Leaderboard

DENIED I'm going to deny this report on doodle and here's why: 1. He wasn't in the wrong for banning you, you claimed he did it without context and you told us here that "the mayor let you." 2. You also claimed you only killed two people (which is true) but it shows you as the instigator on 4 people. That's reasonable grounds for attempted mass rdm which is the same punishment 3. I don't believe he was "fishing for bans" he looked at the logs between you and the person you reported and found sufficient evidence to ban you. 4. (And finally) you're only reporting him and not appealing the ban so you know you're in the wrong and didn't want to challenge it I understand why you're irritated because you got banned after reporting someone else, but that's not a reason to report the staff member after he found sufficient evidence against you Thank you for your report, as well as the effort you have put into your report.

ACCEPTED After deliberation with the DarkRP Administration Team, we have decided to accept your Staff Application. This is largely in-part to some, but not limited to, the below reasons: You enjoy a great reputation in our community and have made many friends along the way. We definitely believe your time and effort on the server will amount to good things and we're happy to have you aboard the team! Welcome to the DarkRP Staff Team! We're looking forward to getting you trained and having you on board! Please do not use any commands/permissions until you have been trained, contact a member of the HR Team for training!

@HX8888 Respectfully if you put in a report; even if it's for RDM x1 and the logs show that he's been Mass RDMing he's going to get banned. Vice Versa in this instance, when it comes to anything that's Mass it's taken very seriously and is a 0 tolerance policy. You provided context by saying "mayor had given me permission too", you blatantly admitted to Mass RDMing. I'm not power hungry nor trying to make Garnet Gaming a toxic server, I'm simply following what I was trained to do. What would make the server worse is allowing players to Mass RDM and getting away with it, I'm not trying to seem like a bad staff member according to you but simply following the rules.

-1 Nobody should be safe from random auto-hits. Removing the possibility for Hobos to be targeted randomly can remove a large % of the server. Hobos are one of the easier targets, as well. God forbid you get someone who's been sitting in their Industrial base farming printers for the past 4 hours. Keep Hobos as a target.

nah, sorry to disappoint brother. Hobos should not have a larger weapons. There hobos

So, according to what you said the Mayor allowed you to KOS people which is not allowed at all. If you read the Mayor Job rules in the Server Rules forum you can see that it says You may allow certain players permission to enter PD and spend time with you past the 2nd door, but they may not enforce your KOS rules. The mayor CANNOT enforce KOS rules to other players no matter what circumstance, also the Mayor cannot put a law for "KOS Is Legal" No minge laws. (this includes KOS laws, J-Walking laws, and any law that would restrict a player's movement) You did kill more than two people according to logs, therefore it is identified as "Mass RDM" and is bannable for 2 Weeks. The person you reported did get banned for RDM + LTAP but that doesn't mean you can go around and KOS people because the Mayor told you to. Provided in the screenshot with "TCG Pepe but call me Peep" you can also see that he Mass RDM'd as well. I STRONGLY recommend you refresh yourself with the server and job rules, I'm sorry you feel this way about me and I hope you have a good rest of your day!

Really genuine and kind dude, not an ounce of toxicity in this guy. Great to base with and super chill to have conversations with. I can definitely see him doing great in a staff position.

Just so I can understand you properly. Are you appealing the ban, reporting doodle, or both? Here are the screenshots from doodle, he will be providing context for us. In the meantime I will not accept nor deny whatever you're trying to do with this post until you confirm what its for.

PENDING INTERVIEW Thank you for your application. After deliberation with the Human Resources Team, we have decided to tentatively accept your application and advance you on to the interview stage. Please ensure you have joined the Garnet Gaming DarkRP Discord Server. A link to the discord can be found at the top of the page on the Navigation Bar, or here. Once in the Discord, please message anyone with the "HR Division" role, or any member of the Administration Team, with a few dates and times to coordinate your interview. Thank you again for the time and effort you put into your application. We look forward to speaking with you soon! Community responses may still be posted during this time, thank you!

admaxis

-1 I don't really see a problem with auto-hits on hobos. In RP terms, perhaps the mob boss wants to rid the streets of homeless who are turning customers away from his restaurant, if the restaurant ain't busy, how's the boss supposed to launder all his money through it? The feds will smell something fishy with a highly profitable business that never has any customers, and that ain't the sort of attention the boss needs. I think overall, removing the hobo only serves to set a precedent for other classes. I mean what did the citizen do to deserve a hit? Or the chef? I think the same argument could be used in many cases, and it would ultimately mean that very few classes are 'deserving' of a hit. These auto-hits help keep the hitman engaged, so when a player comes to actually place a hit, there's someone around to take it on.

Description: As it stands, it makes zero sense in role-play to restrict homeless people from owning guns bigger then pistols. There are numerous real life examples of nefarious homeless people gaining access to illegal weaponry in the platform of rifles. To restrict homeless people from owning guns bigger then pistols, it assumes that homeless people cannot realistically in roleplay steal/buy or otherwise illicitly produce such weapons. If the rule isn't outright removed, it should atleast be clarified that certain overpowered weapons such as the Dragonlore, M95 or RPG (obviously cause why the fuck would they have an RPG) among other weapons that are sort of actually ridiculous for a homeless person to have. Reasoning: The fact that homeless people can be killed by hitmen, or randomly killed by a minge and only have a pistol or a knife to defend themselves is ridiculous. Even if there isn't an in roleplay scenario outside of hits being placed its still worth looking into making this change as it really doesn't do anything good for the server considering hobo's can't raid or do illegal activity. Additional Information: [Photos/Videos][/CODE]

Hobo's can't even mug, raid, or kill unless its self defense. They can't base, they can't have printers or any of that schmancy shit. So tell me how this harms the server by letting hobo's have their rifles.

-1 I don't really care about "real life examples" of the homeless owning rifles, but when it comes to the server the little discrepancies between jobs are what make them fun. Hobos have to be one of the oldest jobs on the server, and its always been fun to give yourself a challenge at defending yourself with knives and small arms, not like you have valuables to defend anyway so who cares if you die, you're a hobo. Jobs have their ups and downs, hobos are immune to multiple direct roleplay scenarios, build in the street, dumpster dive, and yell at people. They should be scrappy little goblins who jump your ass with shivs, bricks, or their fists.

Everyone -1'ing this should also then agree hobos should have larger weapons. If we can be attacked just like any other class let me hold a damn rifle.

It’s not supposed to destroy things or even deal damage trough world props, what you are referencing is simply a bug. RPG has always had the same blast radius and there’s no reason to change it now after so many years because some people can’t handle its utility to perform in raids. You’re basically asking to nerf kill the only weapons worth getting from !cases. I won’t stand with that

I have to strongly disagree. It's supposed to have AOE, sure, but the range on it can be wild. I tested an RPG from the sewers recently, and it can easily kill players and destroy printers on the surface. Same is true if you're basing next door to someone else getting raided (for example, the garage next to the PD) https://streamable.com/a926ai Altough I do agree with nerfing bases so that they're actually raidable if someone made that as a suggestion

this is gmod, not real life, i aint lookin at those articles

-1 yeah no, im not interested in this

You don't have to care about those examples. But can you make a valid explanation as to why it would make sense for them not to have rifles at all? Is the in roleplay aspect not meant to be immersive of a life of job roleplay? I missed the part where caring had anything to do with if the suggestion was of good substance or not. Facts precede opinion. Tell me how fun it is to build as a hobo, be bothered by minges and rdm'd, and be unable to adequately defend yourself from those threats. Tell me how fun it is to not be able to conduct criminal activities yet still be constrained by nonsensical rules. I believe the constraint on criminal activities/attacking highly outweighs the effect of the rule barring hobo's from owning rifles. What harm could it do? They can't do anything with them except defend themselves. Tell me atleast one way it harms the server. Its not fun for everybody. Especially people who play as hobo to build and chill, not play tweaker roleplay.