Jump to content
DarkRP Rules Updated (4/28/2024) ×

Fupert1

Member
  • Posts

    74
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Fupert1 last won the day on August 8 2020

Fupert1 had the most liked content!

About Fupert1

  • Birthday October 3

Recent Profile Visitors

2,521 profile views

Fupert1's Achievements

Collaborator

Collaborator (7/14)

  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In

Recent Badges

231

Reputation

  1. sexy lil mama

  2. I understand that it wasn't Medinator or you, but your apparent reason for this post was to bring light to issues within MRP that need to be addressed. Is Toyto's voice an issue that needs to be addressed? There's a way to address shit without being overly toxic and unnecessary
  3. Yeah the right way to deal with toxicity in the community is making an anonymous post allowing people to shit on each other pubicly. There's some valid shit in the document, but you let someone go off on Toyto for his fucking voice and talking too much? How the fuck is that a community issue that needs to be addressed.
  4. This sounds like more of a joke to me, I don't really see a reason to punish him just for this. But the way Buddha's been acting lately it's pretty insane to me that he still has a rank in game and on the forums. I don't play darkrp, I don't know how much you do for it, if you do anything at all, but it really seems like you must be doing a whole fucking lot for it if you're getting away with this much shit.
  5. You didn't even bother reading Aidan's latest post. Reserves are rarely used anymore for factions that are actually dying. Admin abuse is going over your reach/what you're allowed to do. If you payed any attention to MRP you'd know Aidan is allowed to do this, and if you payed any attention to this post you'd see that Garnet is supporting it. You probably just got tagged in the army discord saying that your reserves are getting removed so you came on to complain about it.
  6. I think a lot of people, including myself didn't deserve keeping their reserves, but I'd rather have all reserves just managed by staff with less restrictions than this.
  7. I don't even understand what you're suggesting. This just kinda looks like a post that is a reply to shrimps' suggestion instead of an actual separate suggestion defining exactly what you're suggesting
  8. Just read the post and every comment before you reply. It's not hard
  9. I don't think that many people would actually leave the server. I've seen this shit happen on other servers where players end up staying, cause the wipe of the factions was actually refreshing, and gave purpose to being in those factions. It wouldn't really cause a shit storm for the base factions, If anything it'd actually help them. The main reason behind wiping the SOC factions isn't handpicks, it's just one part of it. It's good that you haven't handpicked, but it's still hard to give props to Rangers with the people they're passing. They don't really act the best lmao
  10. I wouldn't expect you to understand what happened with GB considering you aren't active at all. Jackal's GB is actually a decent example of what could happen if all of the SOC factions were wiped. The only negative thing about the faction were the handpicks, and how long all the members stayed. All of the members left or were removed, cause playing US for wars is genuinely unenjoyable, which leads back to multiple issues with multiple factions on both sides. I don't want every faction to be led by a veteran. I just want every faction to be led by some competent person, regardless of how long they've been here. I'm open to other people leading even if they are somewhat new. This suggestion heavily ties into staff, and to an extent, there should be some staff involvement in factions. Trying new leaders only works when there's a staff management presence that would be able to remove said new leader if it wasn't working. The faction issue itself could be handled without people having to make actual forum suggestions for it, if there was willing executive staff. There's even a problem with getting good higher staff now since their sits matter more than if they deserve it or how they carry themselves. I'm not trying to shit on Gildarts, but I think it's come to the point where there should be at least a manager for MRP. There's been plenty of factions that were wiped due to the leaders negligence for allowing certain players in their faction, despite those players not breaking rules or being inactive. The standard for SOC factions shouldn't just be that their players don't break rules and consistently play the server. Leaders can and have been removed for just straight up being bad leaders. Do you objectively think your factions good? Then explain why wiping your faction is a bad idea. Why should you keep leading? A lot of people have responded to this idea by criticizing against the new leaders, and talking about how bad they would do, instead of how good the current leaders are doing. If you really want to change my opinion, or Bishop's opinion, or Jackal's opinion then give us a reason to, cause right now I ain't seeing any +1
  11. The problem is that Embassy's cap point doesn't perfectly capture the room. You have to stand in the middle of the room to actually be on the point.
  12. Purposely having a low numbers in your faction is actually a good thing. If no ones good enough to join, then no ones gonna join. I don't need to fill my faction with random ass people to appease others so they stop calling my faction dead. I'm surprised you've been here for as long as you have and you still haven't figured that out.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Guidelines