FlameSoul

It's been a while since this was suggested and having spent time looking into how the update has been since, I feel that a New Life Rule restriction is not necessary as I haven't seen any issues or complaints against it. -1

I believe this suggestion was accepted and implemented. I see it's an older post now, it's just in the general suggestion section.

Not a bad idea I suppose. I could see people liking the suggestion a lot. +1

Having had the new Mayor update for a bit now, I can see the benefit of an election cycle. While there is a rule which restricts the Police Department to only 2 fading doors, this is still plenty for most departments as they are well defended through the Civil Protection, and in some cases a Mayor will camp in the Police Department for the entire day defending it, not allowing for another player to try the position. Granted this isn't something I've noticed happen often so I don't believe it's by any means a priority, although having an election cycle for a Mayor that holds the position for 3 hours or so could serve well as a protentional update in the future. That being said as mentioned by Glorbnob, alts could abuse the election system and so there'd likely need to be a restricting factor to prevent alts from weighing in on the election. +1

As mentioned by ChrisRid, I don't believe that a food requirement is necessary, but rather adding temporarily perks to each food product consumed would be much better in terms of the players experiences. -1

Lowering the price will in turn increase the amount of purchases and that in turn will help get rid of some money from the game economy and allow for more players to experience the perk so it seems like a reasonable suggestion. +1

I'm not sure of how much work would be required to add this and so I don't believe it's a priority, although if it isn't much I do feel that it could help exponentially in setting up events. +1

While the idea for sure is creative and I love to see that in suggestions, I unfortunately do feel that this severely takes away from the main function of a general DarkRP server and I don't believe it would do well on here. Nonetheless, I love the effort put into the suggestion! -1

Good playtime, well written application, and seems like a genuine player. +1

Plenty of playtime, the application follows proper guideline, and seems like a genuine player. +1

Well written application, have had plenty of good experiences with the applicant, and I'm confident that the applicant will do well as a staff member. +1

It's been a pleasure staffing alongside you. After two long years of staffing you deserve this time to relax and just game! Here's to wishing you a prosperous life through college and work. Cheers!

Yet another great month on DarkRP! Congratulations to the many promotions received and cheers to another good month!

Good luck on your exams, study well!

Hello SGT-Clumsy, thank you for following up on the ban. Understand that it can be quite confusing to see a ban when you're just coming on to have some fun. I took the report, checked over the logs, and while I do see a proper raid advert, you were not a job that's permitted to raid bases. Below are the logs. Excuse the following picture quality, my computer wasn't saving it and so I took it with my phone.

Wishing you good health! No rush to get back my friend, take time to rest.

Unfortunately due to your playtime being less than the required 72 hours, this application won't be accepted. Don't be discouraged by this though, the team is always looking to expand and you could be a great fit when you meet the staff application requirements! Just apply again when that time is!

I've always seen you as a mature, kind, and helpful person. Hoping to see this get accepted! +1

Never fun to burn out but it for sure happens. Wishing you the best on your week break, hopefully will see you hyped up when you're back!

To start off, you were raiding with your buddy who was also banned for No Intent To Roleplay, were you not curious what happened to him when you "got back"? Prior to starting off this report, I'll include that you and your group have been involved in numerous complications with other players and were let off on most counts generously. In addition a No Intent to Roleplay ban is generally used for those that break three rules within a immediate timeframe although in certain cases is accepted when there's blatant evidence that a player is not intending to roleplay. I'm generally well accepting of people messing around but what you have done went way too far into ruining the base owner's night and that is not acceptable. Now, the pictures below are a very small few of the ones from that sit which display you were present and active throughout the sit, that was placed by your raiding partner.

Love the suggestion, would be fun to see it played out. +1

Cheers to a good month, congratulations to everyone on this strong month we've had! Here's to many more good months to come!

Denied Based on your initial report, you stated that you logged off as you were being raided and looking at the video provided by the staff in charge of the ban it shows that you threw a nerve gas to defend your own base before disconnecting. @Shin_Tsukimi@stretchy please lock and move.

There are quite a few buildings to choose from when building a base so adding this to the rules likely wouldn't be a priority of the server, granted there isn't much work to doing such, and so I'd say no reason to not have this as an exception. Over the past year I've seen a few individuals build here, most of which being new players looking for a place to hide their printers and a few taking this place as a challenge to build on. +1

If this is possible to implement it for sure would be helpful in keeping FailRP to a minimum. +1