Smity_
-
Posts
439 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by Smity_
-
-
19 hours ago, Ozzy said:
Smity > Manager: Hurry uuuuup
hey now
-
Ban Appeal
in Denied
Make sure you follow this format so the TTT Team can help you how better!
-
I believe this is possible. But this would require new quests to be made each time so they aren't repetitive unless it involves the random events system but at that point that involves garnet to add that.
-
Ban appeal
in Denied
@Sholsyplease follow the format to be helped by the DarkRP Team!
-
1
-
-
Accepted
This isn't considered harassment as it was an isolated moment, but it is still diss in OOC which is a warn and the correct punishment in this case. He will be receiving a warn for diss in OOC and a staff strike. Thank you for bringing this to my attention and hopefully not have this happen again.
@Smity_please lock and move thanks oh wait.....-
4
-
1
-
-
These are your recent bans. It has only been two months since the Vet Mass Ban a Staff Member from our operator team will give a response soon.-
1
-
-
Your suggestion has been Accepted,
Please note that accepted suggestions will not necessarily be implemented into the server, but rather forked over to the development team for a second opinion, at which point they are free to choose between implementation or not.
-
1
-
-
Alright. I have already had an idea like this in the past. But, this is something ran within army not an additional faction would help with feel free using this doc - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IyFh3yYBnsSv-H0cwviiGCxr5I-ClixAFrj-Q9W4R7k/edit?usp=sharing copy it and update it if you need to use it. So this is denied.
-
Denied
Due to recent events within army, I don't think good decisions will be made with the permissions you are given with Gamemaster. If you plan on staying within the community definitely apply in the future with different events as we do want more gamemasters in the future. But as I mentioned please work out your current issues before re-applying.-
1
-
-
Absolute W
-
57 minutes ago, Luna_Stargazers said:
UT AT has been told to cause lag with several vechiles on
This can be an issue resolved by staff, if there are too many vehicles spawned in it can definitely lag the server.
-
4 hours ago, Vortex1 said:
I feel like the forum is the best way to do that, I’m sure you don’t expect me to go person to person on the server as that would take too much time. Perhaps I posted in the wrong thread and should’ve asked for opinions there instead, oh well.
I mean yeah sometimes you can post suggestions that can have additional things that come from it, but normally you want as much information given to garnet as possible for 1. It makes garnets life easier 2. It just makes more sense for others to give a +1 or -1 for those suggestions. If there isn't something they know is going to come from it they will just see that it's a waste of time. Otherwise this can be a great suggestion with more steps taken. Definitely worth to come back to the suggestion in the future with more steps taken as I mentioned in my last comment.
-
1
-
-
The clip showed that you had some type of additional help with killing the player and I do think some people deserve to be unbanned if they cheated but for those that have been unbanned provided something to the server than just being another person on the server.
With the 30-Day Rule that you can't appeal after that is also applied here.
This appeal is denied.-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Vortex1 said:
I’m asking the people playing the server what they’d like to see as well since they’re also going to be paying for it. My taste might not match everyones. The community did not come up with the already existing ones, you did. People have enjoyed them so far so I think your opinion is important too because you know what fits and what doesn’t better than anyone. Let’s be real the money is there. Could make a forum poll and see what the players want and go from there.
That’s just how I see it
I completely understand where you are coming from, but at the same time coming from a developer standpoint, the skins currently seem to be working/doing fine. Yes, I bet it would be wonderful to see those new faces. But what garnet was pushing for was for you to go around and ask people what new skins that they would like and be reasonable on what skins to put in. It's like me saying that "something should be added" But what exactly? So for him to add something, he needs the so called skins that y'all want to add. It's not often that he should go out of his way to add skins that y'all didn't ask for as they can flop if y'all don't like it. If you gave him skins he could easily add them as options and at that point there is a possibility that he could add some extras as he gets an idea of what the people were looking for but its not guaranteed that he does give you the extra skins that you didn't ask for, as the reason I mentioned earlier. Just makes his life easier and less of a headache when going to add something in.
-
2
-
-
On 9/20/2022 at 11:38 PM, Pigeon said:
Hello Everyone,
I would like to make a suggestion towards the power cells that are located in each base. The suggestion is "To make the power cells unmoveable during times when the server has a low player count".
In more detail, what I'm trying to say is that when ever the server reaches a low player count 1 of 2 things can happen.
1: Upon reaching low server pop. both US and AFG base will have power cell respawned into the generator (giving power to the base) and then frozen until the server regains a higher player count.
2: If a base already has a power cell in the generator that cell gets frozen until high player pop, at the same time another power cell is spawned somewhere close to the base that is missing it (the little
outposts just outside of each base) and a player from that base has to go grab it an put it in. Upon that power cell being placed in the generator it too will be frozen until high server pop.
2.5: If both bases are missing a power cell then 2 power cells will be spawned and from there it would act like the #2 suggestion.
My reasoning behind all of this is that whenever the server reaches a low pop. and the lights are all out rather than it being RP, it just becomes an actual nuisance and it becomes impossible to find a
power cell to bring the lights back on. Additionally, whenever there is low pop. it becomes impossible to defend the power cell when you are doing stuff like training, tryouts, sims, RP, and everything
else that takes you away from the base. All it takes is one pesky intruder (who does not even need to initiate a raid) to walk in and out with the power cell to turn the lights off.
What I would consider as low pop is something like 20-30 players.
This idea makes sense to a certain extent, but think of it this way. If you just give them the power core there can be nothing for them to do. So not having the power core can having people wanting to get it which causes people to be active and brings up the total pop cause the AFG and US are fighting over it with the use of the ROE during these low pop times.
Just mainly the reason to do something when nothing is happening which results in this suggestion to be Denied.
-
1 minute ago, ChrisRid said:
Just to give my 2 cents, I might not be a player of SWRP but just going from my own experiences with DRP and CRP.
I think we have a really good setup regarding the staff teams. I know it might be a little frustrating when there aren’t too many staff online, or perhaps with the GM work you mentioned, but the vast majority of staff volunteer their time passionately to help keep the servers population happy, and I think they do a good job of that.
Now and then I’m sure there might be the odd member who you may have concerns with, but the managers (and Proggy and Garnet) have always been happy to help out and receptive to genuine issues, in fact it’s quite incredible how much time they all put into the servers really given they have lives to live too.
You mentioned about the feedback forms for people to fill-in, and believe it or not I always fill one in monthly leading up to the promotions, even if I only have good things to say, and I do feel that the managers listen and take everyone’s thoughts on board.
My biggest reason for sticking around on Garnet when I first found the server was the fact I felt it was run so well, with staff who cared and wanted to help people, who were unbiased with fair and transparent staff rosters and an appeal process. You can rest assured that spending 1000’s of hours in game won’t be lost to a rogue admin, because the structure is good.
Again, this is my experience and views from DarkRP / CityRP
Even with no experience with SWRP this was said very very well in this sense and I can say thats true for myself after working with garnet for almost a year now Thank you @ChrisRid for this input. But anyways, if you don't feel comfortable talking to Remake or mark about pressing matters or issues, feel free to reach out to proggy or even myself as I like to involve myself with those issues, there is a lot of people within this community that want to see garnet thrive even more than it already has.
-
1
-
-
5 hours ago, Luna_Stargazers said:
I'm not the one with that opinion Smity. I think garnet cares about all servers. That is just something I heard when talking about the server in TS one night and they went into detail. That is where I got that quote. You can say don't ever say that about garnet. But I'm not the one who needs convincing
This is exactly how drama starts, he said or she said. That's not exactly how you fix anything. When you talk to mark or remake they can discuss it and make the server better but saying “well, smity said SWRP sucks” does not help at all. Figure out the issue and try to help the executives with that. Otherwise, it will be that diagram all over again. Do your part and help the server.
-
1 hour ago, Luna_Stargazers said:5 hours ago, Nutter said:
myself and @Proggy have always received reports, I don't think this is an issue. The title of HR makes little sense in this application.
Then the title of HR really doesn't make sense then.
The point of HR is to deal with staff/player related issues. If you have no HR within the staff team, that would leave it up just to executives to make the decision. I do understand that there might be differences from MRP and SWRP staff divisions, but it’s not all sunshine and lollipops. Instead of directly going at the throat of a server that wasn’t doing that wonderful, get as many people as possible to show up to those leadership meetings or get in-touch with remake or mark as he is always in TS. Suggest those Ideas and use the crap ton of resources you already have the server. If you don’t feel comfortable saying it in person, feel free to post in the suggestions tab as you have already. But don’t ever say garnet doesn’t care about a server that he updates the most.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Nutter said:
Jetpack Toggling
NEW COMMAND
NEW COMMAND
This command may be utilized by GM+ & Admin+ in order to disable jetpacks.
This can be used during off-world events, or specific maps such as Venator, where a jetpack would make little to no sense.
Simply run the command to toggle the status of jetpacks
I have adjusted a 5 second grace period before power is cut out from jetpacks, allowing players to land safely
This is huge!
-
Even though I told Blink or (Deathwish) not to put me as a referral, I did indeed tell him to apply and I would put my comment there. (note: this is not a drawback to his application as I did always ask him to apply.)
+1 He is a consistent member at this point and just got 2LT in Rangers due to the activity and the amount of activities hosted. He's definitely someone that would benefit the staff team as I mentioned what he has done to benefit the server.-
1
-
1
-
-
5 minutes ago, Zombiekilla said:
What’s dose back orbs do
XP.
-
DeniedLack of community support and the app was lackluster. Please put more effort into your next one.
Feel free to apply again in 2 Weeks after you think you have the support to do so.
-
Your suggestion has been Accepted,
Please note that accepted suggestions will not necessarily be implemented into the server, but rather forked over to the development team for a second opinion, at which point they are free to choose between implementation or not.
-
1
-
-
22 hours ago, Shin_Tsukimi said:
Currently Baked > 1397 Sits (Senior Moderator) Double Promo!!!
what the actual fuck. This man never slept. Good shit man.
MilitaryRP Update [12/03/2022]
in Server Updates
Posted
flipin FATupdate