Jump to content

Smity_

Restricted Member
  • Posts

    439
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Smity_

  1. On 1/29/2024 at 11:46 PM, PIague said:

    Trusted Member System

     

    Description

     

    • Only specific people have access to this role by strict distribution. - Strictly assigned through applying for this role with specified requirements e.g. (Review of reputation/Past disciplinary actions, Interview with high ranking members of staff who have authority to grant said role, Members of staff could vote for applying members role, Playtime on server may come into account of a decision.)

     

    • Examples of perk use in RP. - Hydraulic use could be put towards levitating platforms or a launching hobo build, Buoyancy could be put to use for boat crafts or floating bridges, Wheels and ball sockets could be used for transport like a bus if someone wanted to rp as a bus driver, Ropes can be used for hanging props up for decoration or a parkour event.

     

    Reasons

     

    • Benefits for the server. -  Higher motivation for building as a whole, more elaborate building techniques, extended freedom in regards to roleplay (Which would boost player base morale).

     

    • Benefits of the trusted member role would be privileges to access previously blocked tools. - Garnets Darkrp has always had a bland building experience with limited permissions due to the lack of trust of its players base but has never considered a trusted member role with permissions to use disabled tools e.g. (Hydraulics, Wheels, Ropes, Buoyancy, Ability to unfreeze props etc).

     

    Additional Information

     

    In conclusion, the addition of the trusted member system would benefit both the server and the players that are granted the role by expanding roleplay options in the server ranging anywhere from new gambling techniques, extended roleplay for hobos, participation in events designing parkour, Roulette, Challenges, Deathmatch and possibly stages for talent shows incase game masters aren't confident in building. With thesextended permissions, server events could easily be morexciting by introducing new ideas/designs from the trusted members.

     

    If you really think you want to do more just apply for staff. And most of the things that you mentioned are only given to Super Admins. So if anything that would be something done by garnet. Even in a very hypothetical scenario if was the SA of the server I wouldn't trust anyone besides myself and the owner to use those tools. The risk of crashing the server outweighs any point mentioned in this post. 

    Basically, your suggestion is to give access to stuff and have no responsibility of staff duties. which is already a huge red flag.  

  2. 7 minutes ago, Jackal said:

    you would need to have it written

    It doesn’t have to be written by any means. Unless it explicitly says you can crouch jump in RP. If anything it says in administration that you can’t jump at all in combat.

    • Dumb/Shitpost 2
    • Disagree 4
  3. 41 minutes ago, Jackal said:

    You quoted the rule I already referenced and mentioned clearly that that entire thread by Jim Trash is in the DENIED section. im hurt you didn't read my appeal and suggestion 😞

    I quoted the rule, that was used in an appeal while I was staff. Which has been in affect for awhile. If you’re saying Jim Trash was staff in August of 21’ during that appeal then idk. But that’s how crouch jumping warns have been enforced for the longest time. Idk when it was removed from writing but it got removed at some point. 

  4. I was the person that made the call on this, The reason of why crouch jumping is only allowed for jumping over objects is because of this exact reason. Sure was the intent malicious, no. But did he break his hit box to get an advantage and get to speed around that corner, Yes. Even though the point of what you did in the clip wasn’t intended to break your hit box but that’s what happened. 

     

    I agree that it needs more clarification, I’ve already touched on that with other people. Anyways technically there is not a direct rule regarding crouch jumping. But it is something that has been known for a very long time to be FailRP. Which what you did was very FailRP. 

     

    I would like to also mention a post from 2 years ago. yes i was still staff then, Like I said the unwritten rule needs clarification. Even though it was written before but got removed at some point. A lot of things fall under failrp. That wouldn’t be written. But anyways "Intentional Crouch-Jump Spam and Crouch Spam= FailRP | Crouch-Jumping during war or a RP scenario is FailRP unless it is to get over an obstacle. Recording needed before warn" and in this instance of what you did it wasn’t over or onto an object. 

     

    • Haha 1
    • Agree 1
  5. 1 minute ago, Lex_ said:

    However, another Tali had run up shortly after.

    There was no other Taliban There at all. I could see him in the bush at the start. 
     

     

    2 minutes ago, Lex_ said:

    - you wouldn't have the knowledge.

    The knowledge of it being the same person and only person there? The person that walked up a long time after. You can tell I see the Afghan Defender Model in the bush at the start of the clip and see him in the bush later. So idk what you're talking about

  6. In-game name: 75R STB Colonel Smity
    SteamID (https://steamid.io/): STEAM_0:0:204070455
    Staff members in-game name: Towelie
    Staff members SteamID (/id (name): STEAM_0:1:555365615
    Date & Time of incident: 9:30 PM 
    Timezone: EST
    Warn Reason: RDM
    What happened? (include any proof): ISI Agent Thorn Was Shooting from A bush on the corner of the base towards an Weapons Trader at the front of the base. https://streamable.com/jl0evm 
    Why should your warn be removed?: The ROE states with a weapon out, Which means if that player shoots a weapons and is the only player there at that time means they had a weapon and can be killed.  If they have proof of not having a weapon out at all then sure the warn stands. The argument of /rolling against a player that killed a friendly. But you can confirm the gun shots happening right infront of me in the clip and nobody else was there. 

  7. As much as I would like to -1 this app like I did last time, I think he deserves some sort of shot. At the end of the day he can put on a tight leash and removed from the gm team if he fucks up. 
    So +1 from me. 

    • Like 1
    • Disagree 1
  8. 1 hour ago, Dillan said:

    ()- let's go back to classic reserves, really go back. Let's allow factions to decide their own standards for reserves, and the rank they wish to cap at reserves. Less overarching, and more autonomy.

    Worked for years untill changed, and since that change reserves were a pet project of management teams. 

    Constant removal, return, removal, return. Autonomy could breath some life into the reserves programs. 

    This is just an opinion and thinking outside of the box.

    As much as I would like this to happen nothing would change besides Faction leaders giving all of their friends Reserves. It worked a long time ago because every faction had more new faces than it did now. The whole idea that I have now is to allow players still help the factions as thats what they were supposed to do instead of just using the whitelist for war and able to leave factions that you got bored off. Right now, its basically F U and work your ass off to Officer Again to do anything beneficial for that faction. See what I mean? 

    And regarding the Pet Management Project, It's been an Issue with base Managements because they were lazy and basically did what they wanted with them. Autonomy is what this suggestion would be. Reserves would be Coded in that they would be removed after 1 year. Anytime before that would be based on the faction leader. Which allows the Faction leader Control over the reserves at some point. 

     

    Also, This needs to be a discussion in Discord or somewhere else besides here. As thats what happened on the other Reserves post that eventually didn't help Ozzy change the reserves to how they wanted. So he did them how he wanted which basically removing them entirely instead of listening to the community.   

    To @Shibe  @shax999 @Katowice  @ReynoldsCan you explain why you Disagreed? 

  9. This Reserve System is like the old system before the current one. But with a few changes.

    Reserves
    You can have a total of 2 reserves. 1 reserve on each side. Ex. Delta Force and Taliban Reserves while being in Rangers.
    You can't use the whitelists once you have resigned and have reserves.
    Only can be used For tryouts/trainings.

    Staff Vote
    The Officer will have 7 days to ask Colonel/leader of the faction for reserves once they have left. The Leader is to contact S. Admin+ to put in the vote or staff.
    They will make a staff vote in the staff discord.
    Then the executives will decide when the reserves are accepted or denied and contact the Leader or the officer accordingly. 
    If the faction leader at the time of your resignation (or newly appointed faction leader if it’s a leader resigning) agrees with the request, he/she will submit the request to S. Admin+. 

    Revoking of Reserves
    Executives will take action regarding the behavior of players who hold reserves.
    If a faction leader wants to remove reserves they have to contact the executives with a valid reason and they can remove them if they have a valid reason.
    Faction Leaders can remove them for any reason after 6 months of the reserves been granted and the Reserves are Guaranteed to be Removed after One Year.
    Also Reserves are a one-time deal. If they get removed for any reason, they are gone unless re-earned again. 

    Coming off of Reserves
    Reservists can come off reserves if Faction Leader Confirms it and can do evaluations and can place the person at the max rank of O-1. When they come off they have a mandatory 2 week cooldown if placed at an officer rank.

    The Faction Leader needs to contact executives if someone comes off reserves.

    The changes are:
    You can't use the whitelists while having reserves other than helping with Tryouts/trainings.
    Guaranteed Reserves for 6 months (unless a valid reason for them to be removed)
    Faction leaders can remove them if they want after 6 months and will be removed after One year

    This is to essentially allow players to come off reserves at some point and if they don't in a long time they can be removed. 

    One big thing about this Suggestion is that the 6 month time frame can be changed to 3 months if needed to give Faction leaders more power over the reserves. 
     

    • Creative 1
    • Disagree 4
    • Agree 2
  10. -1, Looking through your Past staff apps it appears you have put in 50 hours over the last 3 years. Sorry brother you don’t exist. And I still can’t find you being an Head Admin or even a staff member. You say 2019?

    • Like 1
  11.  

    Hello Mr. Skrt,

    After discussing with myself and I, I have looked into what you have mentioned into why you should be unbanned and I completely disagree with you. There is a clip of you playing “legit” by no-scoping someone. Sure the no-scope is legit but whats not legit about it is the fact you are playing with invisible hands. Which is giving yourself an advantage. Maybe not as big of an advantage of when you were cheating but still an advantage that other players can’t do because it’s against the rules. Which leads to me you’re just going to do the same thing like you did a long time ago. Also next time. If you want unbanned don’t break more rules by making alts and trying to enjoy a server that you screwed yourself over on and tell your buddies not to be toxic on your appeals when people are bringing valid points.
     

    Final Message for you skrt and everyone, Actions have consequences. 

    Denied. 

    • Cringe 1
  12. ZCvTeiNi92uKHlP3vx71mXv8usBSqz1YzwqexMQp7VUv6F5O68BdOlwHZN2wAWEbPD7fKKbfCKsvqNe2aifn99ta_hplv1cpizZaGxFa5TWqusHsnxVGYO6IyPdoJK9qAmxQIV0kpLYCx_ZBygkpYrlKPF2afLDgHxbxuUbTGKNFDuyv5Z_lDmoyMA 

     Accepted

    Please note that accepted suggestions will not necessarily be implemented into the server, but rather forked over to the development team for a second opinion, at which point they are free to choose between implementation or not. Which means if this is abused by any means, Garnet can remove this at any point IF this gets added.

    • Agree 1
  13. I have to comment on this one. What if we have that concept during peacetime? Just so War can still utilize the U team chat. Instead of making U in your suggestion what about /r? Just an Idea because getting base faction players to set their channel can be aids. 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Guidelines