Weeb_

Denied After review of the evidence and situation, it is quite obvious that you were cheating. @Ozzy @Jake Please lock and move to denied. (If the post looks odd, I am on mobile and I will edit when I am able to)

Then withhold the +1. This is an MRP app. Not trying to be toxic but if you dont want people to take the +1 seriously cause you dont play MRP, then don't post it

-1 | MRP Needs time, work, and dedication. You may be a fantastic DRP staff but MRP is a whole nother' community and system. You are active on MRP but not enough. You barely have 90 hours on MRP and with this server, its all or nothing. Nothing against you, just looking out for MRP.

-1 | You are a great guy and all but like others have said. You lack maturity. Sometimes you dont know when to stop and it can be funny at times but becomes a problem at times as well. Sure joke around as normal but dont let it be a constant.

We really appreciate your work and effort to make MRP better as we also try to increase pop. Fantastic stuff!

Denied You have had plenty of time to change your appeal to the correct format. We cannot accept an appeal that is unfinished and lacks the proper information. @Ozzy @Homast Please move to denied and lock.

+1 | Always ready to do whats right and most helpful.

congrats @Zachman

@bangbro This is the MRP section. Please be sure write appeals in the correct section. https://garnetgaming.net/forums/index.php?/forum/18-reports-and-appeals/ This link goes to the Reports & Appeals tab for DarkRP Also please be sure to follow the format provided. @Zachman Please move to DRP reports/appeals and notify DRP staff on this.

Denied @Hepp I have updated the status of your appeal. Staff have provided evidence of not one but multiple other warns for basecamp. Do not do this again. Lying will always prove useless. @Ozzy @Zachman Please move this topic to denied

+1 | Genuinely wants to help the server and enjoys it. Just look at SWRP

Didnt know. Thanks for putting in the time,

+1 | Great guy and genuinely wants to make the server better.

-1 | Snipers are big ole beefy boys. They should not be used for cqc and medium range combat.

+1 | Since i have been working closer with him in MARSOC, I see great potential staff wise in this guy, he tries his best in MARSOC and I know he will do the same on the staff team.

SHOOOO THOSE LOOK CLEAN. +1 | I don’t see how it would hurt at all

first off. you aint getting your money back G. People spend hundreds of dollars on this server and then veteran mass. you loses 30 bucks. oh well. dont try to charge back either. thats a good way to get community banned . also you shoulda been banned for 999 years not 2 so idk what happened there. *shrug*

+1 | From what ive seen from you I think you would do good with staff but I also agree with some other people saying to tidy up your act a bit before getting in.

+1 | The whole update was awesome exept for the HUD. The HUD looks nice but there are some shortcomings and limitations.

Denied Perm ban appeals must be sent in within 30 days of the ban so staff members do not need to hold onto evidence forever. @Ozzy or @Zachman Please move to denied. Thank You.

+1 | Good man. You are on a decent bit & do good for your team.

Host's Name: Weeb Host's SteamID: STEAM_0:0:432311404 Event Title: Narrative: There were 2 teams. Both had to fight over control over the payload. The more people on the payload; the faster it went. First team to get the payload to their side wins. Team kermat ended up winning 3/5 matches. All players enjoyed event and said they would play again. All went well! Location: Omega Factions Involved: All Objective: Power Plant Assisting User(s): Naas Assisting User(s) SteamID(s): Couldn't get it Screenshots: @Ozzy Can you please move this topic into the post event report section? I can't seem to make a post in there.

Denied You must apply for a perm ban appeal only within 30 days after the ban. @Zachman Please lock this and put in denied.

+1 | I agree with everything. I think this adds more RP opportunities and more fun aspects to something instead of just hitting a bind