Pencil

I think if anything any solution that causes a whole "nono I was inside the line" argument is a bad idea, Coyote and really anyone who was here for the CSD 'valentines' event can attest to this, US would literally just sit on walls to bait basecamp warns and it would cause like 30 minute sits of uploading videos and discussing what was in base and what wasn't. Also making a bigger zone causes this type of problem; The reason why Charharikar was good for anti-basecamp was as other people stated, how quickly you can move forces to the outer hills to kill the campers cause of how close the hills were and how close the gates were, allowing people to quickly group up on one hill and disperse to their objectives. Delta as is already causes you to un-render the other exit that is being basecamped when you leave, meaning if you're trying to split forces to KH and Silo, you are already having to waste a lot of time and cover/check a larger area to make sure all basecampers are dead. Honestly I kinda support this, Ethan had this rule in place for SSO even before I had been in it and it was honestly some of the most fun I've had in wars. It allowed for us to look at new places around the map to gain advantages and we had whole documents dedicated towards how to play on objective and the most crucial areas to hold. Now-a-days all SOC just look like a bunch of cod players running around like it's TDM Nuketown on an OBJ until it's clear then moving off to basecamp. I think a failrp warn is a bit excessive, even just making it more enticed for SOC to stay on OBJ or adding more flavorful outposts around objectives could make them more wanting to not run up to the enemy base and wait for people. Or even add mortars or a form of aerial combat to punish people who push too far or people who are out in the open on OBJ's (obviously to prevent aerial basecamp just make a rule that flying to close to the enemy base would be failrp cause of Anti-Air or some shit, or actually add anti-air)

+1 Known Oat about two years now and he's probably one of the best fit at the moment to take RC off it's feet. He has had his slip-ups in the past and has definitely made mistakes but, seeing how he has been able to handle 91st and make it one of the most active and trust worthy battalions for events while having no experience with leading something close to an entry faction, I'd say he's done good for it. Regarding how he'd fit into the Boss position, I think he'd be perfectly fine. He's always been one to be able to co-ordinate small groups of people and be able to RP reasonably well. I think Boss will also be a good position for him, as RC is not needed for every single operation and he would be able to find other roles to fit on his other characters should his members be missing for an event, or should RC simply not be needed by the GM's. Good luck, Oat.

Description: This suggestion covers two addons that help to keep immersion. The addons simply remove the world model of the physgun to hide it from view, mute the toolgun sound and the toolgun 'laser'. The viewmodel of the toolgun and physgun still stay, relatively changing nothing for the client and only adding to the immersion of the third-party (event participants). Reasoning: These addons will allow for more immersion in the server, which is fitting seeing as SWRP is inherently RP and event driven. This will also remove the 'metagame' of people hearing a toolgun and instantly going "ooo time to look for droids" and following the noise of the toolgun. It will also help when we have big waves of enemies being spawned and it's not just a huge mass of toolgun noises and blaster noises combined. Additional Information: Addon 1: Muted Toolgun Addon 2: Hide Physgun

"Messages shorter than 20 characters may or may not be considered 'Spam' " Idk dog, a reply to my own post to a friend with an inside joke is kinda spammy.

squirrel swirel

I have been, mostly rainbow and mw and it's quite fun. For the most part though I'm tryna focus on schoolwork since I have 4 maths. I understand your anger and completely where you're coming from, especially since you had to play against it. I apologize for that. Appreciate you responding, thought you'd just cringe react and think nothing of it, but I respect it. Good luck on the server man. If you ever decide to be friends again, I'd be more than happy to play league or mw sometime again. Also checked the date I actually got the cheat, not started being a member, so it was 3 months. Still scummy though, I wont deny that. @Jackal

can't give out more reacts so >.< i'll miss you too little man. what you wrote acc gave some feels so

yikess that ended like 2 months ago

@Bear Lockness Thanks for FMG. Sad we didn't make it into SSO together back on Siberia. You were the main reason I wanted to stick around cause it actually felt like I was making an impact when someone recognized me and said I was a good medic main and deserved a gun. @Jackal Thanks for the V handpick almost a year ago. Honestly looking back at it, I wish I stayed and continued to be good friends with you instead of ruining it. @Ghost siege sometime ok? @Milton Thanks for the ban. Was fun to argue with you when you were in GRU. @WeirdChamp I miss you man. @skrt i f r o z e @Tora1 I miss you and the old sso boys. except catfisher. Might add some more tags, might not. Those are the main people that stick out to me at the moment and that have had the most memorable experiences with. I'm making this more out of just saying yeah, I did hack. How long? Since November 25th 2019. That's about it, not much more to say. I'll be in TS from time to time to talk to friends. See you next ban wipe

can't wait to play!

In-game name: 11B PV2 Emanuel (at-time of ban; also went by MARSOC 2ndLtR J Emanuel) [Pencil] SteamID (https://steamid.io/): STEAM_0:1:32512533 Staff members in-game name: Kendal/Milton Staff members SteamID (/id (name): STEAM_0:0:50072294 Date & Time of incident: 2020-01-25 - 23:55:00 Timezone: EST Ban Reason: Cheating How long were you banned for?: Permanently Proof of Ban: What happened? (include any proof): I had been playing after work with a new weapon loadout I wanted to try, AEK with minimal recoil and an ACOG, and serbu as my main secondary. Personally I know that this type of loadout had been retarded for a long time, and only recently wanted to try it again since I saw a few people doing well with the AEK, and I wanted to try and start a new 'trend' again. I had been restricting myself to single-fire, and had really good results, even against players with an orsis, since due to the kick from being hit by the AEK, they can't really hit you as long as you get a shot off first. I played around with this for maybe two wars, until I was met with a ban whilst I was in the middle of fighting 2 RPG's, dying and calling out the targets I died to, to Fupert. Why should your ban be removed?: I'll start this off by saying, I by no means have been oblivious to the attention I have been gathering, and it was rather ballsy of me to use a cheeky loadout. I believe my ban should be removed because ultimately, I am not cheating. I don't know what more to say, and don't want to make this initial post longer than it need be.

All I'm seeing is 7.5% less spread due to lazer and less hip spread. Considering the "optimal" FMG load out isn't really optimal since prestiged players exist and if you're doing 25 damage it wont be enough to 4 shot them, I think the addition of the sight would be perfectly fine. imo, respectively.

I mean you being the Marshal of 2GA should have in your training guidelines that the trainers inform recruits of the rules no? NITRP is 3 rule infractions, if you obtain that in your first day of playing, you're not playing seriously, you're playing to mess around and get banned. Either that or the person who trained you is a incompetent or the training material is. -1, shrimps and Army General Alexander Conway basically put it perfectly. There is little to no harm in it being "edgy slavs". In fact thats probably the best definition of RU on the server, no?

My only real concerns are for the drastically different colors RU's factions have, theres no real cohesion and unity, it's all mixed about. US looks a lot more unified with Army being blue and it's SOC counterparts retaining green aspects while Marines and MARSOC have red respectively and SEALs have the dark grey, it fits well. I'd say make SSO a darker colour of 2GA's value. PDSS a bluish-purple maybe and GRU a lighter red-ish purple like V could possibly look nice. Also what about Alfa Group and Raider Regiment? Would their colors stay the same? +1 overall though, currently theres a lot of factions with similar colours and colours that make them seem out of place. (Bright neon pink for the T1 Vega nerds really makes them not seem edgy enough man)

Were the trees removed to highlight the terrain changes or will it be that open?

I mean SV-98 only got 100 so like... +1 though, this shit kinda heat and would be nice for US to have a silenced sniper counterpart.

-1, using the excuse of 'crouching increases my accuracy' doesn't help when you're lasering people with an AR that has 90max spread and reaches that spread in two shots. Yes, it does tighten the spread a bit, and accuracy slightly. Lets say you're using the lazer sight on your M4 too, you'll probably be sitting around maybe 75~%? Which is still a shit ton and still hard to full auto a target from medium range with, yet you do so with ease. @Torch You know a bit better about the CW code than I, if you know anything about how much crouching actually effects stats, care to share?

Just finished setting up my new pc and I come back to this. Fucking amazing. CQC finna be fun. Love the community-pulled updates man. Also I love that you brought the ST6 models back into the server's files, they look great. (They might have always been there, idk. From what I remember you removed them from the pack for faster DL)

hate crime

grats...

Not currently on the server. If you're suggesting a whole new CW content pack be added, then good luck. But maybe find one first without just saying "oh make it happen" 1. Model is not on the server. 2. No linked content pack. 3. So who do you want to do the color changes? Garnet? Unlikely. 4. Missed opportunity tbh to not suggest a Tachanka class since Kapkan is on the server and you want a tank with DP-28 Just suggest one, don't throw 6 possibilities, just put one that you think would best fit, and Garnet and the community can interpret it from there. -1 overall, the lack of community response sought out prior to this post is apparent, you're overall reasoning for this suggestion is really shit compared to Ting's, and Jugg's have not been a problem on this map at all so there is no real problem with "US having a better chance at winning."

Promise doesn't do much. You need approval from Manager+ to bypass the Age Requirement. Unless Draggy or Gildarts can confirm that you have approval, this should be moved and locked. -1, regardless even if you did get approval. You're by no means mature and quite frankly based on the way you handled being banned for cheating, you're by no means fit for staff.

Was thinking this over and thought a more suiting gun would be the Honey Badger from BER CW2.0. Or even swap these two around, have Honey Badger on Assault, MP5 on Tactical. Fits more into the current 'balance' tactical classes are supposed to have with SMG's/CQC and the Honey Badger could simply be given some small tweaks to match that of a kitted out AK-105(Frogmen AR). Honestly the G3A3 is just fucking ugly and really doesn't fit with SEALs. The Honey Badger is currently unused and quite frankly one of the nicest looking guns on the server. +1 to everything else though, I already talked over the other things with you so I'm pretty satisfied with everything else.

You don't take your own self-damage in war besides fall damage. Meaning I could shoot an RPG at my feet and take no damage and clear the whole fucking room. However, the damage that should have applied to myself will show up in logs. This is why it's a rule at the moment. (It applies to all explosives, not just RPG btw).

Got this error when I attempted to re-sign in.