unfair to ban for NITRP, which isn't a relevant ban if it was supposedly massing on a claimed area. To keep this ban would create the precedent that staff can enforce rules that aren't written in the server rules. This would created such a shift in admin powers, to allow them to decide on sits to their own rules and their imagination would facilitate such an unfair dynamic of power within the staff team. To top that off, to my knowledge he had only killed two people, so the maximum punishment he would get should be RDM x2 and a 10 minute sit. I would like to understand why the ban was put in as NITRP for killing two people on his own claim when it isn't a specified rule. Either get Garnet to edit the rules, or don't allow staff to decide on sits with rules they create from their mind that don't follow the server rules. This ban cannot stay in place because he was banned for a rule that doesn't exist.

+1 Extremely active, and is always helpful to those in his factions and those that aren't. Mained both sides at some point, and is liked on both as well. Great reputation, great activity, great candidate.

Congrats to Witchings on winning, thank everyone for joining in and letting me do this! Here's to another great year on Garnet!

Glad to see the feedback and the amount of replies, love the moments brought up as well. There's only a few days left, I will be choosing a winner on the 7th of January, and notifying them when it happens. Good luck to everyone! I will be gone this weekend so I will not be able to tell anyone in game so if anyone wants to let others know, maybe the newer players specifically that would be much appreciated. Another note, if you already have guardian or defender and don't want the other we can discuss something if the time comes, I'm down to be flexible to let the winner have a nice somewhat late Christmas gift. Also check out my DarkRP giveaway if you play DRP, it's kinda dead so your chances of winning are quite high.

This update is amazing! Can't wait to see this all in action! Thanks for a great year, and here's to 2020 and what it has to hold for MRP!