Coyotee

Decent 22 person feed with the old RPG (one rpg did the job, pretty sure this was mass but Dillan and tech somehow got me out of it) Old RU when ally's were a thing (most RU/UK on at once that ive seen since I started playing) Some of the old DEVGRU boys Decent pic of the old DEVGRU+MARSOC Think this was posted already, still a banger

These responses might be the most unhelpful comments ever. Please refrain from saying this.

I think this might fuck over topshot more, I hope you realize topshot wouldn't do this in game, hes gonna toggle on and off to not be blatant, if you revert back to the video of topshot doing it, the part at the end of the video where hes looking at that gb, it looks EXACTLY the same to this video

So an accusation is your reasoning to knowing a staff is spectating you?

Im told that the only way to know if your getting spectated is if your a staff or a cheater, I fail to know some of your points in the appeal, almost all of them are hints towards cheating. Saying that you killed him isn't a reason knowing hes gonna spectate you -1

ohh it wasn't the cheat doing that mb.

Im sorry vac but ive never heard bullets ricocheting off of players before +1

Rip auto correct

In Game Name: Coyote (Blue Faith, El Coyoto, Donny Donowitz) Origin of name (Why you chose it): I think everyone knows where my name came from but for ones who didn't: my favorite youtuber at the time was Coyote Peterson, so I thought it was fitting to just name myself Coyote How long you've been on GG (Put the date you joined if known): Early 2016 Favorite faction you've been in: I loved both Jesters and Taylers DEVGRU/Navy somewhat equally. I enjoyed the seriousness and skill that jesters navy had but had WAY more fun being admiral under Tayler for 8 months. Favorite memory on the server: Taylors Navy + Old RU

+1 don't think a body can fly into base that much. Bowlin was bowling in the wrong hood

Your clearly missing the whole point of my post

Pulling a sentence out of my suggestions that doesn't help the topic at hand won't help. I've clearly done some asking around about the usage of f6 and many lower ranks had no idea.

I think either you guys are just skipping over everything or just see in the title "remove", I stated in the post that I've realized that a fairly high percentage of you guys won't want to remove it, so I've posted suggestions about fixing it. If your gonna comment saying no to the removal only, please also look at my revamp suggestions and comment on those, that's the main reason I put them in so people didn't just -1 just for removal.

Third person, a topic i was fine with when i joined back to the server a few days ago until it dawned on me that a LOT of people abuse it to the point i wanted to express my feelings on this subject. Obviously since i just joined you might think i have no "experience" with said topic, but if any of you remember old csdesert garnet, there was a reason why almost everyone hated third person.... ABUSERS. I can assure you this post is legit and not a rational decision from me. I want to point out im not making this post to frustrate people that use this feature frequently, im just pointing out mine and others outlook on it that believe it could potentially be removed or revamped. Im stating this in two different options (removal/revamped) because i know for a fact the select individuals who do abuse this will defend third person to the death, so im up for the option of fixing it or removing it. Pleased dont be biased towards this if you use it regularly, provide actual evidence and/or statements that regard to this post. Ways to fix Third-person (suggestions/thoughts) 1. Making it a locked third-person for everyone. Doing this will allow a more balanced system compared to the current third-person. Many new privates and even higher ranks dont know that you can use F6 to configure it so its not the default one. Although configuring third person is good for moving it to right shoulder or left, i think that the one option to make it higher should be taken away. 2. Making the player unable to shoot in third-person Although this will be a controversial option, this can reduce the overuse of pre-firing over hills, obstacles and etc. One of the more annoying things that comes with third person is pre-firing in general while in third person, ive noticed many times in wars that its nearly impossible to counter people that pre-fire you over a hill your running up (the enemy being at the apex of the hill). 3. Removing third-person This will be my last option since like i stated above this option will be the most heavily disagreed on. Ive already stated most of my points on why it should be removed in suggestions "1." and "2." but wanted to summarize quickly for the people who skimmed through my sloppy writing fast. Pre-firing: people at the apex of a hill with thirdperson on ready to pre-fire said target. How high you can make third person: One thing i know everyone that abuses third person have set (pretty much you cant counter this if the enemy is smart about it) , although this was abused in early garnet, it is happening again (this is the exact reasoning on why it was removed ages ago). In the end, since im joining back to the community, i want to see balance in the server and not see small things people can abuse, wanted to point this out so you guys know im not making this out of pure frustration nor to cause an uproar and negativity in this post.

Definitely add buildings or objects in bland parts of the map where things can be hosted (tryouts, sims etc.), Since UK isnt used maybe it could be an objective maybe instead of tc. Having no trees at all is a good thing, have people rely on the mountains instead of trees to hide. Lastly adding more to OP, making it bigger/adding more to it

Although the tunnel is apart of US Base, back in the day this was a legit rule (you were allowed to use it after war started, not when war starts), reasoning why is very self explanatory

My end goal was never to be a "bigger man" don't know where you got that from. Im just trying to show you that I never had any intention on basecamping if that's what you think it was, that's my end goal.

the question im wondering too. This wouldn't be like this if you just realized my position on the manner and noticed I never intended on basecamping and dropped it.

That's the thing. I would 100% say I did it if I did. But that's the whole counter argument im making, my perspective doesn't show him on the building hence my frustration. In all honesty im not arguing over this because of a warn, if in the end I get a warn I wont be mad (I would only hold a grudge to the people blowing this out of proportion because that's what kinda person I am) , im arguing over this because I never intended to base camp if that's what oat thinks happened, all that I was doing was sniping on a hill that's safe to use killing people as soon as they get out of base.

"extremely toxic"

You have every right to respond. You although shouldn't have a complete argument with the person getting reported.

Smooch over private after you just blew things out of proportion? Whats your end goal pencil? Your sending mixed signals over something you should have never been apart of.