Jump to content
DarkRP Rules Updated (4/28/2024) ×

Pencil

Member
  • Posts

    465
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Pencil last won the day on September 12 2020

Pencil had the most liked content!

6 Followers

About Pencil

Recent Profile Visitors

8,728 profile views

Pencil's Achievements

Explorer

Explorer (4/14)

  • Very Popular
  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Posting Machine
  • Dedicated

Recent Badges

767

Reputation

  1. u stankin 

  2. Trade off between the two used to be that Merc had faster speed but only a 100 damage sniper while both ghillies (now ghillie and recon) had the 125 damage sniper. Simply reinstate it back to that if you feel ghillie/recon is overshadowed by venal/merc.
  3. +1 , has a lot of experience both in & out of the community and has currently been showing great progress on MRP! Good luck special, I hope you get this position!
  4. Pencil

    [MRP] Skirmish

    To this I'd suggest; 1. A quick-draw rule in which you cannot pull out a weapon when in view and within (insert reasonable distance) 2. A capped zone during Skirmish is KOS-able, and any unit firing onto the cap point subjects the people around them to be KOS as well. So if a AFG shoots at US on a cap while the AFG teammates don't have guns out, they would still all be KOS. 2.(a) This would also apply to AFG shooting US off of cap points. I.E if they were shooting at a US enroute to OBJ, all AFG around the person shooting would be KOS-able.
  5. Pencil

    [MRP] Skirmish

    +1, would give reason for recon squads as they can actually get intelligence on 'suspicious civilians' moving towards and objective. There should definitely be rules about basecamping during Skirmish though. To decentivize basecamping, we could make it so that in order for objectives to be capped, you must stay on them. So if you are off of the objective, the % will constantly drop down. Hear me out, how about something more like artillery strikes and air strikes that certain people could use. So the GA/Marshal would delegate as to who has permission to use each bank, preferably a whitelist and not steam:id tied as to avoid people using it while on a different life/character. These would only be usable during war/skirmish and would have a cooldown while costing huge amounts of money from the 'team fund'. Also maybe during war we could make it not usable on bases but during skirmish we could for some more chaos :). Let me know of your thoughts.
  6. oh god no I can't block your forum signature now 🥺

  7. let's not focus on the politics of a pfp, yet you as a head admin, quickly swapped yours back after realizing you were in the wrong after @Jackal's post
    e348942b26a2b3bf0a2453f7e892a47d.png

    1. Salmon

      Salmon

      Changed it and realized the whole thing was going in a direction it shouldnt be going literally as soon as Jackal made the post. I will take responsibility of that. Continuing on, I seriously think the app should move past the flag politics. Shit got mad dumb real fast, so to speak

    2. IAreGunner

      IAreGunner

      internet drama is so dumb. 

  8. Being able to understand the current standing of the server, getting used to written and unwritten rules that are in place at the time under the current management. Getting yourself established with the community again, and knowing generally what the community outlook is on staff interaction. -1. Do well within your position. Your 2nd paragraph goes in depth about issues and things that you could solve with your current officer position and faction, so I would suggest doing that first to branch yourself back into the general scene of the server.
  9. Will this apply to the [T2] and [T3] class as well? Also side note the [T3] SSO Class is assigned a garnet_sks that doesn't exist. If it could be swapped to the garnet_simsks or the sksd should it get the CZ858 that would be neat :).
  10. G4S aside, as me and Bishop are currently working on another group for the faction to be. As a Head Admin how do you feel that a third faction would impact the server in the way that it has been laid out via the suggestion?
  11. The concept and overall idea of a third faction I like, however I don't think G4S is the route to go. Considering we will swap to Tali soon, G4S supporting a terror organization goes against any and all of documents they have signed, such as the UN GC and the ICoC (of which they are a founder signatory). This entire concept still works were we to make it a pmc or an unnamed guerilla group/militarized group. The actual implications of a security company working with a terrorist organization and killing U.S troops would cause large problems for it's company. Overall, I think the economy features would bring a new wave of RP, but should be noted that it is a separate than the DarkRP base money we currently have. When shrimps originally suggested it, it was to be a combined amount in a menu and not something that was able to be dumped/transferred with the DRP money players have. Putting this here for anyone that is confused on that part. Another thing to note is though, that if the faction is just stacked with the best players, it will cause a similar flip-flop to when we have factions like Vega swap over to US for a war and just stomp. +1 to the idea, but -1 to the current proposed faction.
  12. Tali is missing defibs on most medic classes and some of it's factions don't even have medic classes to compensate for this trade off. Sure I can blow up a whole room, but should I die and U.S has medics, it means nothing.
  13. you do /roll and it generates a random number from 0-100 generally used to resolve instances in rp, i.e /roll to lockpick a crate, if you get below a certain number it wont open, etc.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Guidelines