Moabkilr45

First of all, whenever US leaves base, they are ALWAYS at risk of being shot at while they are outside of base doing what they do, or making there way to a claimed area, RP or not (Unless GM/Staff Enforced) Secondly, US always have their weapons out when outside of base for the aforementioned reason, although they may be afraid of traps the quickdraw clause in the rules makes being "gunned downed point-blank" not only unlikely, but also punishable if the scenario you are presenting in the sentence containing the quote were to be if US were talking to Tali face to face and one of them decides to pull out their guns and kill them. Speaking of such scenario being gunned down like that is highly unlikely due to the fact that US always having their weapons out when outside of base. The only case this would really apply to is if a Tali were to ambush them from an area they were looking in, however I doubt the Concealment clause would reasonably cover that. Speaking of which... We do this anyway. We know the US would immediately kill us if they see us with our weapons out. As our ROE is "All US outside of Base/Claimed area are KOS" I'd imagine the US ROE are along the lines of "Any Tali observed to be possessing a weapon are KOS, Otherwise they are not KOS.", This concealment clause wouldn't do anything. See, this clause is made completely unnecessary due to one simple fact: The US are the pray, Taliban are the hunters. Not only that, this clause would actually restrict roleplay and the following scenarios would not be possible if this were to be implemented. 1. Drug deals gone bad Some US soldiers wants to sell [Insert Narcotics] to some Taliban soldiers, however they find out the [Insert Narcotics] and this retaliate by starting a shootout. 2. Checkpoint inspection gone base A US soldier stops a car at a checkpoint, the driver is asked to pop open the trunk however he makes the excuse that he can't open the trunk from the drivers seat and has to unlock it with his key. He opens the trunk, pulls out a sawed off shotgun and kills the guardsman. 3. Kidnaping 3 US Soldiers are on patrol on a busy street, they are approached by 7 guys who split up to surround them and draw their weapons. Hopelessly out gunned, out numbered, and out positioned, They surrender and are captured. This is a Military Roleplay Server featuring insurgents. There are going to be gunfights and there is literally no need to restrict those gunfights outside of the quickdraw rule in anyway whatsoever.

+7

Imagine appealing a ban for cheating and use a clip that shows you aimboting lmfao

I hope some of you guys know that staff does not need to take sits to ban people. just because he wasn't brought to a sit doesn't mean he is immune to being banned. Also if he was told to stop before hand and he still continues then their is no real reason to bring him to a sit other than formality. And their are plenty of people before that haven't gotten sits and where still banned, take hackers for an example. I don't get the argument that "Oh, he wasn't brought to a sit, therefor this ban was wrong" if he still did something that would have gotten him banned anyways. It is not really a good argument since the ban would've been placed either way. Buying doors in a Millitary Role Play server shouldn't even be an option but I guess it is in garnet, and it's against the rules to buy doors here. Vibe has done this before and as he has done this multiple times their is no reason it should be a FRP warn. Or maybe he DID get FRP warns and got banned for NITRP in the process, either way he broke the rules and is getting punished for it, and if he was told to stop before hand then their is no reason why he should be unbanned... -1

2GA is dead ya know, If i legitimately could I would honestly dissolve it. No one should inherit this faction at this moment in time.

The Thing with MRP is that their isn't much to do during peacetime or on Tiga. While kill house is a thing, in my opinion it is way too long and way too complex, especially for new players. but then again, during an hour of peace time their isn't much to do either. What I would suggest is decreasing peacetime to about 50 or 40 minutes, Or incorporating an indefinite war system where players can go outside and skirmish among themselves and claiming areas is a way to not getting killed outside and such. Either way, the server get VARY boring during peacetime, and while i know its used for tryouts and what not, at this moment I feel it is better we: A) Make peacetime shorter and wars longer Or B) Incorporate an indefinite war system, whether it be the one I talked about or something else While I understand Sims and tryouts are up to the officers of 2GA & Army, The thing is with 2GA, Our officers are either demotivated, burnt out, just bored of the server or inactive; And as for Army, I can't speak on their behave because I don't go over there. Their is only so much we can do during peacetime that eventually we would have done what can be done and it just gets boring, and enlisted members on both sides can only entertain themselves for so long that they either leave or Mass RDM. Seeing as the server is more combat orientated I feel that an indefinite war system is much more preferable than a hour of peacetime; Though if anyone has any other suggestions to add on to this or if yall wanna criticize me you can, these are just some suggestions I think garnet should look into.

Yeah, I highly doubt you're going to be included in the next ban wipe. FYI - some people never get unbanned, even though ban wipes.

You are one of the few people that made me stay on this server for as long as I have, and i honestly want to thank you for it. I hope you find strength in any future endeavors you may face in you're life outside for garnet!

+1 I Would make a short reply about why i agree with this, but I will make a more detailed one for each of the options. Option A: This option makes some sense in theory for some classes. For example DEVGRU's members killing players underwater would simply turn into submarines, having to go up every now and then, and the same goes for PDSS. while the drowning system would apply greatly with 2GA, Army, GB and the other non-Amphibious factions it also kinda defeats the purpose of DEVGRU and PDSS as both are underwater combat units. However including this system would bring some level of fairness as those who are forced to surface would be visible to all on the ground. Option B: Including a knife for all classes may pose a problem; While a ugly knife might encourage players to get a donator knife, the knife itself would have to be nerfed. More specifically the damage would need to be decreased since the knife will be free and everyone would get one. Without the knife damage being decreased I feel players would not really find a big need to buy a donator knife since they would already have a knife that does the same amount of damage as the donator; It would just feel like they are buying a reskinned and or different version of the same, free knife they already have. It would kinda have to be the same as Army's M60 and the donator M60; one is bad, and the other is amazing. Option C : Making Underwater combat failRP make literally no sense; I kinda said this for option A but it would defeat the purpose on DEVGRU and PDSS for underwater combat. Making underwater combat FailRP for non-amphibious player models and faction makes more sense then making it FRP for all including the factions that IRL, specialize in underwater combat. While it wouldn't be impossible to enforce, it also makes no sense to make it FailRP role play wise. Anti-frogmen techniques does exist IRL, the Italians even had a frogmen unit in WW2. In conclusion: I am leaning more towards A and somewhat B; for A, It makes sense to not have people camping in the water the whole time. And B, New players have a way to defend themselves if they were to get in contact with a Seal or frogman and it would provide them a melee weapon, though as I have mentioned, that knife would have to be nerfed so people would buy a donator knife for the server. This suggestion is pretty good my man, I will defiantly be rooting for option A!

-1 With all due respects, I don't think anyone knows you. I suggest play a lot more and get to know everyone on both RU and US. You also need more then what you have for this app. Please get to know the community before placing a staff application.

I hope life treats you well my man, you deserve it! See you another time, Comrade!

maybe but that wasn't really what I meant; I was talking more about just survival mode, though I could have worded it better. But at the same time both ideas aren't really bad ones.

Maybe not a Battle Royal type server would be the best option since there are dozens of Minecraft servers that have that; Perhaps a sandbox with some anti griefing rules and a few mods to help enforce those rules.

When the CIS is ran by racists white people...

There is the currently active 2nd Guards Tank Army based in modern day Russia. There is also several Motorized infantry brigades with in the army like the 21st Guards Motor Rifle brigade whom were involved in the war in Dombass, specifically the Battle of Ilovaisk. If we are to rename 2GA, we should probably rename it from the aforementioned brigade, perhaps 21MRB. But then again, I haven't really seen any complaints about 2GA's name and I don't think the enlisted, nor most of the officers have a problem with it, even if 2GA refers to a disbanded field army. But then again, I am not opposed to the idea, as long as they don't give us a retarded name. +1

Let me list off some things as to why i disagree with this and a -1 1. Replacing the Shotgun with the PKM While I am not opposed to a LMG class for 2GA, We already have a weapon that can turn into one, The AK-74 which can be modified and can turn into a RPK; a light machine gun, just like the PKM. 2. The damage of the MP-153 This section feels like a complaint, coming from someone who mainly plays US (Then again, I'm a 2GA Officer defending the MP-153). I think what you are forgetting is that the MP-153, well... IS A SHOTGUN. Of course its going to one shot someone at close range, that's literally the purpose of a shotgun. As for long range engagements, blame slug rounds. Even I know the power of slug rounds. However this does not render the marksman class useless, as the MP-153 can only have ammo types equipped. This means that if you are getting killed from someone using this shotgun, chances are they have really good aim and can use the iron sights while in long range engagements. The SKS is a good sniper as long as you land your shots, It can also be equipped with a scope making long range engagements more easier and effective; With the MP-153 you HAVE to use your iron sights, From my experiences it is much easier to use the iron sights for close to mid range firefights and I think the everyone else who has the demolition class would agree as well. 3. The Shotgun is OP at close range. You seem to mention that the shotgun is OP at close range, which makes me wounder if you are making this suggestion because you think replacing the MP-153 with the PKM would solve the "issue" that that army has a (Shitty) LMG and 2GA doesn't?; Or if you would like it to be replaced because you and others, with all due respects, are salty that you get killed easily in CQC and would like the shotgun to be replaced so you don't have to go though all the rage and saltiness of dying by a shotgun in a building. Like i said before, It is suppose to Insta kill at close range, other wise it would be a pump action rife. (I have a feeling it's called that anyways but I think you get my point). At long range, slug rounds do their job as intended, I do sympathize with how OP the shotgun is at long range, but as i mentioned, slug rounds are to blame when it comes to that and it can be difficult to fight in long range combat with iron sights. 4. The "Imbalance" I don't think the MP-153 is a force that creates an "Imbalance". I would say the same thing about the SKS and M14. With the SKS you can change the fire mode and conventionally reload it. If you really want to replace the MP-153 with an LMG then we should also replace the SKS with another Russian/Soviet Era sniper; Because as the 2GA Demolition class is better than Army's Demoliton class, Army's Marksman is better than 2GA's Marksman Conclusion I am not opposing a dedicated LMG class for 2GA, I would actually support it; However it seems as though this suggestion is more for the fact the the MP-153 is an OP weapon and you and others would like to see it begone. both base factions have a bad weapon, for 2GA that's the SKS (and so a small extent the AK-74), and Army's bad weapon is the demolition's M60. I've heard the their M60 is bad, as someone who plays on U.S you should be suggesting to change the M60 over the MP-153. The 2GA demolition class is fine the way it is. As I've mentioned, you would like to see it replaced because it is simply too OP for you and many others. With all due respects (again), No one on RU has asked the MP-153 shotgun to be replaced, in fact we would like the SKS to be replaced more than the AK. If you would like to improve 2GA or RU, please find out what problems we want fixed and then make a suggestion about it. But then again, I am a 2GA Officer. If your looking for a TL;DR then I would like for you to take some time our of your day just to read it, I promise it will be worth your time Thanks For Reading

Honestly

So what you are trying to say is, I can make a post on a, let's say Instagram, and in the post i have a fully loading and fully auto AK and the caption is "Don't come to school tomorrow or else", and the Feds come in and raid my house; Can i claim that the bullets were blanks and i was "joking" about shooting up my school?

I like how a lot of people are saying that hes joking but that's not even the point. Even if Buddah was joking, whitebolt took it seriously, EVEN IF buddah was joking. You can't just make statements like this and not expect some kind of repercussion from the person you are threatening. If i threatened to DDos all of garnets servers, I would be banned for DDos threats, even IF i have no experience with DDosing and what not, it is still a valid threat. A threatening statement is still a threatening statement and i find it quite funny that some don't even want to acknowledge that in the defense of their friend. As for Samsong, he had is LT reserves whipped so it doesn't even matter if he wasn't minging or not, with or without cars. It is a faction rule in 2GA that enlisted are not allowed to spawn vehicles without permission from a LT+, and RFR's are strictly restricted to using vehicles for showing new players around the map, they cannot use it for joyriding. Samsong getting his officers whitelist removed was inevitable the second I saw him with it. besides he literally has commando class in PDSS (or whatever its called) so why did he HAVE to use the officers class to spawn vehicles? In conclusion, Buddah should apologize to whitebolt, even if it was a joke. like i said a threat is still a threat. And Samsong's case has already been settled.

Get well soon ducky!

Honestly, There was a more Proper and a more acceptable way to go out; This was actually stupid, but there was no stopping it... So... -1

You got me spot on, kinda lol

I have posted a 2 week LOA on 2GA Docs for you. See you soon!

I'm glad i was under the marshal ship such as yours Aidan, Cya!

+1 Recommend the SVD Dragunov or the SVT-40, infinitely better snipers