AlexConway

Nice work though, happy to see the Battle Rifle fixed! The brick will be my go-to on enforcing PTS :^) Good work!

+1 MUCH better paragraphs. You're fun to be around, you seem to know the rules well. You definitely could be a positive influence as a staff member. Good luck!

he's had 1-2 massrdm bans, but there wasn't a Non-Mal ban back in the day

+1 - You have shown during your return that you are wanting to be a prominent member of the community, and a contributing one. You were a good staff member, though you had some disagreements with the leadership at the time, you were still a good staff. You've always been level-headed and fair in judgement.

+1 - Don't get me wrong, you weren't the "model" player for your years of playing; however I think at least I can remember, this was your first "major" incident. I may oppose people who have shown a history of unbans and rebans, but that's not your case. I think it's worth to give you a chance to come back and display this.

365

-1 As python said, I was full invis - as displayed by the Escape Menu. Xaldin and the other guy ran off, however I stayed behind; waited a good 10 seconds, then peaked. You killed me. In the last clip - I do show at the end there was no one behind me. (Last 3 seconds)

No I believe that falls under (At least from what I read)

-1 I think you've been unbanned so many times now. You've exhausted your appeal options. As for the "I've changed" - I think it's best to quote @Phantom and @Garnet: Ah and you are so proud of your 4 perm bans, 5 since you're currently banned: I don't know how someone is unbanned and re-permaed 5 times, but there has to be a limit. People can hardly get a second chance, you've wasted 5 already.

Yes, however donator weapons are always left out because people rely on them as a crutch in war (myself included). Donator weapons should SUPPLEMENT your loadout. NOT replace it. The fact that you can play virtually any class, and just use the AEK/Mosin/Orsis and makes you have an incredible advantage is not how the system was intended. If you feel change is needed, then you should likely +1 - this would indicate to the executive team that change is wanted. --- By no means is Kurtle the only one to say this: If you believe that change to the weapons should occur including SOME donor weapons, then you should +1 this - this shows that there is wanted change. People often mald in TS or OOC about getting one shot or getting lasered from across the map, but when comes time to open the doors for possible change, fall very short on it (including people opposing this change).

+1 - It's pretty self explanatory, if you have the credits, you should be able to buy the item. Waiting seems silly.

I mean, an M4 to the head will kill by one shot, so should that get buffed too? Garnet has never and will never make weapons based from "realism", it's down to gameplay. EDIT: Not meant to sound cunty - I don't know how else to phrase this

Description: Remove the reliance on the AEK by slightly changing the statistics Additional Information: There are 4 possible edits to the AEK, that would change it enough to remove it from a replacement to your class weapons. 1 - Damage - This is the most common nerf that people think of and is a valid option. It already has as @Jake said "Pencil Cartridge" so it should do less damage. 2 - Firerate - Before the tickrate change the firerate was much lower and the gun wasn't quite as good, as it is now Post-Tick change. Lowering this to compensate the change would return it to it's original state (Good, but not Meta) 3 - Aim Accuracy - Change the accuracy would allow it to be used in CQC without change, but would only really effect the Longer Range Combat, which it shouldn't be used in. 4 - Spread per Shot | Increase Percentage for Spread Per Shot The AEK has only recently become a meta/crutch because of tickrate change, increasing it's firerate; making it more over-powered.

Description: Donator Weapon Reliance Fix Reasoning/Additional Information: The suggestion is simple. Change the Orsis and Mosin damage to be roughly near 80. GRU, Rangers, DF, Vega, Elite Class Snipers would remain untouched, there is already a downside to these so further change isn't needed: Downside to classes is that you have to be on them to have the weapons. (Vega Group Recon would need be slotted @ 2 Slots to match DF.) Donator Weapons are supposed to accomplish 2 main objectives: Support the Server, and Support your main class weapons. There shouldn't be a case where Donor Weapons take over from your class weapons (like it is now), because they are extremely more reliable. Before some comments start rolling in: Garnet has said recently, that he'd be open to this changing so long as the active player-base, agree. I have bought the Orsis, Mosin - I too have spent many of dollars on the weapons for myself and for others; however, I feel that weapons you can EARN should better than weapons you can buy. The Orsis and Mosin would still be a great weapon post change; you will just need to toss in a bit more skill to use it then rely on it as a crutch. The game is devalued when every person who's played for longer than a few months, has either weapon, most cases both. (More draw for Rangers, DF, Vega, GRU, 2GA/11B Marksman)

I'd rather just bring back Silent Raiding then change the ROE - seems extremely complicated for something so niche. Seems like someone will get assassinated mid tryout which doesn't do anything constructive. It's not like we have PKs on the server either, so there's zero benefit to doing an assassination -1

Not my best graphic design work, but I can't keep working on it.

Me and Gamma always had an interesting dynamic, towards the end while he was in Vega, we would often DM back and forth on the antics going on in OOC. He was someone I could consider a friend, despite our interesting start. Gamma on US: God are all US gay as fuck Conway: No but I love men and dick Gamma: **silence** **[DarkRP] Gamma has been made an Russian Forces : Support* My thoughts go out to the friends and family of Gamma. It's sad to think that we won't be able to play on SWRP this time around like I had promised.

My proof is in my report; I came in asking to ban him for a week for "homophobia is not allowed" someone said to make a report I quoted this in reference to him saying "Join the VC etc"

You can create new identities on a whim in TS. You said "faggot" in your appeal so you have no problem saying it, and you have said stuff along this in the past. TFAR for Arma 3 - automatically adds anyone to your contacts while enabled, I've not turned it off in over six months, that ID was the only result that came up for "Horse", "Pony", or "Horseyyy" A 25 level takes roughly 2-3 minutes to create. You can hit the improve button it means nothing. You automatically start with an 8 or something. Go to CRTL+I make a new identity and select 25 level, takes like 2 minutes. There's a reason it wasn't detailed in my report or added to it. I didn't have proof of you saying the stuff in VC or you re-connecting. Also the reason Garnet didn't mention it.

It's either @horsegarrysmod or @Horseyy now btw!

Who are you reporting? [Staff/Player]: Player Your in-game name: 11A GA Alexander Conway Your SteamID (https://steamid.io/): STEAM_0:0:138807332 In-game name of reportee: N/A SteamID of reportee (https://steamid.io/): STEAM_0:1:177961535 | TeamSpeak ID: YTmZWsUiBoduc57OWcCbBvresM0= Date & Time of incident: 5/12/2021 @ 5:40 PM Timezone: EST What happened? (include any proof): Horse connected to the TS Server, just messaged me calling me a fag and to "kys" kill myself.