Yazmo ☣

Aim punch seems great, but it seems a lot stronger then CSGOs? And as broken mentioned it probably shouldn’t work on teammates, but I’m glad to see more ways to earn money!!

Added a few more map issues!

Okay so I agree with this. This is the EXACT opposite of what I am complaining about. You are adding more recoil but it consistent every time. That is a change I could get behind. I am very for this. I would make a separate post listing this idea, rather then what we have now. You have to understand what was talked about previous to your post was “lower recoil and lower damage”, which I will never stand for. But what you have just suggested is actually a really good idea. Thanks for communicating YOUR thoughts. But you could have started the post with stating this instead of “lower recoil and lower damage”. Cheers for the good sportsmanship and not giving up in the conversation.

The whole COD thing doesn’t matter. You could of said Halo, Black Squad, any shooter with low recoil low damage and it would not be healthy for garrysmod. ThTs that part that bothers me. By any amount of stat change low recoil + low damage is not fun to play.

And that’s great. It’s glad to see a positive change like this happen and seeing you trying different ways actively to do stuff like this. But on the subject of weapon change the words “low recoil and lower damage” in general is not a healthy change in my opinion. As I’ve said numberous amounts of times the low risk low reward playstyle is boring and leaves no room for outplay or self improvement as a player.

Are these active? Or are these in the past? In my opinion, I’d give you a chance to be staff. You’ve got a lot of play time, and are are well respected. I don’t think I’ve ever had a negative encounter with you so cheers to that. The negatives I do see however is that you might be an active staff somewhere else and the grammar in your staff app could use some fine tuning. +1, but I’d recommend adjusting the grammar in your app. Either proof read it or get someone to aid you in the grammar.

Ethan brought up Halo and COD just to reference shooter games in general where teams are auto balanced and will always be almost even. Not to mention match making.

But it hasn’t been mentioned once in this whole thread. And thanks for the advice I never knew that lmao

Doesn’t matter if it was one weapon or 5 weapons. The ones that are different are going to be used for the better. COD weapons had the exact same thing. We haven’t had any sort of plans or ideas from you yet only the general idea which I am opposed to. If you want to provide us a plan I’d be more then happy to look it over and maybe change my opinion. For the moment with the facts I have this is how I feel about changing weapons to being similar to the COD4 M16 (low damage low recoil) Many change to weapons where we lower recoil and damage is shitty in my opinion. If you are willing to provide a more of an idea then just “weapons with lower recoil and lower damage” then yeah, then I’d seem close minded.

Because we tried it for almost 2 months with the MP5. And we saw how that went. What’s the point in assimilating all the weapons into the same shitty laser if we just had weeks of complaints about a laser weapon. But yeah. If you want to use up YOUR time to rebalance everyweapon to the same laser where one has 1% less recoil and it is the one that is abused. Then go ahead.

Because IMO any weapon donator or not if it is a laser is encourages the passive playstyle with no outplay like I’ve been talking about.

But my point is Gambler I don’t care if the weapon was called or looked like the MP5, a M16, an AEK, or a literall fucking laser the gameplay it provided was abused and was incredibly boring and simple to use. It was saddening to the point where more then 80% of the community wanted it nerfed. And now we want it returned in a different weapon(s). Low recoil low damage is so fucking bad for the game as it gives no room for outplays and rewards only the player who peeks first. The high damage high recoil rewards agressive players who know how to use their brains. Thats my biggest issue with this change.

Also I don’t know if you’re fucking just a numb skull or what but Black Ops was not mentioned fucking once in this whole thread. Also Phantom specifically mentioned what type of COD he wanted to simulate and which weapon was ideal.

No shit but it’s biggest issue is the weapons. We just had months of the fucking MP5 ruining gameplay and now we have a thread to bascially bring it back with more types of it. It could very well hurt to try.

This is the rant section so I can just rant and maybe you can agree but maybe you don’t but this isn’t a suggestion thread because I know how hard it’d get bashed because that’s how it is I just wanted to voice my opinion and maybe people agree and see what I’m talking about. I fucking HATE the gameplay of the new map. Don’t get me wrong, I like the visuals and aesthetics of the new map, but it fucking blows to play on. Okay so here are the reasons why 1. Mountains: MOUNTAINS FUCKING SUCK and they encourage camping and snowballing. If you get the high ground with third person it is next to impossible to die if you know how to play it correctly. Little ridges are good where players can mount from both sides, but when you have to circle all the way around the mountain to climb it, it fucking blows. It slows down gunfights, and rewards passive shitty play styles where you can just set up cross fire on two mountains and never lose. Taiga was so good because trees and small ridges allow outplaying and agressive playstyles to flourish because nothing slowed down foot speed and there was multiple routes to flank anyone. Now we just have mountains with shitty chokeholds everywhere on the map. 2. SLIPPERY SNOW: WHY THE FUCK is sliding a thing. If mountains wasn’t enough to punish aggressive playstyles, sliding is. Sliding makes it so micro adjusting for every foot step is a “mechanic” to think about. And the counter to this “mechanic” IS TO CAMP ON A FUCKING MOUNTAIN in third person and just be a bitch because why push when you can just hide and not be punished even when the enemy knows your location. 3. DARK MAP WITH SHITTY LIGHTING: I don’t like how dark the map is. This is a lot more personal preference but it’s fucking night time which is aids enough as it is because you have to adjust Gamma settings and such to see player models stick out from Garry’s Mod shitty rendering and it overall just bothers me. Then if that wasn’t enough there is little to no street lights, 3/5 objectives have literally zero light outside of them and the ones that do (Comp and fac) have awfully lighten lights that don’t do anything but bug out when you peek around corners and make shitty materials pop out. 4. 5 objectives: In my opinion, this is the worst change of all. It heavily favours the side with more numbers as it is impossible to power creep an objective last minute, now you gotta take two which is impossible because you now have to split your low numbers. Another reason I hate it is simply the fact that it makes the more complicated for no good reason. Base factions are a huge part in wars as it is the meat of the army and is what either decides if the % is going up in your favour or not. The need to over rotate and just simply sending them to another objective is awful as most players don’t have the time to learn a map with 5 objectives and FUCKING MOUNTAINS in the way of everything. Just my opinion. But I’d much rather gameplay of the Taiga map. Tell me what you think, or maybe I’m just a cuck for wanting to be agressive. But I HATE snowballing especially when MRP isn’t a game where you can control the numbers. Just seems absurd to me. Thanks for reading my rant Cheers, -Yax.

So we complain about the laser MP5 and then now we want all weapons to be the same. If this change goes through I’m not sure I could keep playing. The fun in higher recoil and higher damage is high risk high reward. It allows different play styles and how people use weapons. Using “call of duty” weapons is brain numbing and removes all thought process of anyone engageing anyone. In general weapon balancing in GG has been fucking brutal but that is for another discussion, but I’d rather it be what we have right now where the AEK, FN, and G3A3 are dominating the field because mid range is of course the most general weapon use. Sterling and FMG have faster kill times and uses at close range and the Orsis, M95 and other snipers ARE viable at long ranges minus the shitty hit reg. But in my opinion ARs are in a good state and the other weapons are more or less properly balanced around them. This doesn’t help anyone. This is 100% true. With low damage weapons it’s next to impossible to out play opponents especially when out numbered. Whoever aims first wins. There’s a reason CSGO has a longer life span then one call of duty. It is more enjoyable when experience and knowledge wins a duel rather then who peeks first. I can’t even tell if you’re meming why the fuck would anyone go to a SOC if it was a downgrade to the base faction. Already most of the SOC classes in RU have shit guns so why boost the base factions. COD4’s weapon balance was one of the worst of all COD games, and was not what made it fun. You can’t say that guns didn’t have too much recoil and not a shit ton of damage when your are referring to like 3 of the viable guns and not the whole barrack. The AEK has 100% accuaracy first shot then goes up the same for the first 3 or so shots. It is reliable at long ranges due to tap firing and it is reliable close range due to pretty simple spraying. I’d rather a little RNG then lasers. TL;DR if we want to continue with the shitty snowball meta we have now with the slippery snow and the obnoxious mountains with one way to climb them without finding obscure edges, then yes just add lasers into everyone’s hands. But if we want to keep any integrity of a fun shooter with different viabilitys and rewards aggressive play styles and players who can use their brains I’d recommend keeping the guns how they are now and balancing guns around the ARs.

I don’t really agree because GRU has grenades removed from them because they are the long range class, not the CQC like SSO.

+1 , balance the explosives, give people more of a reasoning to play on RU. Gives them more incentive to work towards Vega.

Not one person has seen this change in you, and people certainly don’t change over night. Actions speak louder then words. You also just just admitted to having a frozen rank. There is ZERO exception as to why you thought it was a good idea to apply after having your rank frozen. If anything this should have been an eye opener for you. EDIT: DURING YOUR PROCESS in your staff app you just made a stupid profile update. Nice.

I like the application, and I’ve seen you around in game and it’s wortb giving you a shot. You goof around which can be good and personable and if you learn to control when to do it and when it’s appropriate you can be be a great staff member. Aswell, I have never witnessed you do anything immature in OOC, forums, or any public environment. You can add me to referrals buddy. +1

I will not be changing my -1 to a +1. You are extremely toxic and can’t do things without people agnoldging you. I have both witnessed this and heard it from others. -1

I'm taking a mental health break. Ever since quitting my job, breaking up with my girl 1 month ago, and some family stuff to round it out I just need a break from life. I'm going to my buddy's cottage for a week, there is no wifi and I'm going to just sit it out for a bit. I think my data has coverage there so I might be active on forums, but I cannot promise much. Ill be back by 8/18 most likely. Cheers, Yax.

You seem more and more power hungry by every post. Try to improve on what has been told to you and suck it up. If you cannot deal with that then you need to find something else to play.

This is just not true. But okay.