eXg-Buddha 729 Posted June 17, 2020 Share Posted June 17, 2020 Just now, Larry_The_Potato said: Clip 2 I don't even hit the guy... Clip 5 if i saw him through the hill why would I keep looking around? I believe the ban was for silent aim/aim assistance, not wall hacks. You may not have seen him through the hill or even killed him, but your mouse movements and snaps are the incriminating part. Link to comment
Community Director AlexConway 1,166 Posted June 17, 2020 Community Director Share Posted June 17, 2020 (edited) 2 minutes ago, br0ken said: Basically asked him what would happen if it's a ban or not and that was the response Can you show that via DMs? In TS today D Rose said something completely contrary. As far as we know it just says "Managers can ban" not "Go ban Larry with the evidence provided" Edited June 17, 2020 by AlexConway Link to comment
Shibe 294 Posted June 17, 2020 Share Posted June 17, 2020 Didn't this man say in ts "I couldn't find the silentaim" 1 1 Link to comment
Doof123 54 Posted June 17, 2020 Share Posted June 17, 2020 Just now, Shibe said: Didn't this man say in ts "I couldn't find the silentaim" Context? 1 Link to comment
Sim_One 116 Posted June 17, 2020 Share Posted June 17, 2020 +1 Coming from a former hackers these clips aren't even that sus... He makes the same flick every time, other than that they are just normal kills 1 1 5 Link to comment
Duglas 98 Posted June 17, 2020 Share Posted June 17, 2020 (edited) Why is broken using a 3rd party client when we got told that NO ONE should be using it, and only managers should be pushing perm bans. Edited June 17, 2020 by Duglas 1 2 4 Link to comment
Bozee 202 Posted June 17, 2020 Share Posted June 17, 2020 (edited) +1 this man flicks be insane but he no hack, he just filthy... Edited June 17, 2020 by cbozee 1 1 1 3 1 Link to comment
JoeBudden 107 Posted June 17, 2020 Share Posted June 17, 2020 Once again another example of potentially banning someone who may have been hacking but fumbling it due to poor communication and lack of thought. Everyone pushing for this ban is from 1 friend group out to get Larry and everyone pushing for his unban are Larry's friends (including me). Having done this before my self, this was a rushed ban with mediocre proof that can easily be argued, not to mention one of the managers you guys got "confirmation" from is now denying it. This could have been a done deal if it was thought over more and more damning proof was collected, speaking of damning proof: 9 minutes ago, Duglas said: Why is broken using a 3rd party client when we got told that NO ONE should be using it, and only managers should be pushing perm bans. And are we going to acknowledge the fact that broken is legit using ESP in the 2nd clip https://youtu.be/PydQ9oKpjSc 2 1 1 Link to comment
Shibe 294 Posted June 17, 2020 Share Posted June 17, 2020 14 minutes ago, Doof123 said: Context? we were saying he shouldve used silent aim and he was like i couldnt find it Link to comment
Bozee 202 Posted June 17, 2020 Share Posted June 17, 2020 2 minutes ago, JoeBudden said: Once again another example of potentially banning someone who may have been hacking but fumbling it due to poor communication and lack of thought. Everyone pushing for this ban is from 1 friend group out to get Larry and everyone pushing for his unban are Larry's friends (including me). Having done this before my self, this was a rushed ban with mediocre proof that can easily be argued, not to mention one of the managers you guys got "confirmation" from is now denying it. This could have been a done deal if it was thought over more and more damning proof was collected, speaking of damning proof: its actually crazy how they take so much more evidence to ban other hackers, but this one was just a go with minimal evidence, the evidence isn't "damning" sure its a lil sus, but nothing to warrant a ban in my personal opinion.... idk I could be biased as I am Larry's friend but at the end of the day this seems kind of bullshit 1 3 Link to comment
Ting 368 Posted June 17, 2020 Share Posted June 17, 2020 17 minutes ago, Larry_The_Potato said: Clip 2 I don't even hit the guy... mi amigo, if you think SNAPPING on to someone with ROBOT like movements is natural, you must hit your head with a tenderizer on a daily basis. -1 9 1 1 Link to comment
Sim_One 116 Posted June 17, 2020 Share Posted June 17, 2020 1 minute ago, Ting said: mi amigo, if you think SNAPPING on to someone with ROBOT like movements is natural, you must hit your head with a tenderizer on a daily basis. -1 Ting imma be real with you man, i don't think you know the difference between flicks and aimbot 1 1 1 Link to comment
Vlone 78 Posted June 17, 2020 Share Posted June 17, 2020 -1 Clearly u aimlocked on a guy through a mountain which is very sus. Link to comment
Popular Post D_Rose 431 Posted June 17, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted June 17, 2020 Accepted With reviewing of this appeal and all of the evidence that was reviewed. The ban had seemed to be rushed with the evidence that was given. The evidence also could have a capability of not being 100% accurate. The player will be unbanned and the situation will be handled. 1 2 1 1 15 Link to comment
Recommended Posts